Total babies named Elijah (all years): 370,593
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 11,171 / #8 / 0.651% |
| 2023 | 11,503 / #5 / 0.673% |
| 2022 | 12,075 / #5 / 0.692% |
| 2021 | 12,825 / #4 / 0.734% |
| 2020 | 13,224 / #4 / 0.767% |
| 2019 | 13,428 / #5 / 0.749% |
| 2018 | 13,012 / #7 / 0.717% |
| 2017 | 13,444 / #8 / 0.727% |
| 2016 | 13,970 / #9 / 0.736% |
| 2015 | 13,707 / #11 / 0.715% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 13,881 / #11 / 0.723% |
| 2013 | 13,826 / #11 / 0.731% |
| 2012 | 13,909 / #13 / 0.733% |
| 2011 | 13,997 / #13 / 0.737% |
| 2010 | 13,919 / #18 / 0.726% |
| 2009 | 12,845 / #21 / 0.648% |
| 2008 | 13,239 / #22 / 0.649% |
| 2007 | 12,424 / #30 / 0.599% |
| 2006 | 12,055 / #29 / 0.587% |
| 2005 | 11,612 / #31 / 0.581% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 11,714 / #31 / 0.590% |
| 2003 | 10,665 / #37 / 0.540% |
| 2002 | 10,053 / #41 / 0.518% |
| 2001 | 8,339 / #45 / 0.429% |
| 2000 | 7,472 / #52 / 0.380% |
| 1999 | 6,596 / #60 / 0.344% |
| 1998 | 5,662 / #66 / 0.296% |
| 1997 | 5,089 / #74 / 0.270% |
| 1996 | 4,818 / #81 / 0.254% |
| 1995 | 3,976 / #93 / 0.209% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 2,621 / #133 / 0.136% |
| 1993 | 1,882 / #170 / 0.096% |
| 1992 | 1,523 / #203 / 0.076% |
| 1991 | 1,345 / #222 / 0.067% |
| 1990 | 1,139 / #243 / 0.055% |
| 1989 | 991 / #257 / 0.050% |
| 1988 | 886 / #266 / 0.046% |
| 1987 | 746 / #289 / 0.040% |
| 1986 | 718 / #290 / 0.039% |
| 1985 | 681 / #299 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 631 / #310 / 0.035% |
| 1983 | 671 / #296 / 0.037% |
| 1982 | 739 / #280 / 0.041% |
| 1981 | 750 / #277 / 0.042% |
| 1980 | 754 / #279 / 0.042% |
| 1979 | 696 / #290 / 0.040% |
| 1978 | 548 / #320 / 0.033% |
| 1977 | 504 / #350 / 0.031% |
| 1976 | 302 / #450 / 0.019% |
| 1975 | 263 / #491 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 288 / #472 / 0.018% |
| 1973 | 212 / #537 / 0.014% |
| 1972 | 209 / #552 / 0.013% |
| 1971 | 196 / #589 / 0.011% |
| 1970 | 184 / #597 / 0.010% |
| 1969 | 143 / #660 / 0.008% |
| 1968 | 122 / #680 / 0.007% |
| 1967 | 134 / #646 / 0.008% |
| 1966 | 140 / #626 / 0.008% |
| 1965 | 122 / #672 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 161 / #618 / 0.008% |
| 1963 | 149 / #642 / 0.007% |
| 1962 | 179 / #583 / 0.009% |
| 1961 | 194 / #564 / 0.009% |
| 1960 | 180 / #580 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 185 / #575 / 0.009% |
| 1958 | 209 / #532 / 0.010% |
| 1957 | 218 / #522 / 0.010% |
| 1956 | 197 / #533 / 0.009% |
| 1955 | 235 / #478 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 254 / #453 / 0.012% |
| 1953 | 248 / #455 / 0.013% |
| 1952 | 263 / #431 / 0.014% |
| 1951 | 223 / #453 / 0.012% |
| 1950 | 282 / #403 / 0.016% |
| 1949 | 267 / #415 / 0.015% |
| 1948 | 244 / #427 / 0.014% |
| 1947 | 296 / #399 / 0.016% |
| 1946 | 222 / #426 / 0.014% |
| 1945 | 237 / #388 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 227 / #399 / 0.017% |
| 1943 | 221 / #416 / 0.015% |
| 1942 | 245 / #387 / 0.018% |
| 1941 | 239 / #375 / 0.019% |
| 1940 | 201 / #405 / 0.017% |
| 1939 | 237 / #371 / 0.021% |
| 1938 | 195 / #407 / 0.018% |
| 1937 | 210 / #382 / 0.020% |
| 1936 | 221 / #365 / 0.021% |
| 1935 | 210 / #374 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 209 / #379 / 0.020% |
| 1933 | 198 / #386 / 0.020% |
| 1932 | 231 / #365 / 0.022% |
| 1931 | 198 / #400 / 0.019% |
| 1930 | 226 / #378 / 0.021% |
| 1929 | 243 / #368 / 0.023% |
| 1928 | 255 / #365 / 0.023% |
| 1927 | 290 / #336 / 0.026% |
| 1926 | 276 / #348 / 0.025% |
| 1925 | 283 / #348 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 261 / #375 / 0.023% |
| 1923 | 302 / #335 / 0.028% |
| 1922 | 311 / #327 / 0.029% |
| 1921 | 257 / #378 / 0.023% |
| 1920 | 277 / #356 / 0.026% |
| 1919 | 295 / #327 / 0.030% |
| 1918 | 264 / #358 / 0.026% |
| 1917 | 256 / #348 / 0.028% |
| 1916 | 232 / #353 / 0.026% |
| 1915 | 243 / #340 / 0.029% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 187 / #340 / 0.029% |
| 1913 | 149 / #335 / 0.029% |
| 1912 | 142 / #303 / 0.033% |
| 1911 | 94 / #269 / 0.042% |
| 1910 | 101 / #234 / 0.052% |
| 1909 | 90 / #231 / 0.055% |
| 1908 | 64 / #266 / 0.041% |
| 1907 | 76 / #234 / 0.052% |
| 1906 | 65 / #243 / 0.049% |
| 1905 | 81 / #212 / 0.061% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 60 / #243 / 0.047% |
| 1903 | 58 / #240 / 0.049% |
| 1902 | 66 / #221 / 0.054% |
| 1901 | 79 / #184 / 0.074% |
| 1900 | 86 / #211 / 0.057% |
| 1899 | 64 / #205 / 0.060% |
| 1898 | 76 / #197 / 0.062% |
| 1897 | 65 / #209 / 0.058% |
| 1896 | 87 / #186 / 0.073% |
| 1895 | 75 / #194 / 0.064% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 54 / #235 / 0.047% |
| 1893 | 77 / #189 / 0.069% |
| 1892 | 85 / #184 / 0.070% |
| 1891 | 57 / #210 / 0.056% |
| 1890 | 64 / #204 / 0.058% |
| 1889 | 61 / #209 / 0.055% |
| 1888 | 88 / #171 / 0.073% |
| 1887 | 75 / #169 / 0.074% |
| 1886 | 93 / #152 / 0.084% |
| 1885 | 82 / #163 / 0.076% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 85 / #164 / 0.074% |
| 1883 | 92 / #135 / 0.088% |
| 1882 | 111 / #126 / 0.098% |
| 1881 | 69 / #172 / 0.069% |
| 1880 | 100 / #135 / 0.091% |