Total babies named Edmond (all years): 24,827
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 63 / #2262 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 58 / #2368 / 0.003% |
| 2022 | 78 / #1972 / 0.004% |
| 2021 | 68 / #2114 / 0.004% |
| 2020 | 62 / #2216 / 0.004% |
| 2019 | 75 / #1960 / 0.004% |
| 2018 | 76 / #1944 / 0.004% |
| 2017 | 62 / #2172 / 0.003% |
| 2016 | 69 / #2050 / 0.004% |
| 2015 | 76 / #1917 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 80 / #1846 / 0.004% |
| 2013 | 76 / #1870 / 0.004% |
| 2012 | 83 / #1787 / 0.004% |
| 2011 | 61 / #2154 / 0.003% |
| 2010 | 71 / #1963 / 0.004% |
| 2009 | 75 / #1914 / 0.004% |
| 2008 | 65 / #2107 / 0.003% |
| 2007 | 102 / #1541 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 77 / #1794 / 0.004% |
| 2005 | 68 / #1873 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 84 / #1569 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 76 / #1651 / 0.004% |
| 2002 | 82 / #1519 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 79 / #1529 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 90 / #1393 / 0.005% |
| 1999 | 67 / #1613 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 97 / #1252 / 0.005% |
| 1997 | 85 / #1329 / 0.005% |
| 1996 | 68 / #1484 / 0.004% |
| 1995 | 106 / #1104 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 100 / #1137 / 0.005% |
| 1993 | 103 / #1106 / 0.005% |
| 1992 | 110 / #1045 / 0.006% |
| 1991 | 98 / #1109 / 0.005% |
| 1990 | 93 / #1112 / 0.005% |
| 1989 | 110 / #977 / 0.006% |
| 1988 | 126 / #848 / 0.007% |
| 1987 | 106 / #914 / 0.006% |
| 1986 | 93 / #948 / 0.005% |
| 1985 | 116 / #834 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 122 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1983 | 106 / #850 / 0.006% |
| 1982 | 143 / #725 / 0.008% |
| 1981 | 145 / #718 / 0.008% |
| 1980 | 158 / #690 / 0.009% |
| 1979 | 200 / #607 / 0.012% |
| 1978 | 195 / #598 / 0.012% |
| 1977 | 165 / #658 / 0.010% |
| 1976 | 124 / #746 / 0.008% |
| 1975 | 134 / #718 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 114 / #758 / 0.007% |
| 1973 | 138 / #678 / 0.009% |
| 1972 | 128 / #710 / 0.008% |
| 1971 | 163 / #644 / 0.009% |
| 1970 | 189 / #591 / 0.010% |
| 1969 | 185 / #576 / 0.010% |
| 1968 | 182 / #562 / 0.010% |
| 1967 | 181 / #556 / 0.010% |
| 1966 | 179 / #569 / 0.010% |
| 1965 | 208 / #534 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 209 / #545 / 0.010% |
| 1963 | 255 / #502 / 0.013% |
| 1962 | 233 / #518 / 0.011% |
| 1961 | 243 / #509 / 0.011% |
| 1960 | 269 / #483 / 0.013% |
| 1959 | 265 / #480 / 0.012% |
| 1958 | 265 / #480 / 0.012% |
| 1957 | 324 / #430 / 0.015% |
| 1956 | 321 / #421 / 0.015% |
| 1955 | 335 / #397 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 306 / #411 / 0.015% |
| 1953 | 337 / #376 / 0.017% |
| 1952 | 296 / #402 / 0.015% |
| 1951 | 346 / #368 / 0.018% |
| 1950 | 317 / #380 / 0.018% |
| 1949 | 293 / #391 / 0.017% |
| 1948 | 366 / #350 / 0.021% |
| 1947 | 354 / #366 / 0.019% |
| 1946 | 314 / #367 / 0.019% |
| 1945 | 269 / #363 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 271 / #366 / 0.020% |
| 1943 | 322 / #342 / 0.023% |
| 1942 | 296 / #354 / 0.021% |
| 1941 | 282 / #346 / 0.023% |
| 1940 | 273 / #344 / 0.024% |
| 1939 | 281 / #330 / 0.025% |
| 1938 | 260 / #346 / 0.023% |
| 1937 | 264 / #334 / 0.025% |
| 1936 | 312 / #302 / 0.030% |
| 1935 | 278 / #326 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 287 / #320 / 0.028% |
| 1933 | 289 / #317 / 0.029% |
| 1932 | 294 / #322 / 0.028% |
| 1931 | 316 / #307 / 0.030% |
| 1930 | 360 / #301 / 0.033% |
| 1929 | 319 / #309 / 0.030% |
| 1928 | 406 / #279 / 0.037% |
| 1927 | 377 / #294 / 0.033% |
| 1926 | 376 / #292 / 0.034% |
| 1925 | 400 / #286 / 0.036% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 402 / #287 / 0.035% |
| 1923 | 343 / #307 / 0.031% |
| 1922 | 388 / #281 / 0.036% |
| 1921 | 398 / #279 / 0.036% |
| 1920 | 433 / #266 / 0.041% |
| 1919 | 396 / #267 / 0.040% |
| 1918 | 427 / #261 / 0.042% |
| 1917 | 358 / #268 / 0.039% |
| 1916 | 365 / #259 / 0.041% |
| 1915 | 323 / #271 / 0.038% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 269 / #265 / 0.041% |
| 1913 | 200 / #273 / 0.039% |
| 1912 | 200 / #250 / 0.047% |
| 1911 | 91 / #273 / 0.040% |
| 1910 | 98 / #241 / 0.050% |
| 1909 | 68 / #270 / 0.041% |
| 1908 | 88 / #219 / 0.057% |
| 1907 | 68 / #254 / 0.046% |
| 1906 | 52 / #274 / 0.039% |
| 1905 | 48 / #288 / 0.036% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 53 / #262 / 0.041% |
| 1903 | 44 / #283 / 0.037% |
| 1902 | 49 / #268 / 0.040% |
| 1901 | 41 / #268 / 0.039% |
| 1900 | 47 / #306 / 0.031% |
| 1899 | 41 / #271 / 0.039% |
| 1898 | 42 / #280 / 0.034% |
| 1897 | 47 / #256 / 0.042% |
| 1896 | 58 / #239 / 0.049% |
| 1895 | 50 / #255 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 50 / #244 / 0.043% |
| 1893 | 50 / #248 / 0.045% |
| 1892 | 40 / #289 / 0.033% |
| 1891 | 40 / #252 / 0.040% |
| 1890 | 51 / #234 / 0.046% |
| 1889 | 44 / #244 / 0.040% |
| 1888 | 43 / #273 / 0.036% |
| 1887 | 36 / #271 / 0.036% |
| 1886 | 50 / #237 / 0.045% |
| 1885 | 36 / #277 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 43 / #261 / 0.038% |
| 1883 | 52 / #210 / 0.050% |
| 1882 | 39 / #274 / 0.034% |
| 1881 | 42 / #239 / 0.042% |
| 1880 | 44 / #251 / 0.040% |