Total babies named Clifton (all years): 70,600
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 94 / #1746 / 0.005% |
| 2023 | 105 / #1640 / 0.006% |
| 2022 | 78 / #1969 / 0.004% |
| 2021 | 91 / #1765 / 0.005% |
| 2020 | 112 / #1506 / 0.006% |
| 2019 | 103 / #1606 / 0.006% |
| 2018 | 102 / #1608 / 0.006% |
| 2017 | 110 / #1512 / 0.006% |
| 2016 | 90 / #1726 / 0.005% |
| 2015 | 112 / #1481 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 119 / #1415 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 110 / #1484 / 0.006% |
| 2012 | 130 / #1317 / 0.007% |
| 2011 | 112 / #1461 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 107 / #1519 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 132 / #1315 / 0.007% |
| 2008 | 131 / #1325 / 0.006% |
| 2007 | 154 / #1154 / 0.007% |
| 2006 | 146 / #1154 / 0.007% |
| 2005 | 156 / #1062 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 159 / #1029 / 0.008% |
| 2003 | 173 / #946 / 0.009% |
| 2002 | 163 / #970 / 0.008% |
| 2001 | 201 / #819 / 0.010% |
| 2000 | 232 / #739 / 0.012% |
| 1999 | 215 / #747 / 0.011% |
| 1998 | 240 / #696 / 0.013% |
| 1997 | 221 / #715 / 0.012% |
| 1996 | 232 / #695 / 0.012% |
| 1995 | 249 / #664 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 267 / #635 / 0.014% |
| 1993 | 311 / #585 / 0.016% |
| 1992 | 355 / #537 / 0.018% |
| 1991 | 411 / #490 / 0.020% |
| 1990 | 440 / #473 / 0.021% |
| 1989 | 506 / #413 / 0.025% |
| 1988 | 518 / #382 / 0.027% |
| 1987 | 552 / #351 / 0.030% |
| 1986 | 609 / #326 / 0.033% |
| 1985 | 643 / #317 / 0.035% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 644 / #304 / 0.036% |
| 1983 | 609 / #317 / 0.034% |
| 1982 | 718 / #285 / 0.040% |
| 1981 | 788 / #272 / 0.044% |
| 1980 | 804 / #269 / 0.045% |
| 1979 | 782 / #266 / 0.045% |
| 1978 | 863 / #242 / 0.053% |
| 1977 | 828 / #247 / 0.050% |
| 1976 | 871 / #233 / 0.056% |
| 1975 | 1,214 / #186 / 0.078% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 753 / #257 / 0.048% |
| 1973 | 556 / #316 / 0.036% |
| 1972 | 623 / #297 / 0.038% |
| 1971 | 643 / #304 / 0.036% |
| 1970 | 672 / #300 / 0.036% |
| 1969 | 665 / #293 / 0.037% |
| 1968 | 683 / #281 / 0.039% |
| 1967 | 665 / #280 / 0.038% |
| 1966 | 696 / #277 / 0.039% |
| 1965 | 685 / #287 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 836 / #266 / 0.042% |
| 1963 | 789 / #273 / 0.039% |
| 1962 | 855 / #262 / 0.041% |
| 1961 | 868 / #270 / 0.041% |
| 1960 | 873 / #270 / 0.041% |
| 1959 | 926 / #262 / 0.043% |
| 1958 | 999 / #250 / 0.047% |
| 1957 | 1,057 / #235 / 0.049% |
| 1956 | 998 / #232 / 0.047% |
| 1955 | 982 / #227 / 0.048% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,038 / #215 / 0.051% |
| 1953 | 960 / #218 / 0.049% |
| 1952 | 942 / #214 / 0.048% |
| 1951 | 955 / #208 / 0.051% |
| 1950 | 1,024 / #201 / 0.057% |
| 1949 | 982 / #204 / 0.055% |
| 1948 | 944 / #205 / 0.054% |
| 1947 | 965 / #204 / 0.053% |
| 1946 | 802 / #214 / 0.049% |
| 1945 | 722 / #199 / 0.054% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 765 / #195 / 0.056% |
| 1943 | 857 / #187 / 0.060% |
| 1942 | 793 / #198 / 0.057% |
| 1941 | 675 / #203 / 0.055% |
| 1940 | 643 / #202 / 0.055% |
| 1939 | 662 / #194 / 0.060% |
| 1938 | 648 / #197 / 0.058% |
| 1937 | 669 / #193 / 0.063% |
| 1936 | 640 / #193 / 0.062% |
| 1935 | 648 / #196 / 0.062% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 666 / #189 / 0.065% |
| 1933 | 733 / #177 / 0.074% |
| 1932 | 739 / #183 / 0.071% |
| 1931 | 697 / #188 / 0.067% |
| 1930 | 755 / #184 / 0.069% |
| 1929 | 781 / #178 / 0.073% |
| 1928 | 781 / #183 / 0.071% |
| 1927 | 919 / #164 / 0.082% |
| 1926 | 884 / #165 / 0.080% |
| 1925 | 891 / #171 / 0.080% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 847 / #172 / 0.075% |
| 1923 | 900 / #166 / 0.082% |
| 1922 | 887 / #168 / 0.082% |
| 1921 | 932 / #160 / 0.085% |
| 1920 | 910 / #157 / 0.086% |
| 1919 | 885 / #150 / 0.090% |
| 1918 | 934 / #152 / 0.092% |
| 1917 | 794 / #159 / 0.086% |
| 1916 | 770 / #156 / 0.087% |
| 1915 | 820 / #144 / 0.097% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 616 / #150 / 0.094% |
| 1913 | 497 / #149 / 0.097% |
| 1912 | 404 / #148 / 0.094% |
| 1911 | 206 / #163 / 0.091% |
| 1910 | 178 / #168 / 0.092% |
| 1909 | 157 / #159 / 0.096% |
| 1908 | 143 / #162 / 0.093% |
| 1907 | 126 / #172 / 0.086% |
| 1906 | 105 / #174 / 0.079% |
| 1905 | 121 / #165 / 0.091% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 115 / #164 / 0.090% |
| 1903 | 110 / #159 / 0.092% |
| 1902 | 112 / #156 / 0.091% |
| 1901 | 101 / #154 / 0.095% |
| 1900 | 107 / #190 / 0.071% |
| 1899 | 94 / #161 / 0.089% |
| 1898 | 83 / #186 / 0.068% |
| 1897 | 78 / #194 / 0.069% |
| 1896 | 95 / #168 / 0.079% |
| 1895 | 92 / #169 / 0.078% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 93 / #166 / 0.080% |
| 1893 | 75 / #194 / 0.067% |
| 1892 | 68 / #213 / 0.056% |
| 1891 | 80 / #161 / 0.079% |
| 1890 | 57 / #219 / 0.051% |
| 1889 | 59 / #217 / 0.053% |
| 1888 | 64 / #219 / 0.053% |
| 1887 | 43 / #244 / 0.042% |
| 1886 | 42 / #262 / 0.038% |
| 1885 | 54 / #221 / 0.050% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 40 / #270 / 0.035% |
| 1883 | 26 / #324 / 0.025% |
| 1882 | 51 / #232 / 0.045% |
| 1881 | 39 / #253 / 0.039% |
| 1880 | 38 / #273 / 0.034% |