Total babies named Elmer (all years): 131,169
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 178 / #1166 / 0.010% |
| 2023 | 140 / #1351 / 0.008% |
| 2022 | 168 / #1192 / 0.010% |
| 2021 | 160 / #1209 / 0.009% |
| 2020 | 138 / #1310 / 0.008% |
| 2019 | 175 / #1120 / 0.010% |
| 2018 | 145 / #1266 / 0.008% |
| 2017 | 151 / #1217 / 0.008% |
| 2016 | 168 / #1145 / 0.009% |
| 2015 | 153 / #1206 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 169 / #1130 / 0.009% |
| 2013 | 158 / #1147 / 0.008% |
| 2012 | 143 / #1237 / 0.008% |
| 2011 | 181 / #1047 / 0.010% |
| 2010 | 195 / #1007 / 0.010% |
| 2009 | 226 / #914 / 0.011% |
| 2008 | 182 / #1041 / 0.009% |
| 2007 | 243 / #857 / 0.012% |
| 2006 | 221 / #890 / 0.011% |
| 2005 | 226 / #827 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 212 / #839 / 0.011% |
| 2003 | 307 / #650 / 0.016% |
| 2002 | 227 / #760 / 0.012% |
| 2001 | 237 / #735 / 0.012% |
| 2000 | 188 / #850 / 0.010% |
| 1999 | 178 / #852 / 0.009% |
| 1998 | 215 / #749 / 0.011% |
| 1997 | 222 / #712 / 0.012% |
| 1996 | 225 / #704 / 0.012% |
| 1995 | 212 / #738 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 186 / #773 / 0.010% |
| 1993 | 205 / #725 / 0.010% |
| 1992 | 236 / #675 / 0.012% |
| 1991 | 210 / #699 / 0.010% |
| 1990 | 215 / #691 / 0.010% |
| 1989 | 167 / #769 / 0.008% |
| 1988 | 168 / #728 / 0.009% |
| 1987 | 160 / #724 / 0.009% |
| 1986 | 149 / #744 / 0.008% |
| 1985 | 140 / #754 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 163 / #677 / 0.009% |
| 1983 | 150 / #699 / 0.008% |
| 1982 | 151 / #708 / 0.008% |
| 1981 | 157 / #690 / 0.009% |
| 1980 | 162 / #681 / 0.009% |
| 1979 | 191 / #621 / 0.011% |
| 1978 | 166 / #652 / 0.010% |
| 1977 | 176 / #641 / 0.011% |
| 1976 | 184 / #598 / 0.012% |
| 1975 | 187 / #590 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 222 / #538 / 0.014% |
| 1973 | 209 / #539 / 0.013% |
| 1972 | 245 / #504 / 0.015% |
| 1971 | 271 / #486 / 0.015% |
| 1970 | 286 / #476 / 0.015% |
| 1969 | 300 / #450 / 0.017% |
| 1968 | 307 / #435 / 0.018% |
| 1967 | 306 / #434 / 0.018% |
| 1966 | 319 / #427 / 0.018% |
| 1965 | 376 / #405 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 389 / #407 / 0.020% |
| 1963 | 409 / #398 / 0.020% |
| 1962 | 434 / #386 / 0.021% |
| 1961 | 478 / #363 / 0.023% |
| 1960 | 515 / #342 / 0.024% |
| 1959 | 529 / #337 / 0.025% |
| 1958 | 549 / #329 / 0.026% |
| 1957 | 660 / #290 / 0.031% |
| 1956 | 656 / #286 / 0.031% |
| 1955 | 714 / #261 / 0.035% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 673 / #271 / 0.033% |
| 1953 | 688 / #265 / 0.035% |
| 1952 | 761 / #245 / 0.039% |
| 1951 | 842 / #226 / 0.045% |
| 1950 | 809 / #226 / 0.045% |
| 1949 | 867 / #215 / 0.049% |
| 1948 | 970 / #203 / 0.055% |
| 1947 | 997 / #201 / 0.054% |
| 1946 | 1,046 / #178 / 0.064% |
| 1945 | 969 / #169 / 0.072% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,069 / #164 / 0.078% |
| 1943 | 1,311 / #154 / 0.092% |
| 1942 | 1,228 / #158 / 0.089% |
| 1941 | 1,202 / #147 / 0.098% |
| 1940 | 1,220 / #144 / 0.105% |
| 1939 | 1,328 / #132 / 0.120% |
| 1938 | 1,330 / #130 / 0.120% |
| 1937 | 1,413 / #120 / 0.132% |
| 1936 | 1,412 / #121 / 0.136% |
| 1935 | 1,592 / #115 / 0.153% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 1,709 / #108 / 0.166% |
| 1933 | 1,787 / #101 / 0.180% |
| 1932 | 2,058 / #94 / 0.197% |
| 1931 | 2,265 / #82 / 0.218% |
| 1930 | 2,476 / #80 / 0.226% |
| 1929 | 2,697 / #70 / 0.251% |
| 1928 | 2,977 / #64 / 0.269% |
| 1927 | 3,205 / #61 / 0.284% |
| 1926 | 3,233 / #61 / 0.291% |
| 1925 | 3,356 / #61 / 0.301% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 3,731 / #57 / 0.329% |
| 1923 | 3,630 / #57 / 0.331% |
| 1922 | 3,738 / #54 / 0.344% |
| 1921 | 4,146 / #48 / 0.376% |
| 1920 | 4,206 / #45 / 0.395% |
| 1919 | 3,982 / #44 / 0.406% |
| 1918 | 4,373 / #44 / 0.431% |
| 1917 | 3,812 / #45 / 0.412% |
| 1916 | 3,936 / #45 / 0.442% |
| 1915 | 3,802 / #45 / 0.448% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 2,878 / #46 / 0.440% |
| 1913 | 2,323 / #45 / 0.453% |
| 1912 | 1,840 / #47 / 0.428% |
| 1911 | 894 / #48 / 0.396% |
| 1910 | 760 / #48 / 0.391% |
| 1909 | 687 / #45 / 0.419% |
| 1908 | 689 / #42 / 0.446% |
| 1907 | 616 / #45 / 0.420% |
| 1906 | 598 / #42 / 0.449% |
| 1905 | 602 / #41 / 0.455% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 620 / #39 / 0.484% |
| 1903 | 556 / #40 / 0.466% |
| 1902 | 574 / #40 / 0.468% |
| 1901 | 520 / #38 / 0.488% |
| 1900 | 699 / #38 / 0.465% |
| 1899 | 514 / #37 / 0.484% |
| 1898 | 583 / #40 / 0.475% |
| 1897 | 587 / #34 / 0.521% |
| 1896 | 576 / #36 / 0.482% |
| 1895 | 610 / #34 / 0.520% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 575 / #37 / 0.497% |
| 1893 | 574 / #32 / 0.511% |
| 1892 | 592 / #36 / 0.485% |
| 1891 | 508 / #36 / 0.502% |
| 1890 | 528 / #38 / 0.476% |
| 1889 | 557 / #34 / 0.504% |
| 1888 | 527 / #39 / 0.436% |
| 1887 | 467 / #36 / 0.461% |
| 1886 | 485 / #35 / 0.438% |
| 1885 | 443 / #40 / 0.411% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 523 / #35 / 0.457% |
| 1883 | 423 / #40 / 0.404% |
| 1882 | 441 / #38 / 0.388% |
| 1881 | 388 / #38 / 0.385% |
| 1880 | 373 / #41 / 0.338% |