Total babies named Elisha (all years): 29,647
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 284 / #847 / 0.017% |
| 2023 | 281 / #857 / 0.016% |
| 2022 | 302 / #821 / 0.017% |
| 2021 | 266 / #869 / 0.015% |
| 2020 | 271 / #843 / 0.016% |
| 2019 | 319 / #749 / 0.018% |
| 2018 | 270 / #829 / 0.015% |
| 2017 | 286 / #799 / 0.015% |
| 2016 | 304 / #783 / 0.016% |
| 2015 | 305 / #776 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 327 / #733 / 0.017% |
| 2013 | 348 / #689 / 0.018% |
| 2012 | 317 / #733 / 0.017% |
| 2011 | 311 / #731 / 0.016% |
| 2010 | 363 / #661 / 0.019% |
| 2009 | 342 / #703 / 0.017% |
| 2008 | 392 / #630 / 0.019% |
| 2007 | 365 / #656 / 0.018% |
| 2006 | 376 / #627 / 0.018% |
| 2005 | 377 / #600 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 359 / #599 / 0.018% |
| 2003 | 337 / #616 / 0.017% |
| 2002 | 336 / #602 / 0.017% |
| 2001 | 300 / #632 / 0.015% |
| 2000 | 277 / #653 / 0.014% |
| 1999 | 284 / #631 / 0.015% |
| 1998 | 254 / #671 / 0.013% |
| 1997 | 234 / #688 / 0.012% |
| 1996 | 230 / #698 / 0.012% |
| 1995 | 204 / #751 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 178 / #795 / 0.009% |
| 1993 | 142 / #902 / 0.007% |
| 1992 | 137 / #904 / 0.007% |
| 1991 | 139 / #895 / 0.007% |
| 1990 | 118 / #960 / 0.006% |
| 1989 | 103 / #1010 / 0.005% |
| 1988 | 90 / #1041 / 0.005% |
| 1987 | 88 / #1011 / 0.005% |
| 1986 | 80 / #1045 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 101 / #901 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 115 / #815 / 0.006% |
| 1983 | 94 / #911 / 0.005% |
| 1982 | 108 / #857 / 0.006% |
| 1981 | 103 / #875 / 0.006% |
| 1980 | 112 / #833 / 0.006% |
| 1979 | 93 / #909 / 0.005% |
| 1978 | 87 / #929 / 0.005% |
| 1977 | 82 / #944 / 0.005% |
| 1976 | 64 / #1043 / 0.004% |
| 1975 | 69 / #986 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 48 / #1203 / 0.003% |
| 1973 | 37 / #1381 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 45 / #1236 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 37 / #1405 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 39 / #1339 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 25 / #1656 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 22 / #1705 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 14 / #2175 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 24 / #1596 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 30 / #1414 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 31 / #1415 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 30 / #1435 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 34 / #1349 / 0.002% |
| 1961 | 23 / #1700 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 29 / #1494 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 34 / #1343 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 32 / #1381 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 36 / #1304 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 36 / #1288 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 44 / #1118 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 44 / #1125 / 0.002% |
| 1953 | 40 / #1174 / 0.002% |
| 1952 | 41 / #1159 / 0.002% |
| 1951 | 45 / #1074 / 0.002% |
| 1950 | 49 / #993 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 52 / #959 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 43 / #1086 / 0.002% |
| 1947 | 46 / #1068 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 45 / #1022 / 0.003% |
| 1945 | 46 / #956 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 45 / #966 / 0.003% |
| 1943 | 48 / #973 / 0.003% |
| 1942 | 44 / #1013 / 0.003% |
| 1941 | 47 / #928 / 0.004% |
| 1940 | 56 / #842 / 0.005% |
| 1939 | 47 / #905 / 0.004% |
| 1938 | 41 / #993 / 0.004% |
| 1937 | 48 / #899 / 0.005% |
| 1936 | 48 / #885 / 0.005% |
| 1935 | 53 / #862 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 60 / #799 / 0.006% |
| 1933 | 45 / #939 / 0.005% |
| 1932 | 62 / #812 / 0.006% |
| 1931 | 63 / #790 / 0.006% |
| 1930 | 71 / #755 / 0.006% |
| 1929 | 60 / #847 / 0.006% |
| 1928 | 68 / #789 / 0.006% |
| 1927 | 79 / #737 / 0.007% |
| 1926 | 72 / #760 / 0.006% |
| 1925 | 74 / #769 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 72 / #794 / 0.006% |
| 1923 | 89 / #682 / 0.008% |
| 1922 | 96 / #655 / 0.009% |
| 1921 | 99 / #648 / 0.009% |
| 1920 | 71 / #795 / 0.007% |
| 1919 | 79 / #707 / 0.008% |
| 1918 | 69 / #784 / 0.007% |
| 1917 | 79 / #676 / 0.009% |
| 1916 | 81 / #652 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 58 / #795 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 42 / #826 / 0.006% |
| 1913 | 45 / #671 / 0.009% |
| 1912 | 44 / #628 / 0.010% |
| 1911 | 27 / #588 / 0.012% |
| 1910 | 25 / #571 / 0.013% |
| 1909 | 24 / #534 / 0.015% |
| 1908 | 11 / #843 / 0.007% |
| 1907 | 21 / #519 / 0.014% |
| 1906 | 15 / #623 / 0.011% |
| 1905 | 16 / #599 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 25 / #420 / 0.020% |
| 1903 | 25 / #395 / 0.021% |
| 1902 | 23 / #427 / 0.019% |
| 1901 | 19 / #437 / 0.018% |
| 1900 | 37 / #362 / 0.025% |
| 1899 | 26 / #356 / 0.024% |
| 1898 | 32 / #340 / 0.026% |
| 1897 | 18 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1896 | 23 / #408 / 0.019% |
| 1895 | 33 / #321 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 27 / #351 / 0.023% |
| 1893 | 17 / #452 / 0.015% |
| 1892 | 28 / #360 / 0.023% |
| 1891 | 28 / #318 / 0.028% |
| 1890 | 24 / #359 / 0.022% |
| 1889 | 29 / #325 / 0.026% |
| 1888 | 37 / #290 / 0.031% |
| 1887 | 20 / #368 / 0.020% |
| 1886 | 35 / #291 / 0.032% |
| 1885 | 38 / #268 / 0.035% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 39 / #272 / 0.034% |
| 1883 | 42 / #255 / 0.040% |
| 1882 | 35 / #290 / 0.031% |
| 1881 | 29 / #297 / 0.029% |
| 1880 | 32 / #293 / 0.029% |