Total babies named Chloe (all years): 248,457
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 6,385 / #20 / 0.396% |
| 2023 | 5,987 / #26 / 0.374% |
| 2022 | 6,476 / #19 / 0.395% |
| 2021 | 6,343 / #25 / 0.387% |
| 2020 | 6,145 / #26 / 0.380% |
| 2019 | 6,411 / #24 / 0.382% |
| 2018 | 6,677 / #25 / 0.393% |
| 2017 | 6,981 / #22 / 0.404% |
| 2016 | 7,481 / #20 / 0.422% |
| 2015 | 7,950 / #17 / 0.445% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 8,562 / #18 / 0.479% |
| 2013 | 8,798 / #14 / 0.501% |
| 2012 | 9,670 / #11 / 0.549% |
| 2011 | 11,007 / #10 / 0.626% |
| 2010 | 11,763 / #9 / 0.662% |
| 2009 | 11,918 / #9 / 0.649% |
| 2008 | 11,835 / #10 / 0.626% |
| 2007 | 10,759 / #16 / 0.560% |
| 2006 | 10,403 / #18 / 0.547% |
| 2005 | 9,598 / #19 / 0.519% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 8,729 / #23 / 0.475% |
| 2003 | 9,082 / #24 / 0.497% |
| 2002 | 8,902 / #25 / 0.495% |
| 2001 | 8,177 / #30 / 0.454% |
| 2000 | 7,094 / #38 / 0.391% |
| 1999 | 4,964 / #63 / 0.280% |
| 1998 | 3,794 / #87 / 0.215% |
| 1997 | 3,015 / #109 / 0.173% |
| 1996 | 2,780 / #112 / 0.159% |
| 1995 | 2,332 / #136 / 0.133% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 2,079 / #155 / 0.116% |
| 1993 | 1,957 / #158 / 0.108% |
| 1992 | 1,893 / #161 / 0.103% |
| 1991 | 1,671 / #179 / 0.089% |
| 1990 | 1,371 / #212 / 0.072% |
| 1989 | 863 / #302 / 0.047% |
| 1988 | 475 / #479 / 0.027% |
| 1987 | 507 / #439 / 0.029% |
| 1986 | 466 / #462 / 0.027% |
| 1985 | 351 / #563 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 309 / #587 / 0.018% |
| 1983 | 182 / #842 / 0.011% |
| 1982 | 183 / #850 / 0.011% |
| 1981 | 130 / #1079 / 0.008% |
| 1980 | 139 / #1031 / 0.008% |
| 1979 | 100 / #1274 / 0.006% |
| 1978 | 118 / #1105 / 0.008% |
| 1977 | 93 / #1276 / 0.006% |
| 1976 | 85 / #1287 / 0.006% |
| 1975 | 66 / #1531 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 52 / #1737 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 46 / #1835 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 30 / #2402 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 29 / #2549 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 25 / #2793 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 27 / #2535 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 23 / #2641 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 19 / #2885 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 15 / #3281 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 15 / #3283 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 22 / #2687 / 0.001% |
| 1963 | 21 / #2716 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 24 / #2472 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 17 / #3074 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 21 / #2660 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 38 / #1798 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 17 / #2873 / 0.001% |
| 1957 | 19 / #2669 / 0.001% |
| 1956 | 24 / #2262 / 0.001% |
| 1955 | 25 / #2163 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 30 / #1912 / 0.002% |
| 1953 | 42 / #1508 / 0.002% |
| 1952 | 26 / #1983 / 0.001% |
| 1951 | 38 / #1531 / 0.002% |
| 1950 | 37 / #1530 / 0.002% |
| 1949 | 31 / #1707 / 0.002% |
| 1948 | 38 / #1499 / 0.002% |
| 1947 | 49 / #1304 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 57 / #1121 / 0.004% |
| 1945 | 34 / #1380 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 47 / #1142 / 0.004% |
| 1943 | 68 / #953 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 66 / #961 / 0.005% |
| 1941 | 78 / #816 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 75 / #820 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 66 / #862 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 81 / #775 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 83 / #747 / 0.008% |
| 1936 | 91 / #700 / 0.009% |
| 1935 | 71 / #805 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 78 / #756 / 0.007% |
| 1933 | 73 / #769 / 0.007% |
| 1932 | 81 / #748 / 0.008% |
| 1931 | 60 / #889 / 0.006% |
| 1930 | 94 / #719 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 75 / #815 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 64 / #926 / 0.006% |
| 1927 | 67 / #914 / 0.006% |
| 1926 | 64 / #932 / 0.005% |
| 1925 | 62 / #947 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 78 / #850 / 0.006% |
| 1923 | 72 / #866 / 0.006% |
| 1922 | 74 / #855 / 0.006% |
| 1921 | 92 / #762 / 0.007% |
| 1920 | 98 / #730 / 0.008% |
| 1919 | 75 / #812 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 99 / #724 / 0.009% |
| 1917 | 104 / #666 / 0.010% |
| 1916 | 127 / #596 / 0.012% |
| 1915 | 119 / #600 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 68 / #702 / 0.009% |
| 1913 | 70 / #618 / 0.011% |
| 1912 | 69 / #583 / 0.012% |
| 1911 | 69 / #496 / 0.016% |
| 1910 | 50 / #586 / 0.013% |
| 1909 | 40 / #614 / 0.012% |
| 1908 | 42 / #575 / 0.013% |
| 1907 | 43 / #556 / 0.014% |
| 1906 | 52 / #472 / 0.018% |
| 1905 | 42 / #530 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 52 / #452 / 0.019% |
| 1903 | 56 / #426 / 0.021% |
| 1902 | 42 / #485 / 0.016% |
| 1901 | 37 / #501 / 0.015% |
| 1900 | 72 / #390 / 0.024% |
| 1899 | 54 / #391 / 0.023% |
| 1898 | 65 / #385 / 0.025% |
| 1897 | 50 / #415 / 0.021% |
| 1896 | 53 / #387 / 0.022% |
| 1895 | 73 / #334 / 0.031% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 67 / #340 / 0.030% |
| 1893 | 76 / #311 / 0.036% |
| 1892 | 76 / #311 / 0.036% |
| 1891 | 48 / #359 / 0.026% |
| 1890 | 60 / #326 / 0.032% |
| 1889 | 64 / #301 / 0.036% |
| 1888 | 62 / #304 / 0.035% |
| 1887 | 41 / #333 / 0.028% |
| 1886 | 34 / #366 / 0.024% |
| 1885 | 34 / #342 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 36 / #327 / 0.028% |
| 1883 | 19 / #437 / 0.017% |
| 1882 | 33 / #307 / 0.031% |
| 1881 | 14 / #450 / 0.015% |
| 1880 | 20 / #367 / 0.022% |