Ads Here

Check Any Baby Names Popularity Comparison

Rudolph vs Noah — Popularity Comparison

Latest years first · counts are girls + boys combined (split shown in table).

Trend

Rudolph Noah

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
2024	34 \| 0/34	20,876 \| 539/20,337
2023	22 \| 0/22	19,545 \| 457/19,088
2022	30 \| 0/30	19,214 \| 479/18,735
2021	31 \| 0/31	19,324 \| 418/18,906
2020	28 \| 0/28	18,759 \| 308/18,451
2019	41 \| 0/41	19,391 \| 219/19,172
2018	34 \| 0/34	18,604 \| 175/18,429
2017	40 \| 0/40	18,678 \| 176/18,502
2016	34 \| 0/34	19,321 \| 134/19,187
2015	41 \| 0/41	19,815 \| 137/19,678

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
2014	47 \| 0/47	19,445 \| 107/19,338
2013	36 \| 0/36	18,367 \| 80/18,287
2012	43 \| 0/43	17,456 \| 78/17,378
2011	44 \| 0/44	16,960 \| 79/16,881
2010	32 \| 0/32	16,558 \| 80/16,478
2009	35 \| 0/35	17,331 \| 70/17,261
2008	54 \| 0/54	15,859 \| 56/15,803
2007	45 \| 0/45	16,695 \| 92/16,603
2006	50 \| 0/50	16,393 \| 53/16,340
2005	58 \| 0/58	13,961 \| 56/13,905

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
2004	59 \| 0/59	11,998 \| 87/11,911
2003	65 \| 0/65	11,906 \| 64/11,842
2002	69 \| 0/69	12,118 \| 42/12,076
2001	82 \| 0/82	13,529 \| 36/13,493
2000	72 \| 0/72	14,346 \| 64/14,282
1999	63 \| 0/63	14,987 \| 56/14,931
1998	92 \| 0/92	13,471 \| 57/13,414
1997	76 \| 0/76	9,342 \| 63/9,279
1996	109 \| 0/109	7,227 \| 43/7,184
1995	105 \| 0/105	3,844 \| 20/3,824

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1994	105 \| 0/105	2,097 \| 17/2,080
1993	108 \| 0/108	1,520 \| 17/1,503
1992	119 \| 0/119	1,438 \| 14/1,424
1991	131 \| 0/131	1,328 \| 13/1,315
1990	146 \| 0/146	1,320 \| 9/1,311
1989	183 \| 0/183	1,255 \| 13/1,242
1988	170 \| 0/170	1,077 \| 12/1,065
1987	156 \| 0/156	1,004 \| 8/996
1986	139 \| 0/139	1,051 \| 12/1,039
1985	157 \| 0/157	1,109 \| 0/1,109

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1984	165 \| 0/165	1,254 \| 8/1,246
1983	175 \| 0/175	1,560 \| 18/1,542
1982	192 \| 0/192	1,831 \| 14/1,817
1981	170 \| 0/170	1,413 \| 13/1,400
1980	196 \| 0/196	933 \| 5/928
1979	190 \| 0/190	923 \| 10/913
1978	182 \| 0/182	698 \| 9/689
1977	181 \| 0/181	690 \| 7/683
1976	198 \| 0/198	543 \| 0/543
1975	188 \| 0/188	585 \| 5/580

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1974	223 \| 6/217	548 \| 0/548
1973	220 \| 5/215	492 \| 0/492
1972	231 \| 0/231	422 \| 0/422
1971	275 \| 0/275	478 \| 0/478
1970	309 \| 0/309	347 \| 7/340
1969	251 \| 0/251	247 \| 0/247
1968	270 \| 0/270	174 \| 0/174
1967	276 \| 0/276	154 \| 0/154
1966	352 \| 0/352	157 \| 0/157
1965	328 \| 0/328	120 \| 0/120

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1964	378 \| 0/378	138 \| 0/138
1963	412 \| 0/412	124 \| 0/124
1962	412 \| 0/412	140 \| 0/140
1961	414 \| 0/414	131 \| 5/126
1960	442 \| 0/442	139 \| 0/139
1959	458 \| 0/458	153 \| 0/153
1958	486 \| 0/486	137 \| 0/137
1957	572 \| 0/572	153 \| 0/153
1956	719 \| 0/719	138 \| 0/138
1955	660 \| 7/653	133 \| 0/133

