Total babies named Agatha (all years): 9,369
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 128 / #1618 / 0.008% |
| 2023 | 124 / #1670 / 0.008% |
| 2022 | 116 / #1774 / 0.007% |
| 2021 | 137 / #1532 / 0.008% |
| 2020 | 86 / #2115 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 78 / #2306 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 102 / #1937 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 95 / #2054 / 0.006% |
| 2016 | 77 / #2411 / 0.004% |
| 2015 | 87 / #2169 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 71 / #2517 / 0.004% |
| 2013 | 62 / #2768 / 0.004% |
| 2012 | 44 / #3583 / 0.003% |
| 2011 | 51 / #3223 / 0.003% |
| 2010 | 49 / #3307 / 0.003% |
| 2009 | 36 / #4199 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 38 / #4090 / 0.002% |
| 2007 | 47 / #3481 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 50 / #3265 / 0.003% |
| 2005 | 53 / #3009 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 24 / #5206 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 38 / #3658 / 0.002% |
| 2002 | 25 / #4770 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 23 / #5013 / 0.001% |
| 2000 | 28 / #4293 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 24 / #4578 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 28 / #4024 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 15 / #6165 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 14 / #6398 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 24 / #4218 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 15 / #5989 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 30 / #3588 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 29 / #3680 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 27 / #3818 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 29 / #3624 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 29 / #3478 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 27 / #3483 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 35 / #2781 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 30 / #3054 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 25 / #3419 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 28 / #3069 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 33 / #2659 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 50 / #2051 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 29 / #2986 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 28 / #3069 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 33 / #2674 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 17 / #4079 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 23 / #3270 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 32 / #2485 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 21 / #3261 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 24 / #2923 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 30 / #2456 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 21 / #3062 / 0.001% |
| 1971 | 25 / #2801 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 20 / #3209 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 32 / #2253 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 27 / #2359 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 27 / #2327 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 25 / #2408 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 30 / #2154 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 43 / #1781 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 30 / #2171 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 30 / #2163 / 0.002% |
| 1961 | 43 / #1743 / 0.002% |
| 1960 | 36 / #1890 / 0.002% |
| 1959 | 38 / #1793 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 54 / #1448 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 46 / #1589 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 36 / #1760 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 37 / #1692 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 51 / #1410 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 47 / #1425 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 60 / #1225 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 73 / #1090 / 0.004% |
| 1950 | 66 / #1135 / 0.004% |
| 1949 | 58 / #1190 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 49 / #1313 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 56 / #1204 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 68 / #1023 / 0.004% |
| 1945 | 68 / #914 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 47 / #1140 / 0.004% |
| 1943 | 60 / #1027 / 0.004% |
| 1942 | 58 / #1025 / 0.004% |
| 1941 | 63 / #924 / 0.005% |
| 1940 | 82 / #780 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 70 / #825 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 80 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 90 / #717 / 0.008% |
| 1936 | 77 / #768 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 102 / #647 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 75 / #774 / 0.007% |
| 1933 | 99 / #659 / 0.010% |
| 1932 | 94 / #698 / 0.009% |
| 1931 | 94 / #688 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 103 / #675 / 0.009% |
| 1929 | 121 / #625 / 0.011% |
| 1928 | 135 / #604 / 0.012% |
| 1927 | 133 / #618 / 0.011% |
| 1926 | 151 / #578 / 0.013% |
| 1925 | 168 / #556 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 180 / #540 / 0.014% |
| 1923 | 156 / #574 / 0.013% |
| 1922 | 187 / #509 / 0.016% |
| 1921 | 187 / #519 / 0.015% |
| 1920 | 206 / #473 / 0.017% |
| 1919 | 199 / #472 / 0.018% |
| 1918 | 218 / #452 / 0.019% |
| 1917 | 217 / #434 / 0.020% |
| 1916 | 213 / #431 / 0.020% |
| 1915 | 199 / #431 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 172 / #403 / 0.023% |
| 1913 | 153 / #392 / 0.025% |
| 1912 | 121 / #427 / 0.022% |
| 1911 | 83 / #446 / 0.020% |
| 1910 | 79 / #450 / 0.020% |
| 1909 | 72 / #435 / 0.021% |
| 1908 | 62 / #456 / 0.019% |
| 1907 | 65 / #444 / 0.020% |
| 1906 | 72 / #404 / 0.024% |
| 1905 | 66 / #420 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 52 / #450 / 0.019% |
| 1903 | 64 / #396 / 0.024% |
| 1902 | 51 / #434 / 0.019% |
| 1901 | 54 / #404 / 0.023% |
| 1900 | 65 / #417 / 0.022% |
| 1899 | 58 / #381 / 0.025% |
| 1898 | 56 / #411 / 0.022% |
| 1897 | 50 / #414 / 0.021% |
| 1896 | 50 / #403 / 0.021% |
| 1895 | 47 / #411 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 42 / #429 / 0.019% |
| 1893 | 38 / #436 / 0.018% |
| 1892 | 39 / #429 / 0.018% |
| 1891 | 46 / #365 / 0.025% |
| 1890 | 42 / #384 / 0.022% |
| 1889 | 33 / #422 / 0.019% |
| 1888 | 33 / #431 / 0.018% |
| 1887 | 25 / #446 / 0.017% |
| 1886 | 23 / #451 / 0.016% |
| 1885 | 19 / #485 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 18 / #480 / 0.014% |
| 1883 | 14 / #517 / 0.012% |
| 1882 | 21 / #389 / 0.019% |
| 1881 | 10 / #539 / 0.011% |
| 1880 | 16 / #421 / 0.018% |