Total babies named Adam (all years): 578,925
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3,497 / #100 / 0.204% |
| 2023 | 3,482 / #103 / 0.204% |
| 2022 | 3,636 / #99 / 0.208% |
| 2021 | 3,656 / #104 / 0.209% |
| 2020 | 3,778 / #97 / 0.219% |
| 2019 | 4,188 / #91 / 0.234% |
| 2018 | 4,711 / #78 / 0.259% |
| 2017 | 4,932 / #77 / 0.267% |
| 2016 | 5,221 / #75 / 0.275% |
| 2015 | 5,402 / #73 / 0.282% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 5,343 / #79 / 0.278% |
| 2013 | 5,251 / #82 / 0.278% |
| 2012 | 5,323 / #82 / 0.281% |
| 2011 | 5,215 / #81 / 0.275% |
| 2010 | 5,110 / #80 / 0.266% |
| 2009 | 5,676 / #74 / 0.286% |
| 2008 | 6,098 / #72 / 0.299% |
| 2007 | 6,790 / #65 / 0.327% |
| 2006 | 6,804 / #64 / 0.331% |
| 2005 | 6,846 / #64 / 0.343% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 7,474 / #58 / 0.377% |
| 2003 | 7,690 / #58 / 0.389% |
| 2002 | 7,754 / #55 / 0.399% |
| 2001 | 7,757 / #51 / 0.399% |
| 2000 | 8,137 / #45 / 0.414% |
| 1999 | 8,223 / #44 / 0.428% |
| 1998 | 8,356 / #45 / 0.437% |
| 1997 | 8,805 / #39 / 0.467% |
| 1996 | 9,557 / #39 / 0.505% |
| 1995 | 10,485 / #38 / 0.551% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 11,022 / #38 / 0.571% |
| 1993 | 11,534 / #39 / 0.588% |
| 1992 | 11,903 / #36 / 0.596% |
| 1991 | 12,308 / #36 / 0.609% |
| 1990 | 14,713 / #32 / 0.716% |
| 1989 | 16,928 / #27 / 0.846% |
| 1988 | 16,465 / #26 / 0.860% |
| 1987 | 16,931 / #27 / 0.907% |
| 1986 | 18,155 / #24 / 0.986% |
| 1985 | 20,165 / #22 / 1.091% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 23,940 / #18 / 1.326% |
| 1983 | 23,489 / #18 / 1.310% |
| 1982 | 20,102 / #19 / 1.108% |
| 1981 | 20,042 / #20 / 1.119% |
| 1980 | 18,867 / #22 / 1.058% |
| 1979 | 17,050 / #23 / 0.990% |
| 1978 | 13,919 / #29 / 0.848% |
| 1977 | 11,031 / #33 / 0.671% |
| 1976 | 9,939 / #36 / 0.633% |
| 1975 | 8,646 / #38 / 0.554% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 8,425 / #36 / 0.536% |
| 1973 | 6,841 / #45 / 0.439% |
| 1972 | 5,740 / #51 / 0.354% |
| 1971 | 5,847 / #57 / 0.331% |
| 1970 | 4,314 / #72 / 0.232% |
| 1969 | 2,864 / #113 / 0.160% |
| 1968 | 2,540 / #119 / 0.146% |
| 1967 | 2,523 / #118 / 0.145% |
| 1966 | 2,498 / #123 / 0.140% |
| 1965 | 2,562 / #125 / 0.138% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 2,850 / #122 / 0.143% |
| 1963 | 2,346 / #145 / 0.116% |
| 1962 | 2,149 / #153 / 0.104% |
| 1961 | 1,580 / #193 / 0.074% |
| 1960 | 1,019 / #249 / 0.048% |
| 1959 | 582 / #322 / 0.027% |
| 1958 | 467 / #352 / 0.022% |
| 1957 | 432 / #370 / 0.020% |
| 1956 | 390 / #380 / 0.018% |
| 1955 | 354 / #382 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 281 / #428 / 0.014% |
| 1953 | 324 / #389 / 0.016% |
| 1952 | 294 / #404 / 0.015% |
| 1951 | 300 / #390 / 0.016% |
| 1950 | 308 / #382 / 0.017% |
| 1949 | 300 / #388 / 0.017% |
| 1948 | 240 / #430 / 0.014% |
| 1947 | 269 / #417 / 0.015% |
| 1946 | 247 / #406 / 0.015% |
| 1945 | 210 / #415 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 220 / #404 / 0.016% |
| 1943 | 253 / #385 / 0.018% |
| 1942 | 240 / #391 / 0.017% |
| 1941 | 230 / #381 / 0.019% |
| 1940 | 227 / #379 / 0.020% |
| 1939 | 216 / #385 / 0.020% |
| 1938 | 214 / #385 / 0.019% |
| 1937 | 222 / #363 / 0.021% |
| 1936 | 216 / #371 / 0.021% |
| 1935 | 237 / #356 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 239 / #355 / 0.023% |
| 1933 | 234 / #351 / 0.024% |
| 1932 | 258 / #344 / 0.025% |
| 1931 | 300 / #313 / 0.029% |
| 1930 | 273 / #337 / 0.025% |
| 1929 | 306 / #315 / 0.028% |
| 1928 | 359 / #297 / 0.032% |
| 1927 | 389 / #287 / 0.035% |
| 1926 | 425 / #277 / 0.038% |
| 1925 | 452 / #268 / 0.041% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 465 / #263 / 0.041% |
| 1923 | 428 / #273 / 0.039% |
| 1922 | 469 / #260 / 0.043% |
| 1921 | 583 / #228 / 0.053% |
| 1920 | 579 / #223 / 0.054% |
| 1919 | 542 / #224 / 0.055% |
| 1918 | 653 / #197 / 0.064% |
| 1917 | 614 / #193 / 0.066% |
| 1916 | 609 / #189 / 0.068% |
| 1915 | 574 / #194 / 0.068% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 489 / #182 / 0.075% |
| 1913 | 349 / #192 / 0.068% |
| 1912 | 307 / #188 / 0.071% |
| 1911 | 189 / #170 / 0.084% |
| 1910 | 154 / #182 / 0.079% |
| 1909 | 113 / #193 / 0.069% |
| 1908 | 109 / #192 / 0.071% |
| 1907 | 127 / #169 / 0.087% |
| 1906 | 105 / #173 / 0.079% |
| 1905 | 101 / #183 / 0.076% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 103 / #175 / 0.080% |
| 1903 | 82 / #193 / 0.069% |
| 1902 | 99 / #172 / 0.081% |
| 1901 | 71 / #201 / 0.067% |
| 1900 | 111 / #187 / 0.074% |
| 1899 | 74 / #185 / 0.070% |
| 1898 | 87 / #179 / 0.071% |
| 1897 | 88 / #175 / 0.078% |
| 1896 | 96 / #164 / 0.080% |
| 1895 | 78 / #190 / 0.066% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 86 / #176 / 0.074% |
| 1893 | 87 / #166 / 0.077% |
| 1892 | 106 / #151 / 0.087% |
| 1891 | 87 / #149 / 0.086% |
| 1890 | 74 / #180 / 0.067% |
| 1889 | 93 / #153 / 0.084% |
| 1888 | 120 / #130 / 0.099% |
| 1887 | 84 / #150 / 0.083% |
| 1886 | 103 / #134 / 0.093% |
| 1885 | 96 / #141 / 0.089% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 83 / #167 / 0.073% |
| 1883 | 107 / #118 / 0.102% |
| 1882 | 114 / #123 / 0.100% |
| 1881 | 116 / #108 / 0.115% |
| 1880 | 104 / #123 / 0.094% |