Total babies named Adolph (all years): 18,765
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 / #12270 / 0.000% |
| 2022 | 8 / #8993 / 0.000% |
| 2020 | 6 / #10624 / 0.000% |
| 2019 | 5 / #12174 / 0.000% |
| 2017 | 6 / #10803 / 0.000% |
| 2016 | 7 / #9684 / 0.000% |
| 2014 | 8 / #8795 / 0.000% |
| 2013 | 7 / #9671 / 0.000% |
| 2011 | 8 / #8776 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 7 / #9709 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2009 | 5 / #12525 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 7 / #9885 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 12 / #6626 / 0.001% |
| 2006 | 11 / #6910 / 0.001% |
| 2005 | 7 / #9128 / 0.000% |
| 2004 | 9 / #7545 / 0.000% |
| 2003 | 8 / #7849 / 0.000% |
| 2002 | 7 / #8462 / 0.000% |
| 2001 | 12 / #5672 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 15 / #4786 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1999 | 13 / #5038 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 16 / #4203 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 22 / #3262 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 13 / #4616 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 21 / #3192 / 0.001% |
| 1994 | 25 / #2848 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 22 / #3044 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 35 / #2176 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 21 / #2988 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 27 / #2488 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1989 | 26 / #2469 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 23 / #2511 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 36 / #1793 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 39 / #1645 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 20 / #2504 / 0.001% |
| 1984 | 26 / #2036 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 43 / #1448 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 39 / #1565 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 43 / #1456 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 39 / #1547 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1979 | 44 / #1407 / 0.003% |
| 1978 | 44 / #1394 / 0.003% |
| 1977 | 42 / #1407 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 49 / #1239 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 45 / #1280 / 0.003% |
| 1974 | 63 / #1035 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 60 / #1045 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 53 / #1120 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 44 / #1254 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 74 / #926 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1969 | 51 / #1085 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 60 / #938 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 73 / #836 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 70 / #870 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 68 / #890 / 0.004% |
| 1964 | 91 / #787 / 0.005% |
| 1963 | 82 / #837 / 0.004% |
| 1962 | 88 / #808 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 100 / #771 / 0.005% |
| 1960 | 143 / #651 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1959 | 120 / #702 / 0.006% |
| 1958 | 126 / #678 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 135 / #659 / 0.006% |
| 1956 | 132 / #659 / 0.006% |
| 1955 | 151 / #599 / 0.007% |
| 1954 | 146 / #611 / 0.007% |
| 1953 | 153 / #581 / 0.008% |
| 1952 | 147 / #575 / 0.008% |
| 1951 | 117 / #651 / 0.006% |
| 1950 | 141 / #570 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1949 | 121 / #618 / 0.007% |
| 1948 | 128 / #593 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 106 / #668 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 95 / #663 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 116 / #555 / 0.009% |
| 1944 | 95 / #629 / 0.007% |
| 1943 | 128 / #559 / 0.009% |
| 1942 | 123 / #553 / 0.009% |
| 1941 | 173 / #448 / 0.014% |
| 1940 | 176 / #436 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1939 | 161 / #454 / 0.015% |
| 1938 | 188 / #413 / 0.017% |
| 1937 | 191 / #410 / 0.018% |
| 1936 | 192 / #395 / 0.019% |
| 1935 | 195 / #390 / 0.019% |
| 1934 | 210 / #377 / 0.020% |
| 1933 | 222 / #363 / 0.022% |
| 1932 | 242 / #357 / 0.023% |
| 1931 | 291 / #320 / 0.028% |
| 1930 | 297 / #320 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1929 | 333 / #303 / 0.031% |
| 1928 | 341 / #301 / 0.031% |
| 1927 | 411 / #278 / 0.036% |
| 1926 | 403 / #285 / 0.036% |
| 1925 | 424 / #279 / 0.038% |
| 1924 | 452 / #268 / 0.040% |
| 1923 | 515 / #246 / 0.047% |
| 1922 | 545 / #241 / 0.050% |
| 1921 | 525 / #246 / 0.048% |
| 1920 | 522 / #241 / 0.049% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1919 | 539 / #225 / 0.055% |
| 1918 | 637 / #202 / 0.063% |
| 1917 | 673 / #180 / 0.073% |
| 1916 | 633 / #185 / 0.071% |
| 1915 | 637 / #178 / 0.075% |
| 1914 | 418 / #199 / 0.064% |
| 1913 | 385 / #179 / 0.075% |
| 1912 | 318 / #183 / 0.074% |
| 1911 | 161 / #192 / 0.071% |
| 1910 | 122 / #210 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1909 | 107 / #202 / 0.065% |
| 1908 | 96 / #212 / 0.062% |
| 1907 | 90 / #212 / 0.061% |
| 1906 | 97 / #186 / 0.073% |
| 1905 | 86 / #201 / 0.065% |
| 1904 | 90 / #195 / 0.070% |
| 1903 | 91 / #183 / 0.076% |
| 1902 | 87 / #190 / 0.071% |
| 1901 | 80 / #180 / 0.075% |
| 1900 | 117 / #180 / 0.078% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1899 | 80 / #178 / 0.075% |
| 1898 | 84 / #185 / 0.068% |
| 1897 | 92 / #167 / 0.082% |
| 1896 | 93 / #173 / 0.078% |
| 1895 | 86 / #182 / 0.073% |
| 1894 | 93 / #165 / 0.080% |
| 1893 | 119 / #126 / 0.106% |
| 1892 | 115 / #142 / 0.094% |
| 1891 | 81 / #160 / 0.080% |
| 1890 | 102 / #138 / 0.092% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1889 | 101 / #144 / 0.091% |
| 1888 | 107 / #143 / 0.089% |
| 1887 | 90 / #140 / 0.089% |
| 1886 | 95 / #145 / 0.086% |
| 1885 | 102 / #133 / 0.095% |
| 1884 | 107 / #133 / 0.094% |
| 1883 | 115 / #112 / 0.110% |
| 1882 | 94 / #145 / 0.083% |
| 1881 | 90 / #137 / 0.089% |
| 1880 | 93 / #145 / 0.084% |