Total babies named Emil (all years): 33,073
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 158 / #1248 / 0.009% |
| 2023 | 187 / #1129 / 0.011% |
| 2022 | 188 / #1125 / 0.011% |
| 2021 | 152 / #1256 / 0.009% |
| 2020 | 152 / #1234 / 0.009% |
| 2019 | 155 / #1227 / 0.009% |
| 2018 | 129 / #1368 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 144 / #1266 / 0.008% |
| 2016 | 125 / #1404 / 0.007% |
| 2015 | 127 / #1370 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 120 / #1403 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 115 / #1436 / 0.006% |
| 2012 | 114 / #1449 / 0.006% |
| 2011 | 106 / #1512 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 106 / #1527 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 147 / #1223 / 0.007% |
| 2008 | 134 / #1296 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 113 / #1435 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 101 / #1502 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 92 / #1538 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 79 / #1635 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 86 / #1501 / 0.004% |
| 2002 | 97 / #1362 / 0.005% |
| 2001 | 109 / #1223 / 0.006% |
| 2000 | 89 / #1403 / 0.005% |
| 1999 | 99 / #1253 / 0.005% |
| 1998 | 69 / #1547 / 0.004% |
| 1997 | 63 / #1610 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 73 / #1426 / 0.004% |
| 1995 | 90 / #1223 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 95 / #1171 / 0.005% |
| 1993 | 71 / #1361 / 0.004% |
| 1992 | 104 / #1078 / 0.005% |
| 1991 | 91 / #1157 / 0.005% |
| 1990 | 82 / #1208 / 0.004% |
| 1989 | 76 / #1231 / 0.004% |
| 1988 | 73 / #1180 / 0.004% |
| 1987 | 89 / #1006 / 0.005% |
| 1986 | 62 / #1221 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 79 / #1035 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 84 / #970 / 0.005% |
| 1983 | 98 / #890 / 0.005% |
| 1982 | 82 / #996 / 0.005% |
| 1981 | 77 / #1038 / 0.004% |
| 1980 | 89 / #954 / 0.005% |
| 1979 | 94 / #903 / 0.005% |
| 1978 | 89 / #917 / 0.005% |
| 1977 | 82 / #945 / 0.005% |
| 1976 | 89 / #885 / 0.006% |
| 1975 | 98 / #838 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 92 / #838 / 0.006% |
| 1973 | 102 / #785 / 0.007% |
| 1972 | 92 / #838 / 0.006% |
| 1971 | 101 / #800 / 0.006% |
| 1970 | 124 / #741 / 0.007% |
| 1969 | 109 / #750 / 0.006% |
| 1968 | 97 / #753 / 0.006% |
| 1967 | 102 / #731 / 0.006% |
| 1966 | 99 / #741 / 0.006% |
| 1965 | 147 / #627 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 132 / #670 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 125 / #692 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 147 / #638 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 148 / #646 / 0.007% |
| 1960 | 161 / #615 / 0.008% |
| 1959 | 161 / #609 / 0.008% |
| 1958 | 170 / #594 / 0.008% |
| 1957 | 188 / #562 / 0.009% |
| 1956 | 173 / #579 / 0.008% |
| 1955 | 179 / #551 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 179 / #542 / 0.009% |
| 1953 | 184 / #519 / 0.009% |
| 1952 | 205 / #492 / 0.011% |
| 1951 | 215 / #465 / 0.011% |
| 1950 | 206 / #463 / 0.012% |
| 1949 | 217 / #454 / 0.012% |
| 1948 | 251 / #424 / 0.014% |
| 1947 | 258 / #424 / 0.014% |
| 1946 | 246 / #407 / 0.015% |
| 1945 | 223 / #403 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 222 / #402 / 0.016% |
| 1943 | 262 / #379 / 0.018% |
| 1942 | 259 / #376 / 0.019% |
| 1941 | 297 / #334 / 0.024% |
| 1940 | 263 / #349 / 0.023% |
| 1939 | 275 / #338 / 0.025% |
| 1938 | 322 / #303 / 0.029% |
| 1937 | 275 / #327 / 0.026% |
| 1936 | 273 / #331 / 0.026% |
| 1935 | 320 / #304 / 0.031% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 335 / #297 / 0.032% |
| 1933 | 370 / #274 / 0.037% |
| 1932 | 392 / #276 / 0.038% |
| 1931 | 447 / #254 / 0.043% |
| 1930 | 509 / #246 / 0.046% |
| 1929 | 498 / #248 / 0.046% |
| 1928 | 582 / #225 / 0.053% |
| 1927 | 620 / #215 / 0.055% |
| 1926 | 682 / #203 / 0.061% |
| 1925 | 722 / #191 / 0.065% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 790 / #181 / 0.070% |
| 1923 | 798 / #175 / 0.073% |
| 1922 | 824 / #173 / 0.076% |
| 1921 | 819 / #177 / 0.074% |
| 1920 | 835 / #167 / 0.078% |
| 1919 | 847 / #159 / 0.086% |
| 1918 | 912 / #154 / 0.090% |
| 1917 | 1,004 / #137 / 0.108% |
| 1916 | 970 / #140 / 0.109% |
| 1915 | 918 / #138 / 0.108% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 684 / #143 / 0.104% |
| 1913 | 551 / #143 / 0.108% |
| 1912 | 407 / #146 / 0.095% |
| 1911 | 214 / #156 / 0.095% |
| 1910 | 194 / #161 / 0.100% |
| 1909 | 153 / #162 / 0.093% |
| 1908 | 141 / #165 / 0.091% |
| 1907 | 150 / #150 / 0.102% |
| 1906 | 139 / #148 / 0.104% |
| 1905 | 122 / #164 / 0.092% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 101 / #181 / 0.079% |
| 1903 | 128 / #145 / 0.107% |
| 1902 | 136 / #140 / 0.111% |
| 1901 | 122 / #136 / 0.115% |
| 1900 | 127 / #165 / 0.084% |
| 1899 | 128 / #124 / 0.121% |
| 1898 | 158 / #116 / 0.129% |
| 1897 | 131 / #126 / 0.116% |
| 1896 | 143 / #125 / 0.120% |
| 1895 | 136 / #122 / 0.116% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 128 / #123 / 0.111% |
| 1893 | 159 / #110 / 0.142% |
| 1892 | 157 / #112 / 0.129% |
| 1891 | 133 / #110 / 0.131% |
| 1890 | 165 / #101 / 0.149% |
| 1889 | 146 / #109 / 0.132% |
| 1888 | 142 / #116 / 0.118% |
| 1887 | 146 / #100 / 0.144% |
| 1886 | 127 / #116 / 0.115% |
| 1885 | 138 / #105 / 0.128% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 175 / #91 / 0.153% |
| 1883 | 139 / #99 / 0.133% |
| 1882 | 157 / #92 / 0.138% |
| 1881 | 145 / #90 / 0.144% |
| 1880 | 119 / #113 / 0.108% |