Total babies named Edmund (all years): 51,943
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 175 / #1182 / 0.010% |
| 2023 | 194 / #1098 / 0.011% |
| 2022 | 168 / #1191 / 0.010% |
| 2021 | 173 / #1156 / 0.010% |
| 2020 | 122 / #1417 / 0.007% |
| 2019 | 160 / #1194 / 0.009% |
| 2018 | 168 / #1144 / 0.009% |
| 2017 | 163 / #1157 / 0.009% |
| 2016 | 192 / #1035 / 0.010% |
| 2015 | 173 / #1112 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 176 / #1089 / 0.009% |
| 2013 | 152 / #1182 / 0.008% |
| 2012 | 138 / #1276 / 0.007% |
| 2011 | 111 / #1471 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 95 / #1647 / 0.005% |
| 2009 | 125 / #1371 / 0.006% |
| 2008 | 118 / #1425 / 0.006% |
| 2007 | 99 / #1583 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 97 / #1538 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 103 / #1432 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 118 / #1274 / 0.006% |
| 2003 | 117 / #1235 / 0.006% |
| 2002 | 113 / #1216 / 0.006% |
| 2001 | 115 / #1186 / 0.006% |
| 2000 | 122 / #1138 / 0.006% |
| 1999 | 127 / #1069 / 0.007% |
| 1998 | 119 / #1089 / 0.006% |
| 1997 | 147 / #924 / 0.008% |
| 1996 | 128 / #981 / 0.007% |
| 1995 | 116 / #1035 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 143 / #913 / 0.007% |
| 1993 | 132 / #938 / 0.007% |
| 1992 | 145 / #878 / 0.007% |
| 1991 | 147 / #867 / 0.007% |
| 1990 | 155 / #819 / 0.008% |
| 1989 | 159 / #787 / 0.008% |
| 1988 | 162 / #744 / 0.008% |
| 1987 | 189 / #666 / 0.010% |
| 1986 | 194 / #643 / 0.011% |
| 1985 | 174 / #673 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 175 / #654 / 0.010% |
| 1983 | 180 / #638 / 0.010% |
| 1982 | 225 / #573 / 0.012% |
| 1981 | 251 / #530 / 0.014% |
| 1980 | 269 / #522 / 0.015% |
| 1979 | 320 / #454 / 0.019% |
| 1978 | 271 / #490 / 0.017% |
| 1977 | 271 / #494 / 0.016% |
| 1976 | 198 / #578 / 0.013% |
| 1975 | 209 / #560 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 223 / #536 / 0.014% |
| 1973 | 221 / #528 / 0.014% |
| 1972 | 245 / #503 / 0.015% |
| 1971 | 285 / #479 / 0.016% |
| 1970 | 298 / #469 / 0.016% |
| 1969 | 332 / #435 / 0.019% |
| 1968 | 350 / #412 / 0.020% |
| 1967 | 369 / #398 / 0.021% |
| 1966 | 394 / #385 / 0.022% |
| 1965 | 432 / #372 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 485 / #356 / 0.024% |
| 1963 | 473 / #358 / 0.023% |
| 1962 | 469 / #372 / 0.023% |
| 1961 | 523 / #346 / 0.025% |
| 1960 | 508 / #345 / 0.024% |
| 1959 | 532 / #336 / 0.025% |
| 1958 | 573 / #321 / 0.027% |
| 1957 | 662 / #287 / 0.031% |
| 1956 | 591 / #306 / 0.028% |
| 1955 | 604 / #295 / 0.029% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 607 / #288 / 0.030% |
| 1953 | 621 / #281 / 0.031% |
| 1952 | 659 / #267 / 0.034% |
| 1951 | 625 / #270 / 0.033% |
| 1950 | 553 / #287 / 0.031% |
| 1949 | 586 / #280 / 0.033% |
| 1948 | 576 / #280 / 0.033% |
| 1947 | 633 / #268 / 0.035% |
| 1946 | 637 / #243 / 0.039% |
| 1945 | 478 / #274 / 0.036% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 555 / #243 / 0.041% |
| 1943 | 666 / #219 / 0.047% |
| 1942 | 602 / #231 / 0.044% |
| 1941 | 576 / #224 / 0.047% |
| 1940 | 498 / #242 / 0.043% |
| 1939 | 467 / #246 / 0.042% |
| 1938 | 513 / #234 / 0.046% |
| 1937 | 523 / #226 / 0.049% |
| 1936 | 554 / #212 / 0.053% |
| 1935 | 564 / #212 / 0.054% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 600 / #206 / 0.058% |
| 1933 | 567 / #207 / 0.057% |
| 1932 | 691 / #190 / 0.066% |
| 1931 | 708 / #184 / 0.068% |
| 1930 | 808 / #177 / 0.074% |
| 1929 | 829 / #171 / 0.077% |
| 1928 | 911 / #163 / 0.082% |
| 1927 | 929 / #160 / 0.082% |
| 1926 | 1,012 / #156 / 0.091% |
| 1925 | 1,042 / #152 / 0.093% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 1,115 / #148 / 0.098% |
| 1923 | 1,145 / #143 / 0.104% |
| 1922 | 1,014 / #153 / 0.093% |
| 1921 | 1,104 / #142 / 0.100% |
| 1920 | 1,104 / #138 / 0.104% |
| 1919 | 1,007 / #144 / 0.103% |
| 1918 | 1,099 / #140 / 0.108% |
| 1917 | 1,045 / #135 / 0.113% |
| 1916 | 1,032 / #134 / 0.116% |
| 1915 | 961 / #136 / 0.113% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 792 / #130 / 0.121% |
| 1913 | 599 / #131 / 0.117% |
| 1912 | 452 / #143 / 0.105% |
| 1911 | 235 / #142 / 0.104% |
| 1910 | 200 / #154 / 0.103% |
| 1909 | 147 / #167 / 0.090% |
| 1908 | 141 / #164 / 0.091% |
| 1907 | 129 / #167 / 0.088% |
| 1906 | 122 / #162 / 0.092% |
| 1905 | 108 / #176 / 0.082% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 109 / #168 / 0.085% |
| 1903 | 102 / #166 / 0.086% |
| 1902 | 104 / #167 / 0.085% |
| 1901 | 95 / #161 / 0.089% |
| 1900 | 94 / #202 / 0.062% |
| 1899 | 87 / #168 / 0.082% |
| 1898 | 101 / #163 / 0.082% |
| 1897 | 96 / #163 / 0.085% |
| 1896 | 110 / #151 / 0.092% |
| 1895 | 90 / #176 / 0.077% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 96 / #160 / 0.083% |
| 1893 | 80 / #183 / 0.071% |
| 1892 | 93 / #170 / 0.076% |
| 1891 | 61 / #202 / 0.060% |
| 1890 | 54 / #225 / 0.049% |
| 1889 | 89 / #155 / 0.080% |
| 1888 | 76 / #197 / 0.063% |
| 1887 | 61 / #197 / 0.060% |
| 1886 | 80 / #173 / 0.072% |
| 1885 | 68 / #193 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 72 / #191 / 0.063% |
| 1883 | 63 / #187 / 0.060% |
| 1882 | 71 / #186 / 0.062% |
| 1881 | 61 / #187 / 0.061% |
| 1880 | 67 / #187 / 0.061% |