Total babies named Clayton (all years): 138,819
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,081 / #317 / 0.063% |
| 2023 | 1,067 / #310 / 0.062% |
| 2022 | 1,199 / #286 / 0.069% |
| 2021 | 1,236 / #279 / 0.071% |
| 2020 | 1,172 / #289 / 0.068% |
| 2019 | 1,308 / #273 / 0.073% |
| 2018 | 1,451 / #254 / 0.080% |
| 2017 | 1,493 / #250 / 0.081% |
| 2016 | 1,376 / #266 / 0.073% |
| 2015 | 1,479 / #248 / 0.077% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,364 / #271 / 0.071% |
| 2013 | 1,386 / #258 / 0.073% |
| 2012 | 1,367 / #261 / 0.072% |
| 2011 | 1,345 / #257 / 0.071% |
| 2010 | 1,361 / #251 / 0.071% |
| 2009 | 1,263 / #272 / 0.064% |
| 2008 | 1,577 / #234 / 0.077% |
| 2007 | 1,446 / #247 / 0.070% |
| 2006 | 1,595 / #226 / 0.078% |
| 2005 | 1,662 / #216 / 0.083% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,923 / #198 / 0.097% |
| 2003 | 2,130 / #183 / 0.108% |
| 2002 | 2,160 / #178 / 0.111% |
| 2001 | 2,351 / #162 / 0.121% |
| 2000 | 2,564 / #151 / 0.131% |
| 1999 | 2,343 / #157 / 0.122% |
| 1998 | 2,267 / #150 / 0.119% |
| 1997 | 2,319 / #147 / 0.123% |
| 1996 | 2,339 / #149 / 0.123% |
| 1995 | 2,361 / #151 / 0.124% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 2,371 / #149 / 0.123% |
| 1993 | 2,031 / #159 / 0.104% |
| 1992 | 1,909 / #168 / 0.096% |
| 1991 | 1,847 / #172 / 0.091% |
| 1990 | 2,028 / #153 / 0.099% |
| 1989 | 1,962 / #154 / 0.098% |
| 1988 | 1,890 / #147 / 0.099% |
| 1987 | 1,815 / #153 / 0.097% |
| 1986 | 1,673 / #161 / 0.091% |
| 1985 | 1,718 / #157 / 0.093% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,818 / #150 / 0.101% |
| 1983 | 1,728 / #158 / 0.096% |
| 1982 | 1,705 / #161 / 0.094% |
| 1981 | 1,349 / #185 / 0.075% |
| 1980 | 1,276 / #194 / 0.072% |
| 1979 | 1,209 / #199 / 0.070% |
| 1978 | 1,083 / #203 / 0.066% |
| 1977 | 1,165 / #197 / 0.071% |
| 1976 | 1,186 / #187 / 0.076% |
| 1975 | 1,176 / #193 / 0.075% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 1,091 / #203 / 0.069% |
| 1973 | 1,106 / #199 / 0.071% |
| 1972 | 933 / #230 / 0.058% |
| 1971 | 967 / #239 / 0.055% |
| 1970 | 834 / #264 / 0.045% |
| 1969 | 800 / #260 / 0.045% |
| 1968 | 758 / #264 / 0.044% |
| 1967 | 746 / #266 / 0.043% |
| 1966 | 776 / #260 / 0.044% |
| 1965 | 882 / #251 / 0.047% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 933 / #251 / 0.047% |
| 1963 | 1,023 / #234 / 0.050% |
| 1962 | 971 / #250 / 0.047% |
| 1961 | 1,162 / #231 / 0.055% |
| 1960 | 1,247 / #222 / 0.058% |
| 1959 | 1,134 / #238 / 0.053% |
| 1958 | 1,127 / #232 / 0.053% |
| 1957 | 1,019 / #243 / 0.047% |
| 1956 | 962 / #234 / 0.045% |
| 1955 | 925 / #234 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 843 / #239 / 0.041% |
| 1953 | 871 / #230 / 0.044% |
| 1952 | 859 / #228 / 0.044% |
| 1951 | 814 / #233 / 0.043% |
| 1950 | 754 / #241 / 0.042% |
| 1949 | 749 / #236 / 0.042% |
| 1948 | 721 / #238 / 0.041% |
| 1947 | 812 / #225 / 0.044% |
| 1946 | 752 / #221 / 0.046% |
| 1945 | 638 / #218 / 0.047% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 658 / #212 / 0.048% |
| 1943 | 766 / #206 / 0.054% |
| 1942 | 698 / #213 / 0.051% |
| 1941 | 663 / #205 / 0.054% |
| 1940 | 603 / #212 / 0.052% |
| 1939 | 632 / #197 / 0.057% |
| 1938 | 640 / #199 / 0.058% |
| 1937 | 701 / #188 / 0.066% |
| 1936 | 706 / #186 / 0.068% |
| 1935 | 700 / #187 / 0.067% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 717 / #183 / 0.069% |
| 1933 | 655 / #188 / 0.066% |
| 1932 | 787 / #175 / 0.075% |
| 1931 | 831 / #168 / 0.080% |
| 1930 | 802 / #178 / 0.073% |
| 1929 | 855 / #166 / 0.079% |
| 1928 | 833 / #173 / 0.075% |
| 1927 | 919 / #163 / 0.082% |
| 1926 | 956 / #161 / 0.086% |
| 1925 | 932 / #162 / 0.084% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,039 / #153 / 0.092% |
| 1923 | 989 / #158 / 0.090% |
| 1922 | 979 / #160 / 0.090% |
| 1921 | 951 / #158 / 0.086% |
| 1920 | 961 / #153 / 0.090% |
| 1919 | 901 / #149 / 0.092% |
| 1918 | 877 / #157 / 0.087% |
| 1917 | 759 / #166 / 0.082% |
| 1916 | 753 / #159 / 0.085% |
| 1915 | 699 / #165 / 0.082% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 563 / #158 / 0.086% |
| 1913 | 381 / #181 / 0.074% |
| 1912 | 346 / #169 / 0.080% |
| 1911 | 203 / #165 / 0.090% |
| 1910 | 159 / #178 / 0.082% |
| 1909 | 137 / #176 / 0.084% |
| 1908 | 134 / #170 / 0.087% |
| 1907 | 108 / #192 / 0.074% |
| 1906 | 100 / #180 / 0.075% |
| 1905 | 110 / #174 / 0.083% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 96 / #188 / 0.075% |
| 1903 | 85 / #189 / 0.071% |
| 1902 | 97 / #175 / 0.079% |
| 1901 | 72 / #198 / 0.068% |
| 1900 | 118 / #176 / 0.078% |
| 1899 | 61 / #214 / 0.057% |
| 1898 | 87 / #180 / 0.071% |
| 1897 | 75 / #196 / 0.067% |
| 1896 | 102 / #161 / 0.085% |
| 1895 | 86 / #183 / 0.073% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 63 / #212 / 0.054% |
| 1893 | 78 / #187 / 0.069% |
| 1892 | 59 / #228 / 0.048% |
| 1891 | 64 / #194 / 0.063% |
| 1890 | 77 / #176 / 0.069% |
| 1889 | 76 / #176 / 0.069% |
| 1888 | 63 / #221 / 0.052% |
| 1887 | 74 / #173 / 0.073% |
| 1886 | 73 / #182 / 0.066% |
| 1885 | 68 / #192 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 69 / #193 / 0.060% |
| 1883 | 58 / #199 / 0.055% |
| 1882 | 60 / #210 / 0.053% |
| 1881 | 52 / #212 / 0.052% |
| 1880 | 60 / #201 / 0.054% |