Total babies named Ellis (all years): 55,901
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,250 / #273 / 0.073% |
| 2023 | 1,230 / #274 / 0.072% |
| 2022 | 1,094 / #307 / 0.063% |
| 2021 | 1,037 / #320 / 0.059% |
| 2020 | 1,010 / #326 / 0.059% |
| 2019 | 976 / #342 / 0.054% |
| 2018 | 1,063 / #318 / 0.059% |
| 2017 | 1,109 / #311 / 0.060% |
| 2016 | 999 / #347 / 0.053% |
| 2015 | 740 / #422 / 0.039% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 680 / #443 / 0.035% |
| 2013 | 501 / #531 / 0.026% |
| 2012 | 403 / #611 / 0.021% |
| 2011 | 313 / #726 / 0.016% |
| 2010 | 314 / #729 / 0.016% |
| 2009 | 328 / #721 / 0.017% |
| 2008 | 276 / #795 / 0.014% |
| 2007 | 262 / #813 / 0.013% |
| 2006 | 267 / #777 / 0.013% |
| 2005 | 246 / #790 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 212 / #838 / 0.011% |
| 2003 | 211 / #830 / 0.011% |
| 2002 | 177 / #911 / 0.009% |
| 2001 | 167 / #928 / 0.009% |
| 2000 | 209 / #787 / 0.011% |
| 1999 | 180 / #837 / 0.009% |
| 1998 | 184 / #817 / 0.010% |
| 1997 | 196 / #759 / 0.010% |
| 1996 | 187 / #782 / 0.010% |
| 1995 | 166 / #834 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 160 / #847 / 0.008% |
| 1993 | 167 / #819 / 0.009% |
| 1992 | 186 / #766 / 0.009% |
| 1991 | 189 / #740 / 0.009% |
| 1990 | 181 / #757 / 0.009% |
| 1989 | 172 / #752 / 0.009% |
| 1988 | 146 / #780 / 0.008% |
| 1987 | 162 / #718 / 0.009% |
| 1986 | 161 / #714 / 0.009% |
| 1985 | 148 / #726 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 134 / #749 / 0.007% |
| 1983 | 139 / #732 / 0.008% |
| 1982 | 123 / #799 / 0.007% |
| 1981 | 157 / #689 / 0.009% |
| 1980 | 172 / #661 / 0.010% |
| 1979 | 168 / #660 / 0.010% |
| 1978 | 136 / #722 / 0.008% |
| 1977 | 154 / #683 / 0.009% |
| 1976 | 175 / #619 / 0.011% |
| 1975 | 137 / #709 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 171 / #616 / 0.011% |
| 1973 | 183 / #586 / 0.012% |
| 1972 | 153 / #645 / 0.009% |
| 1971 | 204 / #573 / 0.012% |
| 1970 | 186 / #594 / 0.010% |
| 1969 | 205 / #548 / 0.011% |
| 1968 | 203 / #536 / 0.012% |
| 1967 | 216 / #511 / 0.012% |
| 1966 | 227 / #504 / 0.013% |
| 1965 | 230 / #502 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 286 / #468 / 0.014% |
| 1963 | 267 / #490 / 0.013% |
| 1962 | 276 / #480 / 0.013% |
| 1961 | 328 / #443 / 0.015% |
| 1960 | 358 / #421 / 0.017% |
| 1959 | 317 / #452 / 0.015% |
| 1958 | 356 / #415 / 0.017% |
| 1957 | 387 / #392 / 0.018% |
| 1956 | 419 / #359 / 0.020% |
| 1955 | 371 / #375 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 380 / #365 / 0.019% |
| 1953 | 453 / #331 / 0.023% |
| 1952 | 422 / #338 / 0.022% |
| 1951 | 404 / #340 / 0.021% |
| 1950 | 461 / #319 / 0.026% |
| 1949 | 430 / #330 / 0.024% |
| 1948 | 450 / #316 / 0.026% |
| 1947 | 510 / #306 / 0.028% |
| 1946 | 500 / #289 / 0.031% |
| 1945 | 417 / #292 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 450 / #282 / 0.033% |
| 1943 | 495 / #274 / 0.035% |
| 1942 | 492 / #268 / 0.036% |
| 1941 | 443 / #272 / 0.036% |
| 1940 | 430 / #270 / 0.037% |
| 1939 | 418 / #266 / 0.038% |
| 1938 | 476 / #248 / 0.043% |
| 1937 | 451 / #252 / 0.042% |
| 1936 | 428 / #260 / 0.041% |
| 1935 | 438 / #257 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 430 / #261 / 0.042% |
| 1933 | 426 / #254 / 0.043% |
| 1932 | 436 / #260 / 0.042% |
| 1931 | 456 / #251 / 0.044% |
| 1930 | 523 / #242 / 0.048% |
| 1929 | 545 / #232 / 0.051% |
| 1928 | 544 / #238 / 0.049% |
| 1927 | 579 / #229 / 0.051% |
| 1926 | 607 / #224 / 0.055% |
| 1925 | 613 / #220 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 627 / #216 / 0.055% |
| 1923 | 657 / #204 / 0.060% |
| 1922 | 625 / #210 / 0.057% |
| 1921 | 682 / #203 / 0.062% |
| 1920 | 646 / #204 / 0.061% |
| 1919 | 634 / #198 / 0.065% |
| 1918 | 624 / #206 / 0.062% |
| 1917 | 574 / #201 / 0.062% |
| 1916 | 570 / #200 / 0.064% |
| 1915 | 618 / #182 / 0.073% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 426 / #195 / 0.065% |
| 1913 | 391 / #174 / 0.076% |
| 1912 | 282 / #202 / 0.066% |
| 1911 | 167 / #185 / 0.074% |
| 1910 | 147 / #185 / 0.076% |
| 1909 | 131 / #178 / 0.080% |
| 1908 | 123 / #177 / 0.080% |
| 1907 | 120 / #182 / 0.082% |
| 1906 | 101 / #177 / 0.076% |
| 1905 | 103 / #181 / 0.078% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 106 / #173 / 0.083% |
| 1903 | 110 / #160 / 0.092% |
| 1902 | 112 / #158 / 0.091% |
| 1901 | 74 / #195 / 0.070% |
| 1900 | 120 / #173 / 0.080% |
| 1899 | 98 / #155 / 0.092% |
| 1898 | 96 / #170 / 0.078% |
| 1897 | 98 / #157 / 0.087% |
| 1896 | 106 / #156 / 0.089% |
| 1895 | 100 / #156 / 0.085% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 83 / #182 / 0.072% |
| 1893 | 79 / #185 / 0.070% |
| 1892 | 89 / #177 / 0.073% |
| 1891 | 66 / #189 / 0.065% |
| 1890 | 71 / #190 / 0.064% |
| 1889 | 80 / #168 / 0.072% |
| 1888 | 71 / #206 / 0.059% |
| 1887 | 66 / #188 / 0.065% |
| 1886 | 85 / #163 / 0.077% |
| 1885 | 78 / #169 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 73 / #188 / 0.064% |
| 1883 | 73 / #168 / 0.070% |
| 1882 | 86 / #159 / 0.076% |
| 1881 | 58 / #194 / 0.058% |
| 1880 | 58 / #210 / 0.052% |