Total babies named Cecelia (all years): 59,959
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 529 / #568 / 0.033% |
| 2023 | 616 / #497 / 0.038% |
| 2022 | 599 / #518 / 0.037% |
| 2021 | 548 / #560 / 0.033% |
| 2020 | 511 / #572 / 0.032% |
| 2019 | 557 / #546 / 0.033% |
| 2018 | 512 / #594 / 0.030% |
| 2017 | 585 / #529 / 0.034% |
| 2016 | 579 / #537 / 0.033% |
| 2015 | 572 / #544 / 0.032% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 535 / #571 / 0.030% |
| 2013 | 535 / #552 / 0.030% |
| 2012 | 484 / #596 / 0.027% |
| 2011 | 434 / #656 / 0.025% |
| 2010 | 377 / #739 / 0.021% |
| 2009 | 393 / #737 / 0.021% |
| 2008 | 387 / #761 / 0.020% |
| 2007 | 367 / #784 / 0.019% |
| 2006 | 423 / #673 / 0.022% |
| 2005 | 420 / #660 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 386 / #697 / 0.021% |
| 2003 | 341 / #746 / 0.019% |
| 2002 | 328 / #740 / 0.018% |
| 2001 | 313 / #763 / 0.017% |
| 2000 | 296 / #771 / 0.016% |
| 1999 | 291 / #761 / 0.016% |
| 1998 | 264 / #805 / 0.015% |
| 1997 | 232 / #875 / 0.013% |
| 1996 | 284 / #743 / 0.016% |
| 1995 | 248 / #800 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 232 / #853 / 0.013% |
| 1993 | 246 / #812 / 0.014% |
| 1992 | 206 / #941 / 0.011% |
| 1991 | 212 / #911 / 0.011% |
| 1990 | 231 / #849 / 0.012% |
| 1989 | 200 / #909 / 0.011% |
| 1988 | 215 / #837 / 0.012% |
| 1987 | 211 / #826 / 0.012% |
| 1986 | 173 / #926 / 0.010% |
| 1985 | 180 / #886 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 177 / #863 / 0.011% |
| 1983 | 187 / #820 / 0.011% |
| 1982 | 168 / #900 / 0.010% |
| 1981 | 153 / #956 / 0.009% |
| 1980 | 161 / #928 / 0.010% |
| 1979 | 151 / #959 / 0.009% |
| 1978 | 127 / #1057 / 0.008% |
| 1977 | 130 / #1027 / 0.008% |
| 1976 | 135 / #947 / 0.009% |
| 1975 | 167 / #818 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 165 / #815 / 0.011% |
| 1973 | 192 / #731 / 0.013% |
| 1972 | 212 / #691 / 0.014% |
| 1971 | 249 / #652 / 0.015% |
| 1970 | 309 / #575 / 0.018% |
| 1969 | 209 / #689 / 0.012% |
| 1968 | 269 / #583 / 0.016% |
| 1967 | 272 / #579 / 0.016% |
| 1966 | 286 / #563 / 0.017% |
| 1965 | 330 / #526 / 0.019% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 374 / #507 / 0.020% |
| 1963 | 470 / #446 / 0.024% |
| 1962 | 523 / #424 / 0.027% |
| 1961 | 565 / #410 / 0.028% |
| 1960 | 559 / #406 / 0.028% |
| 1959 | 670 / #370 / 0.033% |
| 1958 | 614 / #368 / 0.031% |
| 1957 | 681 / #346 / 0.033% |
| 1956 | 666 / #341 / 0.033% |
| 1955 | 655 / #332 / 0.034% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 679 / #325 / 0.035% |
| 1953 | 691 / #312 / 0.037% |
| 1952 | 713 / #298 / 0.038% |
| 1951 | 761 / #285 / 0.042% |
| 1950 | 768 / #277 / 0.045% |
| 1949 | 851 / #261 / 0.050% |
| 1948 | 843 / #263 / 0.050% |
| 1947 | 890 / #249 / 0.050% |
| 1946 | 712 / #272 / 0.045% |
| 1945 | 628 / #275 / 0.048% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 645 / #271 / 0.049% |
| 1943 | 782 / #246 / 0.056% |
| 1942 | 836 / #230 / 0.062% |
| 1941 | 609 / #258 / 0.050% |
| 1940 | 567 / #261 / 0.050% |
| 1939 | 534 / #268 / 0.049% |
| 1938 | 514 / #279 / 0.047% |
| 1937 | 474 / #283 / 0.045% |
| 1936 | 471 / #278 / 0.045% |
| 1935 | 409 / #301 / 0.039% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 374 / #323 / 0.036% |
| 1933 | 403 / #310 / 0.040% |
| 1932 | 434 / #304 / 0.041% |
| 1931 | 453 / #295 / 0.043% |
| 1930 | 526 / #286 / 0.047% |
| 1929 | 559 / #271 / 0.050% |
| 1928 | 579 / #270 / 0.050% |
| 1927 | 622 / #265 / 0.052% |
| 1926 | 685 / #251 / 0.058% |
| 1925 | 721 / #247 / 0.059% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 742 / #245 / 0.059% |
| 1923 | 786 / #234 / 0.065% |
| 1922 | 760 / #236 / 0.063% |
| 1921 | 825 / #226 / 0.067% |
| 1920 | 890 / #217 / 0.074% |
| 1919 | 867 / #212 / 0.077% |
| 1918 | 935 / #205 / 0.081% |
| 1917 | 920 / #201 / 0.085% |
| 1916 | 883 / #200 / 0.085% |
| 1915 | 821 / #200 / 0.083% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 679 / #196 / 0.089% |
| 1913 | 536 / #198 / 0.086% |
| 1912 | 513 / #191 / 0.092% |
| 1911 | 416 / #175 / 0.099% |
| 1910 | 335 / #196 / 0.084% |
| 1909 | 294 / #198 / 0.085% |
| 1908 | 325 / #178 / 0.097% |
| 1907 | 321 / #174 / 0.101% |
| 1906 | 290 / #175 / 0.098% |
| 1905 | 293 / #175 / 0.100% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 272 / #178 / 0.099% |
| 1903 | 242 / #189 / 0.092% |
| 1902 | 243 / #187 / 0.092% |
| 1901 | 249 / #176 / 0.104% |
| 1900 | 264 / #195 / 0.088% |
| 1899 | 214 / #190 / 0.092% |
| 1898 | 229 / #192 / 0.089% |
| 1897 | 212 / #187 / 0.091% |
| 1896 | 190 / #200 / 0.080% |
| 1895 | 163 / #213 / 0.070% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 159 / #212 / 0.071% |
| 1893 | 182 / #192 / 0.085% |
| 1892 | 175 / #191 / 0.082% |
| 1891 | 130 / #205 / 0.070% |
| 1890 | 130 / #211 / 0.068% |
| 1889 | 138 / #193 / 0.077% |
| 1888 | 113 / #216 / 0.063% |
| 1887 | 92 / #216 / 0.063% |
| 1886 | 96 / #201 / 0.066% |
| 1885 | 84 / #215 / 0.063% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 109 / #169 / 0.084% |
| 1883 | 67 / #218 / 0.060% |
| 1882 | 55 / #233 / 0.051% |
| 1881 | 51 / #213 / 0.055% |
| 1880 | 47 / #226 / 0.052% |