Ads Here

Check Any Baby Names Popularity Comparison

Haskell vs Noah — Popularity Comparison

Latest years first · counts are girls + boys combined (split shown in table).

Trend

Haskell Noah

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
2024	8 \| 0/8	20,876 \| 539/20,337
2023	6 \| 0/6	19,545 \| 457/19,088
2022	10 \| 0/10	19,214 \| 479/18,735
2021	7 \| 0/7	19,324 \| 418/18,906
2020	9 \| 0/9	18,759 \| 308/18,451
2019	10 \| 0/10	19,391 \| 219/19,172
2018	5 \| 0/5	18,604 \| 175/18,429
2017	6 \| 0/6	18,678 \| 176/18,502
2016	9 \| 0/9	19,321 \| 134/19,187
2015	7 \| 0/7	19,815 \| 137/19,678

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
2014	10 \| 0/10	19,445 \| 107/19,338
2013	6 \| 0/6	18,367 \| 80/18,287
2012	6 \| 0/6	17,456 \| 78/17,378
2011	5 \| 0/5	16,960 \| 79/16,881
2010	5 \| 0/5	16,558 \| 80/16,478
2009	0 \| 0/0	17,331 \| 70/17,261
2008	5 \| 0/5	15,859 \| 56/15,803
2007	0 \| 0/0	16,695 \| 92/16,603
2006	7 \| 0/7	16,393 \| 53/16,340
2005	6 \| 0/6	13,961 \| 56/13,905

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
2004	0 \| 0/0	11,998 \| 87/11,911
2003	0 \| 0/0	11,906 \| 64/11,842
2002	0 \| 0/0	12,118 \| 42/12,076
2001	5 \| 0/5	13,529 \| 36/13,493
2000	0 \| 0/0	14,346 \| 64/14,282
1999	0 \| 0/0	14,987 \| 56/14,931
1998	6 \| 0/6	13,471 \| 57/13,414
1997	0 \| 0/0	9,342 \| 63/9,279
1996	5 \| 0/5	7,227 \| 43/7,184
1995	5 \| 0/5	3,844 \| 20/3,824

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1994	0 \| 0/0	2,097 \| 17/2,080
1993	0 \| 0/0	1,520 \| 17/1,503
1992	5 \| 0/5	1,438 \| 14/1,424
1991	7 \| 0/7	1,328 \| 13/1,315
1990	8 \| 0/8	1,320 \| 9/1,311
1989	0 \| 0/0	1,255 \| 13/1,242
1988	0 \| 0/0	1,077 \| 12/1,065
1987	0 \| 0/0	1,004 \| 8/996
1986	10 \| 0/10	1,051 \| 12/1,039
1985	6 \| 0/6	1,109 \| 0/1,109

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1984	0 \| 0/0	1,254 \| 8/1,246
1983	11 \| 0/11	1,560 \| 18/1,542
1982	7 \| 0/7	1,831 \| 14/1,817
1981	12 \| 0/12	1,413 \| 13/1,400
1980	11 \| 0/11	933 \| 5/928
1979	12 \| 0/12	923 \| 10/913
1978	14 \| 0/14	698 \| 9/689
1977	12 \| 0/12	690 \| 7/683
1976	9 \| 0/9	543 \| 0/543
1975	13 \| 0/13	585 \| 5/580

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1974	14 \| 0/14	548 \| 0/548
1973	11 \| 0/11	492 \| 0/492
1972	10 \| 0/10	422 \| 0/422
1971	9 \| 0/9	478 \| 0/478
1970	13 \| 0/13	347 \| 7/340
1969	14 \| 0/14	247 \| 0/247
1968	13 \| 0/13	174 \| 0/174
1967	7 \| 0/7	154 \| 0/154
1966	25 \| 0/25	157 \| 0/157
1965	23 \| 0/23	120 \| 0/120

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1964	19 \| 0/19	138 \| 0/138
1963	21 \| 0/21	124 \| 0/124
1962	24 \| 0/24	140 \| 0/140
1961	19 \| 0/19	131 \| 5/126
1960	27 \| 0/27	139 \| 0/139
1959	20 \| 0/20	153 \| 0/153
1958	24 \| 0/24	137 \| 0/137
1957	25 \| 0/25	153 \| 0/153
1956	34 \| 0/34	138 \| 0/138
1955	28 \| 0/28	133 \| 0/133

