Total babies named Cassie (all years): 46,847
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 182 / #1273 / 0.011% |
| 2023 | 186 / #1244 / 0.012% |
| 2022 | 193 / #1246 / 0.012% |
| 2021 | 188 / #1250 / 0.011% |
| 2020 | 182 / #1249 / 0.011% |
| 2019 | 197 / #1192 / 0.012% |
| 2018 | 184 / #1257 / 0.011% |
| 2017 | 184 / #1282 / 0.011% |
| 2016 | 211 / #1184 / 0.012% |
| 2015 | 194 / #1260 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 202 / #1207 / 0.011% |
| 2013 | 208 / #1154 / 0.012% |
| 2012 | 210 / #1169 / 0.012% |
| 2011 | 207 / #1173 / 0.012% |
| 2010 | 212 / #1150 / 0.012% |
| 2009 | 280 / #954 / 0.015% |
| 2008 | 304 / #906 / 0.016% |
| 2007 | 367 / #783 / 0.019% |
| 2006 | 387 / #727 / 0.020% |
| 2005 | 382 / #715 / 0.021% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 412 / #664 / 0.022% |
| 2003 | 509 / #547 / 0.028% |
| 2002 | 508 / #542 / 0.028% |
| 2001 | 619 / #450 / 0.034% |
| 2000 | 886 / #348 / 0.049% |
| 1999 | 960 / #323 / 0.054% |
| 1998 | 979 / #310 / 0.055% |
| 1997 | 738 / #369 / 0.042% |
| 1996 | 652 / #403 / 0.037% |
| 1995 | 727 / #358 / 0.041% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 895 / #305 / 0.050% |
| 1993 | 952 / #289 / 0.053% |
| 1992 | 1,168 / #235 / 0.063% |
| 1991 | 1,121 / #248 / 0.060% |
| 1990 | 1,253 / #229 / 0.066% |
| 1989 | 1,375 / #196 / 0.075% |
| 1988 | 1,599 / #176 / 0.090% |
| 1987 | 1,755 / #155 / 0.101% |
| 1986 | 1,807 / #156 / 0.105% |
| 1985 | 1,660 / #170 / 0.096% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,777 / #158 / 0.106% |
| 1983 | 1,598 / #173 / 0.096% |
| 1982 | 2,193 / #137 / 0.130% |
| 1981 | 1,224 / #214 / 0.073% |
| 1980 | 770 / #314 / 0.046% |
| 1979 | 772 / #311 / 0.048% |
| 1978 | 671 / #331 / 0.044% |
| 1977 | 495 / #412 / 0.032% |
| 1976 | 368 / #492 / 0.025% |
| 1975 | 378 / #488 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 335 / #513 / 0.023% |
| 1973 | 322 / #523 / 0.022% |
| 1972 | 364 / #488 / 0.024% |
| 1971 | 309 / #568 / 0.019% |
| 1970 | 329 / #559 / 0.019% |
| 1969 | 206 / #693 / 0.012% |
| 1968 | 167 / #775 / 0.010% |
| 1967 | 129 / #902 / 0.008% |
| 1966 | 152 / #803 / 0.009% |
| 1965 | 159 / #785 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 141 / #872 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 134 / #908 / 0.007% |
| 1962 | 135 / #912 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 161 / #827 / 0.008% |
| 1960 | 163 / #814 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 139 / #880 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 137 / #870 / 0.007% |
| 1957 | 111 / #985 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 115 / #940 / 0.006% |
| 1955 | 99 / #1004 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 125 / #841 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 102 / #934 / 0.005% |
| 1952 | 118 / #846 / 0.006% |
| 1951 | 127 / #789 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 130 / #758 / 0.008% |
| 1949 | 130 / #754 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 115 / #805 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 115 / #815 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 67 / #1033 / 0.004% |
| 1945 | 60 / #995 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 78 / #863 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 79 / #879 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 82 / #844 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 77 / #821 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 60 / #929 / 0.005% |
| 1939 | 50 / #997 / 0.005% |
| 1938 | 67 / #861 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 75 / #788 / 0.007% |
| 1936 | 94 / #687 / 0.009% |
| 1935 | 72 / #798 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 83 / #733 / 0.008% |
| 1933 | 81 / #732 / 0.008% |
| 1932 | 79 / #762 / 0.007% |
| 1931 | 84 / #735 / 0.008% |
| 1930 | 109 / #657 / 0.010% |
| 1929 | 97 / #711 / 0.009% |
| 1928 | 113 / #658 / 0.010% |
| 1927 | 111 / #688 / 0.009% |
| 1926 | 129 / #633 / 0.011% |
| 1925 | 127 / #652 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 157 / #588 / 0.013% |
| 1923 | 156 / #575 / 0.013% |
| 1922 | 162 / #562 / 0.013% |
| 1921 | 168 / #547 / 0.014% |
| 1920 | 181 / #524 / 0.015% |
| 1919 | 170 / #522 / 0.015% |
| 1918 | 178 / #517 / 0.015% |
| 1917 | 185 / #483 / 0.017% |
| 1916 | 166 / #506 / 0.016% |
| 1915 | 147 / #514 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 147 / #453 / 0.019% |
| 1913 | 124 / #444 / 0.020% |
| 1912 | 103 / #473 / 0.018% |
| 1911 | 94 / #418 / 0.022% |
| 1910 | 108 / #376 / 0.027% |
| 1909 | 86 / #396 / 0.025% |
| 1908 | 85 / #392 / 0.025% |
| 1907 | 87 / #378 / 0.027% |
| 1906 | 89 / #350 / 0.030% |
| 1905 | 101 / #338 / 0.035% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 75 / #378 / 0.027% |
| 1903 | 58 / #415 / 0.022% |
| 1902 | 86 / #343 / 0.033% |
| 1901 | 63 / #374 / 0.026% |
| 1900 | 85 / #366 / 0.028% |
| 1899 | 77 / #339 / 0.033% |
| 1898 | 98 / #318 / 0.038% |
| 1897 | 81 / #326 / 0.035% |
| 1896 | 94 / #300 / 0.040% |
| 1895 | 75 / #331 / 0.032% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 78 / #313 / 0.035% |
| 1893 | 67 / #329 / 0.031% |
| 1892 | 79 / #307 / 0.037% |
| 1891 | 75 / #291 / 0.040% |
| 1890 | 68 / #303 / 0.036% |
| 1889 | 66 / #299 / 0.037% |
| 1888 | 81 / #255 / 0.045% |
| 1887 | 52 / #296 / 0.036% |
| 1886 | 42 / #327 / 0.029% |
| 1885 | 60 / #255 / 0.045% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 45 / #285 / 0.035% |
| 1883 | 34 / #301 / 0.030% |
| 1882 | 44 / #262 / 0.041% |
| 1881 | 28 / #297 / 0.030% |
| 1880 | 33 / #271 / 0.036% |