Total babies named Elinor (all years): 21,496
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 144 / #1502 / 0.009% |
| 2023 | 164 / #1374 / 0.010% |
| 2022 | 175 / #1343 / 0.011% |
| 2021 | 172 / #1312 / 0.010% |
| 2020 | 144 / #1487 / 0.009% |
| 2019 | 162 / #1386 / 0.010% |
| 2018 | 159 / #1406 / 0.009% |
| 2017 | 165 / #1391 / 0.010% |
| 2016 | 171 / #1374 / 0.010% |
| 2015 | 165 / #1410 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 144 / #1520 / 0.008% |
| 2013 | 120 / #1728 / 0.007% |
| 2012 | 134 / #1614 / 0.008% |
| 2011 | 99 / #1987 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 105 / #1913 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 96 / #2107 / 0.005% |
| 2008 | 102 / #2036 / 0.005% |
| 2007 | 83 / #2316 / 0.004% |
| 2006 | 75 / #2466 / 0.004% |
| 2005 | 65 / #2608 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 71 / #2403 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 64 / #2532 / 0.004% |
| 2002 | 71 / #2293 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 57 / #2643 / 0.003% |
| 2000 | 49 / #2914 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 66 / #2263 / 0.004% |
| 1998 | 54 / #2541 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 48 / #2628 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 44 / #2767 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 54 / #2398 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 27 / #3923 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 32 / #3446 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 27 / #3898 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 31 / #3466 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 22 / #4416 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 32 / #3272 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 24 / #3826 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 24 / #3650 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 26 / #3379 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 17 / #4508 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 28 / #3101 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 14 / #4946 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 18 / #4216 / 0.001% |
| 1981 | 28 / #3088 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 21 / #3751 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 24 / #3371 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 28 / #2889 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 21 / #3516 / 0.001% |
| 1976 | 11 / #5317 / 0.001% |
| 1975 | 18 / #3672 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 23 / #3033 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 9 / #5700 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 30 / #2412 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 27 / #2684 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 26 / #2725 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 32 / #2267 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 26 / #2447 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 26 / #2391 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 31 / #2109 / 0.002% |
| 1965 | 40 / #1810 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 41 / #1843 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 48 / #1655 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 48 / #1634 / 0.002% |
| 1961 | 57 / #1484 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 68 / #1340 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 53 / #1481 / 0.003% |
| 1958 | 55 / #1439 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 65 / #1316 / 0.003% |
| 1956 | 80 / #1163 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 90 / #1064 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 76 / #1135 / 0.004% |
| 1953 | 100 / #946 / 0.005% |
| 1952 | 121 / #832 / 0.007% |
| 1951 | 110 / #856 / 0.006% |
| 1950 | 87 / #973 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 125 / #772 / 0.007% |
| 1948 | 129 / #748 / 0.008% |
| 1947 | 131 / #749 / 0.007% |
| 1946 | 155 / #633 / 0.010% |
| 1945 | 121 / #676 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 162 / #576 / 0.012% |
| 1943 | 204 / #524 / 0.015% |
| 1942 | 262 / #458 / 0.019% |
| 1941 | 255 / #430 / 0.021% |
| 1940 | 285 / #407 / 0.025% |
| 1939 | 267 / #413 / 0.024% |
| 1938 | 301 / #385 / 0.027% |
| 1937 | 298 / #373 / 0.028% |
| 1936 | 340 / #339 / 0.033% |
| 1935 | 354 / #336 / 0.034% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 409 / #310 / 0.039% |
| 1933 | 441 / #288 / 0.044% |
| 1932 | 377 / #327 / 0.035% |
| 1931 | 466 / #288 / 0.044% |
| 1930 | 509 / #296 / 0.045% |
| 1929 | 527 / #281 / 0.047% |
| 1928 | 523 / #287 / 0.045% |
| 1927 | 604 / #269 / 0.051% |
| 1926 | 607 / #271 / 0.051% |
| 1925 | 542 / #287 / 0.045% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 595 / #268 / 0.048% |
| 1923 | 556 / #273 / 0.046% |
| 1922 | 539 / #277 / 0.045% |
| 1921 | 612 / #269 / 0.050% |
| 1920 | 656 / #257 / 0.055% |
| 1919 | 589 / #263 / 0.052% |
| 1918 | 571 / #265 / 0.049% |
| 1917 | 548 / #265 / 0.051% |
| 1916 | 580 / #252 / 0.056% |
| 1915 | 508 / #259 / 0.052% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 358 / #275 / 0.047% |
| 1913 | 279 / #281 / 0.045% |
| 1912 | 268 / #275 / 0.048% |
| 1911 | 176 / #295 / 0.042% |
| 1910 | 133 / #344 / 0.034% |
| 1909 | 116 / #336 / 0.033% |
| 1908 | 91 / #378 / 0.027% |
| 1907 | 100 / #355 / 0.031% |
| 1906 | 69 / #411 / 0.023% |
| 1905 | 61 / #430 / 0.021% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 52 / #453 / 0.019% |
| 1903 | 40 / #505 / 0.015% |
| 1902 | 34 / #562 / 0.013% |
| 1901 | 41 / #469 / 0.017% |
| 1900 | 52 / #470 / 0.017% |
| 1899 | 27 / #597 / 0.012% |
| 1898 | 39 / #494 / 0.015% |
| 1897 | 34 / #500 / 0.015% |
| 1896 | 34 / #507 / 0.014% |
| 1895 | 24 / #628 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 27 / #562 / 0.012% |
| 1893 | 34 / #457 / 0.016% |
| 1892 | 15 / #771 / 0.007% |
| 1891 | 20 / #595 / 0.011% |
| 1890 | 23 / #552 / 0.012% |
| 1889 | 24 / #519 / 0.013% |
| 1888 | 21 / #554 / 0.012% |
| 1887 | 11 / #704 / 0.008% |
| 1886 | 16 / #559 / 0.011% |
| 1885 | 18 / #508 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 13 / #593 / 0.010% |
| 1883 | 7 / #770 / 0.006% |
| 1882 | 10 / #609 / 0.009% |
| 1881 | 8 / #642 / 0.009% |
| 1880 | 9 / #596 / 0.010% |