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1954	653 \| 0/653	131 \| 0/131
1953	745 \| 0/745	161 \| 0/161
1952	777 \| 0/777	143 \| 0/143
1951	836 \| 5/831	154 \| 0/154
1950	756 \| 0/756	153 \| 0/153
1949	822 \| 0/822	149 \| 0/149
1948	716 \| 0/716	150 \| 0/150
1947	696 \| 0/696	156 \| 0/156
1946	634 \| 6/628	130 \| 0/130
1945	579 \| 5/574	133 \| 0/133

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1944	578 \| 5/573	157 \| 0/157
1943	664 \| 0/664	155 \| 0/155
1942	658 \| 0/658	182 \| 0/182
1941	600 \| 0/600	161 \| 0/161
1940	627 \| 5/622	150 \| 0/150
1939	587 \| 0/587	122 \| 0/122
1938	684 \| 0/684	145 \| 0/145
1937	630 \| 0/630	143 \| 0/143
1936	647 \| 0/647	147 \| 0/147
1935	745 \| 0/745	175 \| 0/175

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1934	787 \| 8/779	148 \| 0/148
1933	853 \| 6/847	173 \| 0/173
1932	965 \| 5/960	182 \| 0/182
1931	1,114 \| 13/1,101	186 \| 6/180
1930	1,234 \| 15/1,219	191 \| 0/191
1929	1,230 \| 10/1,220	197 \| 0/197
1928	1,325 \| 17/1,308	174 \| 0/174
1927	1,700 \| 10/1,690	236 \| 0/236
1926	1,643 \| 7/1,636	235 \| 0/235
1925	1,252 \| 12/1,240	219 \| 0/219

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1924	1,238 \| 9/1,229	239 \| 0/239
1923	1,303 \| 0/1,303	259 \| 0/259
1922	1,145 \| 0/1,145	236 \| 0/236
1921	967 \| 7/960	247 \| 0/247
1920	835 \| 5/830	242 \| 0/242
1919	802 \| 0/802	253 \| 0/253
1918	972 \| 10/962	247 \| 0/247
1917	952 \| 6/946	219 \| 0/219
1916	988 \| 0/988	229 \| 0/229
1915	980 \| 6/974	189 \| 0/189

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1914	739 \| 7/732	171 \| 0/171
1913	565 \| 0/565	141 \| 0/141
1912	453 \| 0/453	116 \| 0/116
1911	217 \| 0/217	82 \| 0/82
1910	218 \| 0/218	87 \| 0/87
1909	173 \| 0/173	62 \| 0/62
1908	173 \| 0/173	68 \| 0/68
1907	135 \| 0/135	61 \| 0/61
1906	125 \| 0/125	60 \| 0/60
1905	132 \| 0/132	60 \| 0/60

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1904	128 \| 0/128	46 \| 0/46
1903	120 \| 0/120	48 \| 0/48
1902	119 \| 0/119	69 \| 0/69
1901	87 \| 0/87	56 \| 0/56
1900	147 \| 0/147	92 \| 0/92
1899	100 \| 0/100	47 \| 0/47
1898	115 \| 0/115	68 \| 0/68
1897	109 \| 0/109	58 \| 0/58
1896	108 \| 0/108	69 \| 0/69
1895	106 \| 0/106	72 \| 0/72

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1894	104 \| 0/104	74 \| 0/74
1893	101 \| 0/101	69 \| 0/69
1892	95 \| 0/95	79 \| 0/79
1891	68 \| 0/68	76 \| 0/76
1890	92 \| 0/92	74 \| 0/74
1889	83 \| 0/83	85 \| 0/85
1888	54 \| 0/54	83 \| 0/83
1887	71 \| 0/71	94 \| 0/94
1886	68 \| 0/68	90 \| 0/90
1885	70 \| 0/70	76 \| 0/76

Ads Here

By Year

Year	Rudolph (total \| F/B)	Noah (total \| F/B)
1884	77 \| 0/77	94 \| 0/94
1883	61 \| 0/61	81 \| 0/81
1882	52 \| 0/52	108 \| 0/108
1881	62 \| 0/62	81 \| 0/81
1880	54 \| 0/54	103 \| 0/103