Total babies named Annabelle (all years): 66,642
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 891 / #349 / 0.055% |
| 2023 | 915 / #340 / 0.057% |
| 2022 | 997 / #322 / 0.061% |
| 2021 | 1,146 / #275 / 0.070% |
| 2020 | 1,320 / #221 / 0.082% |
| 2019 | 1,698 / #171 / 0.101% |
| 2018 | 1,987 / #142 / 0.117% |
| 2017 | 2,623 / #118 / 0.152% |
| 2016 | 3,000 / #104 / 0.169% |
| 2015 | 3,282 / #92 / 0.184% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 4,363 / #57 / 0.244% |
| 2013 | 3,559 / #81 / 0.203% |
| 2012 | 3,058 / #99 / 0.174% |
| 2011 | 2,731 / #111 / 0.155% |
| 2010 | 2,640 / #117 / 0.149% |
| 2009 | 2,057 / #156 / 0.112% |
| 2008 | 1,813 / #188 / 0.096% |
| 2007 | 1,731 / #196 / 0.090% |
| 2006 | 1,667 / #207 / 0.088% |
| 2005 | 1,405 / #239 / 0.076% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,067 / #300 / 0.058% |
| 2003 | 1,063 / #292 / 0.058% |
| 2002 | 917 / #331 / 0.051% |
| 2001 | 862 / #349 / 0.048% |
| 2000 | 597 / #464 / 0.033% |
| 1999 | 521 / #499 / 0.029% |
| 1998 | 359 / #641 / 0.020% |
| 1997 | 241 / #848 / 0.014% |
| 1996 | 211 / #926 / 0.012% |
| 1995 | 194 / #970 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 129 / #1313 / 0.007% |
| 1993 | 103 / #1519 / 0.006% |
| 1992 | 106 / #1486 / 0.006% |
| 1991 | 80 / #1779 / 0.004% |
| 1990 | 73 / #1905 / 0.004% |
| 1989 | 89 / #1575 / 0.005% |
| 1988 | 61 / #1969 / 0.003% |
| 1987 | 50 / #2157 / 0.003% |
| 1986 | 52 / #2053 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 53 / #2022 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 63 / #1728 / 0.004% |
| 1983 | 50 / #2024 / 0.003% |
| 1982 | 51 / #2023 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 55 / #1937 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 56 / #1905 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 50 / #2020 / 0.003% |
| 1978 | 37 / #2392 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 55 / #1834 / 0.004% |
| 1976 | 74 / #1423 / 0.005% |
| 1975 | 46 / #1936 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 50 / #1775 / 0.003% |
| 1973 | 64 / #1480 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 53 / #1676 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 58 / #1613 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 75 / #1389 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 83 / #1227 / 0.005% |
| 1968 | 45 / #1749 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 55 / #1507 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 65 / #1352 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 65 / #1368 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 62 / #1432 / 0.003% |
| 1963 | 49 / #1623 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 57 / #1474 / 0.003% |
| 1961 | 70 / #1328 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 64 / #1374 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 65 / #1327 / 0.003% |
| 1958 | 66 / #1300 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 55 / #1428 / 0.003% |
| 1956 | 52 / #1471 / 0.003% |
| 1955 | 26 / #2110 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 52 / #1393 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 46 / #1440 / 0.002% |
| 1952 | 57 / #1259 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 68 / #1134 / 0.004% |
| 1950 | 100 / #890 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 111 / #836 / 0.006% |
| 1948 | 116 / #801 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 112 / #828 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 115 / #767 / 0.007% |
| 1945 | 105 / #728 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 134 / #631 / 0.010% |
| 1943 | 135 / #652 / 0.010% |
| 1942 | 153 / #600 / 0.011% |
| 1941 | 156 / #559 / 0.013% |
| 1940 | 188 / #503 / 0.016% |
| 1939 | 194 / #479 / 0.018% |
| 1938 | 218 / #456 / 0.020% |
| 1937 | 175 / #499 / 0.016% |
| 1936 | 215 / #440 / 0.021% |
| 1935 | 248 / #415 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 282 / #380 / 0.027% |
| 1933 | 263 / #396 / 0.026% |
| 1932 | 356 / #336 / 0.033% |
| 1931 | 452 / #298 / 0.042% |
| 1930 | 462 / #309 / 0.041% |
| 1929 | 480 / #303 / 0.043% |
| 1928 | 566 / #274 / 0.049% |
| 1927 | 567 / #276 / 0.048% |
| 1926 | 629 / #266 / 0.053% |
| 1925 | 574 / #278 / 0.047% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 673 / #254 / 0.054% |
| 1923 | 615 / #260 / 0.051% |
| 1922 | 584 / #266 / 0.049% |
| 1921 | 631 / #262 / 0.051% |
| 1920 | 571 / #273 / 0.048% |
| 1919 | 472 / #294 / 0.042% |
| 1918 | 484 / #288 / 0.042% |
| 1917 | 500 / #275 / 0.046% |
| 1916 | 448 / #282 / 0.043% |
| 1915 | 427 / #284 / 0.043% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 315 / #295 / 0.041% |
| 1913 | 240 / #305 / 0.038% |
| 1912 | 219 / #310 / 0.039% |
| 1911 | 164 / #309 / 0.039% |
| 1910 | 121 / #361 / 0.031% |
| 1909 | 108 / #347 / 0.031% |
| 1908 | 113 / #335 / 0.034% |
| 1907 | 94 / #363 / 0.030% |
| 1906 | 78 / #388 / 0.026% |
| 1905 | 90 / #352 / 0.031% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 76 / #377 / 0.028% |
| 1903 | 60 / #407 / 0.023% |
| 1902 | 65 / #387 / 0.025% |
| 1901 | 54 / #406 / 0.023% |
| 1900 | 73 / #388 / 0.024% |
| 1899 | 45 / #433 / 0.019% |
| 1898 | 77 / #355 / 0.030% |
| 1897 | 28 / #568 / 0.012% |
| 1896 | 44 / #434 / 0.018% |
| 1895 | 42 / #438 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 33 / #495 / 0.015% |
| 1893 | 31 / #487 / 0.015% |
| 1892 | 41 / #413 / 0.019% |
| 1891 | 33 / #440 / 0.018% |
| 1890 | 40 / #400 / 0.021% |
| 1889 | 29 / #456 / 0.016% |
| 1888 | 19 / #574 / 0.011% |
| 1887 | 22 / #475 / 0.015% |
| 1886 | 21 / #477 / 0.015% |
| 1885 | 27 / #395 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 14 / #557 / 0.011% |
| 1883 | 11 / #584 / 0.010% |
| 1882 | 22 / #377 / 0.020% |
| 1881 | 13 / #471 / 0.014% |
| 1880 | 9 / #585 / 0.010% |