Total babies named Cleo (all years): 44,552
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 495 / #603 / 0.031% |
| 2023 | 488 / #610 / 0.030% |
| 2022 | 445 / #663 / 0.027% |
| 2021 | 355 / #796 / 0.022% |
| 2020 | 303 / #882 / 0.019% |
| 2019 | 270 / #968 / 0.016% |
| 2018 | 222 / #1109 / 0.013% |
| 2017 | 153 / #1468 / 0.009% |
| 2016 | 144 / #1551 / 0.008% |
| 2015 | 119 / #1759 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 100 / #1986 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 81 / #2287 / 0.005% |
| 2012 | 124 / #1690 / 0.007% |
| 2011 | 87 / #2175 / 0.005% |
| 2010 | 78 / #2408 / 0.004% |
| 2009 | 72 / #2574 / 0.004% |
| 2008 | 48 / #3438 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 63 / #2866 / 0.003% |
| 2006 | 58 / #2945 / 0.003% |
| 2005 | 51 / #3091 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 51 / #3039 / 0.003% |
| 2003 | 58 / #2714 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 69 / #2334 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 74 / #2198 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 66 / #2342 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 50 / #2747 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 61 / #2314 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 56 / #2365 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 59 / #2259 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 39 / #2987 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 41 / #2887 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 35 / #3234 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 53 / #2438 / 0.003% |
| 1991 | 38 / #2994 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 39 / #2915 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 30 / #3417 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 33 / #3050 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 38 / #2618 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 39 / #2520 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 39 / #2493 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 23 / #3535 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 29 / #2918 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 24 / #3436 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 25 / #3354 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 29 / #3013 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 36 / #2537 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 31 / #2693 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 32 / #2619 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 24 / #3023 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 28 / #2694 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 40 / #2073 / 0.003% |
| 1973 | 40 / #2025 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 35 / #2177 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 34 / #2299 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 31 / #2404 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 33 / #2216 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 37 / #1981 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 39 / #1887 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 53 / #1534 / 0.003% |
| 1965 | 60 / #1425 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 75 / #1281 / 0.004% |
| 1963 | 55 / #1512 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 79 / #1237 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 76 / #1271 / 0.004% |
| 1960 | 71 / #1301 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 94 / #1106 / 0.005% |
| 1958 | 98 / #1062 / 0.005% |
| 1957 | 106 / #1015 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 142 / #830 / 0.007% |
| 1955 | 147 / #796 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 143 / #782 / 0.007% |
| 1953 | 135 / #794 / 0.007% |
| 1952 | 167 / #689 / 0.009% |
| 1951 | 133 / #765 / 0.007% |
| 1950 | 156 / #686 / 0.009% |
| 1949 | 164 / #647 / 0.010% |
| 1948 | 168 / #643 / 0.010% |
| 1947 | 212 / #584 / 0.012% |
| 1946 | 203 / #556 / 0.013% |
| 1945 | 182 / #542 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 213 / #494 / 0.016% |
| 1943 | 244 / #470 / 0.017% |
| 1942 | 277 / #438 / 0.021% |
| 1941 | 275 / #414 / 0.023% |
| 1940 | 301 / #384 / 0.026% |
| 1939 | 312 / #372 / 0.028% |
| 1938 | 387 / #318 / 0.035% |
| 1937 | 391 / #313 / 0.037% |
| 1936 | 350 / #333 / 0.034% |
| 1935 | 426 / #291 / 0.041% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 448 / #288 / 0.043% |
| 1933 | 417 / #297 / 0.041% |
| 1932 | 455 / #294 / 0.043% |
| 1931 | 482 / #284 / 0.045% |
| 1930 | 515 / #290 / 0.046% |
| 1929 | 584 / #263 / 0.052% |
| 1928 | 606 / #263 / 0.053% |
| 1927 | 662 / #256 / 0.056% |
| 1926 | 730 / #240 / 0.062% |
| 1925 | 812 / #229 / 0.067% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 909 / #218 / 0.073% |
| 1923 | 883 / #216 / 0.073% |
| 1922 | 991 / #202 / 0.083% |
| 1921 | 992 / #201 / 0.080% |
| 1920 | 1,049 / #191 / 0.088% |
| 1919 | 1,013 / #190 / 0.090% |
| 1918 | 1,009 / #197 / 0.087% |
| 1917 | 1,009 / #189 / 0.093% |
| 1916 | 1,031 / #180 / 0.099% |
| 1915 | 914 / #184 / 0.093% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 672 / #197 / 0.088% |
| 1913 | 536 / #199 / 0.086% |
| 1912 | 469 / #204 / 0.084% |
| 1911 | 358 / #200 / 0.086% |
| 1910 | 357 / #190 / 0.090% |
| 1909 | 333 / #178 / 0.096% |
| 1908 | 290 / #191 / 0.087% |
| 1907 | 325 / #171 / 0.102% |
| 1906 | 238 / #200 / 0.081% |
| 1905 | 248 / #193 / 0.085% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 230 / #195 / 0.084% |
| 1903 | 221 / #190 / 0.084% |
| 1902 | 198 / #211 / 0.075% |
| 1901 | 160 / #229 / 0.067% |
| 1900 | 198 / #226 / 0.066% |
| 1899 | 132 / #241 / 0.057% |
| 1898 | 139 / #253 / 0.054% |
| 1897 | 131 / #245 / 0.056% |
| 1896 | 134 / #237 / 0.056% |
| 1895 | 125 / #252 / 0.054% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 118 / #251 / 0.053% |
| 1893 | 122 / #238 / 0.057% |
| 1892 | 95 / #273 / 0.045% |
| 1891 | 76 / #287 / 0.041% |
| 1890 | 81 / #279 / 0.043% |
| 1889 | 70 / #283 / 0.039% |
| 1888 | 63 / #296 / 0.035% |
| 1887 | 37 / #354 / 0.025% |
| 1886 | 42 / #328 / 0.029% |
| 1885 | 32 / #356 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 30 / #367 / 0.023% |
| 1883 | 26 / #355 / 0.023% |
| 1882 | 18 / #436 / 0.017% |
| 1881 | 23 / #340 / 0.025% |
| 1880 | 17 / #406 / 0.019% |