Total babies named Emanuel (all years): 54,321
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 620 / #496 / 0.036% |
| 2023 | 623 / #484 / 0.036% |
| 2022 | 662 / #465 / 0.038% |
| 2021 | 578 / #510 / 0.033% |
| 2020 | 723 / #410 / 0.042% |
| 2019 | 741 / #421 / 0.041% |
| 2018 | 712 / #428 / 0.039% |
| 2017 | 754 / #412 / 0.041% |
| 2016 | 914 / #364 / 0.048% |
| 2015 | 979 / #348 / 0.051% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,025 / #331 / 0.053% |
| 2013 | 1,032 / #322 / 0.055% |
| 2012 | 1,097 / #306 / 0.058% |
| 2011 | 1,325 / #261 / 0.070% |
| 2010 | 1,196 / #281 / 0.062% |
| 2009 | 1,290 / #266 / 0.065% |
| 2008 | 1,350 / #259 / 0.066% |
| 2007 | 1,386 / #256 / 0.067% |
| 2006 | 1,312 / #262 / 0.064% |
| 2005 | 1,231 / #271 / 0.062% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,150 / #277 / 0.058% |
| 2003 | 1,052 / #293 / 0.053% |
| 2002 | 1,021 / #292 / 0.053% |
| 2001 | 881 / #320 / 0.045% |
| 2000 | 863 / #329 / 0.044% |
| 1999 | 832 / #329 / 0.043% |
| 1998 | 726 / #359 / 0.038% |
| 1997 | 659 / #369 / 0.035% |
| 1996 | 701 / #350 / 0.037% |
| 1995 | 631 / #376 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 623 / #375 / 0.032% |
| 1993 | 645 / #366 / 0.033% |
| 1992 | 652 / #362 / 0.033% |
| 1991 | 591 / #383 / 0.029% |
| 1990 | 629 / #370 / 0.031% |
| 1989 | 590 / #381 / 0.029% |
| 1988 | 552 / #364 / 0.029% |
| 1987 | 555 / #350 / 0.030% |
| 1986 | 530 / #357 / 0.029% |
| 1985 | 532 / #349 / 0.029% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 554 / #335 / 0.031% |
| 1983 | 414 / #399 / 0.023% |
| 1982 | 366 / #440 / 0.020% |
| 1981 | 433 / #389 / 0.024% |
| 1980 | 343 / #451 / 0.019% |
| 1979 | 287 / #490 / 0.017% |
| 1978 | 278 / #487 / 0.017% |
| 1977 | 255 / #516 / 0.016% |
| 1976 | 236 / #524 / 0.015% |
| 1975 | 246 / #510 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 208 / #555 / 0.013% |
| 1973 | 205 / #551 / 0.013% |
| 1972 | 218 / #540 / 0.013% |
| 1971 | 222 / #538 / 0.013% |
| 1970 | 235 / #528 / 0.013% |
| 1969 | 203 / #553 / 0.011% |
| 1968 | 220 / #509 / 0.013% |
| 1967 | 204 / #522 / 0.012% |
| 1966 | 214 / #520 / 0.012% |
| 1965 | 207 / #535 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 209 / #546 / 0.010% |
| 1963 | 233 / #522 / 0.011% |
| 1962 | 236 / #514 / 0.011% |
| 1961 | 222 / #533 / 0.010% |
| 1960 | 205 / #548 / 0.010% |
| 1959 | 256 / #489 / 0.012% |
| 1958 | 253 / #491 / 0.012% |
| 1957 | 266 / #478 / 0.012% |
| 1956 | 249 / #480 / 0.012% |
| 1955 | 249 / #468 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 218 / #491 / 0.011% |
| 1953 | 214 / #478 / 0.011% |
| 1952 | 212 / #481 / 0.011% |
| 1951 | 247 / #430 / 0.013% |
| 1950 | 222 / #446 / 0.012% |
| 1949 | 231 / #441 / 0.013% |
| 1948 | 225 / #443 / 0.013% |
| 1947 | 196 / #477 / 0.011% |
| 1946 | 179 / #479 / 0.011% |
| 1945 | 188 / #434 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 174 / #461 / 0.013% |
| 1943 | 192 / #454 / 0.013% |
| 1942 | 185 / #453 / 0.013% |
| 1941 | 175 / #444 / 0.014% |
| 1940 | 186 / #428 / 0.016% |
| 1939 | 192 / #412 / 0.017% |
| 1938 | 177 / #430 / 0.016% |
| 1937 | 197 / #395 / 0.018% |
| 1936 | 201 / #386 / 0.019% |
| 1935 | 212 / #370 / 0.020% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 177 / #420 / 0.017% |
| 1933 | 184 / #398 / 0.019% |
| 1932 | 223 / #375 / 0.021% |
| 1931 | 198 / #401 / 0.019% |
| 1930 | 255 / #360 / 0.023% |
| 1929 | 251 / #355 / 0.023% |
| 1928 | 285 / #334 / 0.026% |
| 1927 | 307 / #325 / 0.027% |
| 1926 | 302 / #333 / 0.027% |
| 1925 | 313 / #322 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 345 / #307 / 0.030% |
| 1923 | 329 / #319 / 0.030% |
| 1922 | 343 / #310 / 0.032% |
| 1921 | 354 / #304 / 0.032% |
| 1920 | 381 / #288 / 0.036% |
| 1919 | 322 / #307 / 0.033% |
| 1918 | 384 / #272 / 0.038% |
| 1917 | 362 / #266 / 0.039% |
| 1916 | 306 / #295 / 0.034% |
| 1915 | 345 / #261 / 0.041% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 252 / #276 / 0.038% |
| 1913 | 224 / #254 / 0.044% |
| 1912 | 207 / #244 / 0.048% |
| 1911 | 124 / #230 / 0.055% |
| 1910 | 99 / #236 / 0.051% |
| 1909 | 69 / #266 / 0.042% |
| 1908 | 64 / #267 / 0.041% |
| 1907 | 56 / #281 / 0.038% |
| 1906 | 62 / #251 / 0.047% |
| 1905 | 69 / #237 / 0.052% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 62 / #239 / 0.048% |
| 1903 | 51 / #256 / 0.043% |
| 1902 | 49 / #269 / 0.040% |
| 1901 | 37 / #286 / 0.035% |
| 1900 | 45 / #317 / 0.030% |
| 1899 | 42 / #261 / 0.040% |
| 1898 | 48 / #257 / 0.039% |
| 1897 | 37 / #302 / 0.033% |
| 1896 | 52 / #253 / 0.043% |
| 1895 | 64 / #217 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 49 / #248 / 0.042% |
| 1893 | 39 / #281 / 0.035% |
| 1892 | 61 / #225 / 0.050% |
| 1891 | 29 / #313 / 0.029% |
| 1890 | 32 / #305 / 0.029% |
| 1889 | 41 / #261 / 0.037% |
| 1888 | 30 / #334 / 0.025% |
| 1887 | 42 / #246 / 0.041% |
| 1886 | 46 / #253 / 0.042% |
| 1885 | 32 / #301 / 0.030% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 44 / #257 / 0.038% |
| 1883 | 34 / #282 / 0.033% |
| 1882 | 45 / #257 / 0.040% |
| 1881 | 48 / #220 / 0.048% |
| 1880 | 57 / #211 / 0.052% |