Total babies named Elliott (all years): 67,925
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,219 / #163 / 0.129% |
| 2023 | 2,162 / #168 / 0.127% |
| 2022 | 2,230 / #168 / 0.128% |
| 2021 | 2,277 / #169 / 0.130% |
| 2020 | 2,364 / #158 / 0.137% |
| 2019 | 2,451 / #161 / 0.137% |
| 2018 | 2,308 / #168 / 0.127% |
| 2017 | 2,438 / #160 / 0.132% |
| 2016 | 2,094 / #192 / 0.110% |
| 2015 | 1,875 / #212 / 0.098% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,595 / #233 / 0.083% |
| 2013 | 1,480 / #244 / 0.078% |
| 2012 | 1,265 / #277 / 0.067% |
| 2011 | 1,068 / #305 / 0.056% |
| 2010 | 1,014 / #315 / 0.053% |
| 2009 | 895 / #349 / 0.045% |
| 2008 | 795 / #385 / 0.039% |
| 2007 | 793 / #383 / 0.038% |
| 2006 | 773 / #387 / 0.038% |
| 2005 | 658 / #413 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 566 / #458 / 0.029% |
| 2003 | 477 / #511 / 0.024% |
| 2002 | 417 / #537 / 0.021% |
| 2001 | 391 / #548 / 0.020% |
| 2000 | 405 / #539 / 0.021% |
| 1999 | 382 / #538 / 0.020% |
| 1998 | 430 / #500 / 0.023% |
| 1997 | 404 / #508 / 0.021% |
| 1996 | 417 / #501 / 0.022% |
| 1995 | 433 / #495 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 478 / #461 / 0.025% |
| 1993 | 585 / #397 / 0.030% |
| 1992 | 576 / #399 / 0.029% |
| 1991 | 571 / #398 / 0.028% |
| 1990 | 672 / #358 / 0.033% |
| 1989 | 669 / #343 / 0.033% |
| 1988 | 531 / #377 / 0.028% |
| 1987 | 444 / #414 / 0.024% |
| 1986 | 453 / #398 / 0.025% |
| 1985 | 461 / #389 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 529 / #349 / 0.029% |
| 1983 | 583 / #325 / 0.033% |
| 1982 | 468 / #372 / 0.026% |
| 1981 | 293 / #487 / 0.016% |
| 1980 | 333 / #462 / 0.019% |
| 1979 | 296 / #480 / 0.017% |
| 1978 | 233 / #542 / 0.014% |
| 1977 | 270 / #496 / 0.016% |
| 1976 | 227 / #536 / 0.014% |
| 1975 | 214 / #550 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 217 / #544 / 0.014% |
| 1973 | 232 / #513 / 0.015% |
| 1972 | 200 / #567 / 0.012% |
| 1971 | 262 / #503 / 0.015% |
| 1970 | 236 / #526 / 0.013% |
| 1969 | 232 / #511 / 0.013% |
| 1968 | 213 / #520 / 0.012% |
| 1967 | 197 / #529 / 0.011% |
| 1966 | 229 / #500 / 0.013% |
| 1965 | 255 / #484 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 215 / #534 / 0.011% |
| 1963 | 255 / #503 / 0.013% |
| 1962 | 260 / #492 / 0.013% |
| 1961 | 311 / #457 / 0.015% |
| 1960 | 275 / #477 / 0.013% |
| 1959 | 235 / #512 / 0.011% |
| 1958 | 202 / #542 / 0.010% |
| 1957 | 218 / #523 / 0.010% |
| 1956 | 251 / #479 / 0.012% |
| 1955 | 222 / #495 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 258 / #450 / 0.013% |
| 1953 | 250 / #452 / 0.013% |
| 1952 | 237 / #459 / 0.012% |
| 1951 | 259 / #423 / 0.014% |
| 1950 | 250 / #425 / 0.014% |
| 1949 | 292 / #392 / 0.016% |
| 1948 | 343 / #366 / 0.020% |
| 1947 | 349 / #370 / 0.019% |
| 1946 | 272 / #394 / 0.017% |
| 1945 | 310 / #340 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 215 / #410 / 0.016% |
| 1943 | 235 / #402 / 0.016% |
| 1942 | 252 / #384 / 0.018% |
| 1941 | 193 / #421 / 0.016% |
| 1940 | 197 / #411 / 0.017% |
| 1939 | 197 / #408 / 0.018% |
| 1938 | 175 / #433 / 0.016% |
| 1937 | 154 / #453 / 0.014% |
| 1936 | 154 / #454 / 0.015% |
| 1935 | 191 / #396 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 200 / #387 / 0.019% |
| 1933 | 196 / #389 / 0.020% |
| 1932 | 148 / #473 / 0.014% |
| 1931 | 148 / #464 / 0.014% |
| 1930 | 177 / #443 / 0.016% |
| 1929 | 177 / #447 / 0.016% |
| 1928 | 169 / #469 / 0.015% |
| 1927 | 206 / #421 / 0.018% |
| 1926 | 209 / #419 / 0.019% |
| 1925 | 189 / #437 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 194 / #439 / 0.017% |
| 1923 | 185 / #450 / 0.017% |
| 1922 | 205 / #418 / 0.019% |
| 1921 | 233 / #399 / 0.021% |
| 1920 | 180 / #453 / 0.017% |
| 1919 | 171 / #448 / 0.017% |
| 1918 | 151 / #485 / 0.015% |
| 1917 | 152 / #461 / 0.016% |
| 1916 | 158 / #443 / 0.018% |
| 1915 | 172 / #411 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 129 / #423 / 0.020% |
| 1913 | 111 / #411 / 0.022% |
| 1912 | 85 / #425 / 0.020% |
| 1911 | 56 / #374 / 0.025% |
| 1910 | 44 / #397 / 0.023% |
| 1909 | 46 / #345 / 0.028% |
| 1908 | 46 / #332 / 0.030% |
| 1907 | 22 / #497 / 0.015% |
| 1906 | 25 / #444 / 0.019% |
| 1905 | 32 / #365 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 27 / #402 / 0.021% |
| 1903 | 28 / #362 / 0.023% |
| 1902 | 29 / #370 / 0.024% |
| 1901 | 17 / #476 / 0.016% |
| 1900 | 33 / #386 / 0.022% |
| 1899 | 18 / #442 / 0.017% |
| 1898 | 32 / #341 / 0.026% |
| 1897 | 23 / #395 / 0.020% |
| 1896 | 25 / #389 / 0.021% |
| 1895 | 31 / #332 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 21 / #412 / 0.018% |
| 1893 | 17 / #453 / 0.015% |
| 1892 | 29 / #349 / 0.024% |
| 1891 | 21 / #378 / 0.021% |
| 1890 | 24 / #360 / 0.022% |
| 1889 | 11 / #597 / 0.010% |
| 1888 | 26 / #362 / 0.022% |
| 1887 | 13 / #497 / 0.013% |
| 1886 | 22 / #371 / 0.020% |
| 1885 | 13 / #525 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 22 / #377 / 0.019% |
| 1883 | 26 / #325 / 0.025% |
| 1882 | 21 / #392 / 0.018% |
| 1881 | 22 / #351 / 0.022% |
| 1880 | 21 / #375 / 0.019% |