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1954	34 \| 0/34	131 \| 0/131
1953	36 \| 0/36	161 \| 0/161
1952	33 \| 0/33	143 \| 0/143
1951	41 \| 0/41	154 \| 0/154
1950	33 \| 0/33	153 \| 0/153
1949	41 \| 0/41	149 \| 0/149
1948	36 \| 0/36	150 \| 0/150
1947	48 \| 0/48	156 \| 0/156
1946	39 \| 0/39	130 \| 0/130
1945	40 \| 0/40	133 \| 0/133

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1944	44 \| 0/44	157 \| 0/157
1943	57 \| 0/57	155 \| 0/155
1942	62 \| 0/62	182 \| 0/182
1941	40 \| 0/40	161 \| 0/161
1940	58 \| 0/58	150 \| 0/150
1939	51 \| 0/51	122 \| 0/122
1938	52 \| 0/52	145 \| 0/145
1937	61 \| 0/61	143 \| 0/143
1936	73 \| 0/73	147 \| 0/147
1935	58 \| 0/58	175 \| 0/175

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1934	59 \| 0/59	148 \| 0/148
1933	60 \| 0/60	173 \| 0/173
1932	73 \| 0/73	182 \| 0/182
1931	78 \| 0/78	186 \| 6/180
1930	87 \| 0/87	191 \| 0/191
1929	76 \| 0/76	197 \| 0/197
1928	77 \| 0/77	174 \| 0/174
1927	76 \| 0/76	236 \| 0/236
1926	84 \| 0/84	235 \| 0/235
1925	90 \| 0/90	219 \| 0/219

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1924	99 \| 5/94	239 \| 0/239
1923	100 \| 0/100	259 \| 0/259
1922	97 \| 0/97	236 \| 0/236
1921	89 \| 0/89	247 \| 0/247
1920	79 \| 0/79	242 \| 0/242
1919	104 \| 0/104	253 \| 0/253
1918	86 \| 0/86	247 \| 0/247
1917	88 \| 5/83	219 \| 0/219
1916	92 \| 0/92	229 \| 0/229
1915	80 \| 0/80	189 \| 0/189

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1914	60 \| 0/60	171 \| 0/171
1913	67 \| 0/67	141 \| 0/141
1912	48 \| 0/48	116 \| 0/116
1911	22 \| 0/22	82 \| 0/82
1910	30 \| 0/30	87 \| 0/87
1909	22 \| 0/22	62 \| 0/62
1908	31 \| 0/31	68 \| 0/68
1907	24 \| 0/24	61 \| 0/61
1906	20 \| 0/20	60 \| 0/60
1905	9 \| 0/9	60 \| 0/60

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1904	7 \| 0/7	46 \| 0/46
1903	8 \| 0/8	48 \| 0/48
1902	9 \| 0/9	69 \| 0/69
1901	6 \| 0/6	56 \| 0/56
1900	6 \| 0/6	92 \| 0/92
1899	5 \| 0/5	47 \| 0/47
1898	6 \| 0/6	68 \| 0/68
1897	7 \| 0/7	58 \| 0/58
1896	7 \| 0/7	69 \| 0/69
1895	0 \| 0/0	72 \| 0/72

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1894	6 \| 0/6	74 \| 0/74
1893	7 \| 0/7	69 \| 0/69
1892	7 \| 0/7	79 \| 0/79
1891	8 \| 0/8	76 \| 0/76
1890	0 \| 0/0	74 \| 0/74
1889	0 \| 0/0	85 \| 0/85
1888	0 \| 0/0	83 \| 0/83
1887	7 \| 0/7	94 \| 0/94
1886	0 \| 0/0	90 \| 0/90
1885	0 \| 0/0	76 \| 0/76

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Haskell (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1884	0 \| 0/0	94 \| 0/94
1883	5 \| 0/5	81 \| 0/81
1882	0 \| 0/0	108 \| 0/108
1881	0 \| 0/0	81 \| 0/81
1880	0 \| 0/0	103 \| 0/103