Total babies named Emmett (all years): 75,881
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 3,001 / #119 / 0.175% |
| 2023 | 3,073 / #118 / 0.180% |
| 2022 | 3,322 / #115 / 0.190% |
| 2021 | 3,662 / #103 / 0.209% |
| 2020 | 3,405 / #107 / 0.197% |
| 2019 | 3,554 / #107 / 0.198% |
| 2018 | 3,435 / #114 / 0.189% |
| 2017 | 3,169 / #124 / 0.171% |
| 2016 | 3,045 / #136 / 0.161% |
| 2015 | 3,043 / #139 / 0.159% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,639 / #156 / 0.137% |
| 2013 | 2,360 / #173 / 0.125% |
| 2012 | 2,027 / #186 / 0.107% |
| 2011 | 1,609 / #220 / 0.085% |
| 2010 | 1,278 / #271 / 0.067% |
| 2009 | 955 / #334 / 0.048% |
| 2008 | 479 / #548 / 0.023% |
| 2007 | 448 / #575 / 0.022% |
| 2006 | 439 / #570 / 0.021% |
| 2005 | 380 / #594 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 341 / #622 / 0.017% |
| 2003 | 287 / #678 / 0.015% |
| 2002 | 255 / #701 / 0.013% |
| 2001 | 255 / #701 / 0.013% |
| 2000 | 231 / #740 / 0.012% |
| 1999 | 188 / #810 / 0.010% |
| 1998 | 172 / #848 / 0.009% |
| 1997 | 198 / #752 / 0.011% |
| 1996 | 161 / #863 / 0.009% |
| 1995 | 173 / #814 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 165 / #828 / 0.009% |
| 1993 | 166 / #821 / 0.008% |
| 1992 | 169 / #804 / 0.008% |
| 1991 | 131 / #924 / 0.006% |
| 1990 | 117 / #966 / 0.006% |
| 1989 | 131 / #882 / 0.007% |
| 1988 | 110 / #909 / 0.006% |
| 1987 | 102 / #936 / 0.005% |
| 1986 | 102 / #907 / 0.006% |
| 1985 | 84 / #996 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 101 / #877 / 0.006% |
| 1983 | 121 / #795 / 0.007% |
| 1982 | 111 / #842 / 0.006% |
| 1981 | 103 / #876 / 0.006% |
| 1980 | 107 / #858 / 0.006% |
| 1979 | 114 / #818 / 0.007% |
| 1978 | 112 / #806 / 0.007% |
| 1977 | 123 / #769 / 0.007% |
| 1976 | 132 / #729 / 0.008% |
| 1975 | 123 / #752 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 127 / #727 / 0.008% |
| 1973 | 132 / #699 / 0.008% |
| 1972 | 148 / #661 / 0.009% |
| 1971 | 151 / #674 / 0.009% |
| 1970 | 173 / #618 / 0.009% |
| 1969 | 189 / #571 / 0.011% |
| 1968 | 189 / #548 / 0.011% |
| 1967 | 190 / #542 / 0.011% |
| 1966 | 182 / #564 / 0.010% |
| 1965 | 194 / #549 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 203 / #553 / 0.010% |
| 1963 | 198 / #561 / 0.010% |
| 1962 | 236 / #515 / 0.011% |
| 1961 | 239 / #515 / 0.011% |
| 1960 | 212 / #544 / 0.010% |
| 1959 | 288 / #470 / 0.013% |
| 1958 | 262 / #484 / 0.012% |
| 1957 | 300 / #444 / 0.014% |
| 1956 | 316 / #425 / 0.015% |
| 1955 | 298 / #424 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 283 / #426 / 0.014% |
| 1953 | 287 / #417 / 0.015% |
| 1952 | 320 / #384 / 0.016% |
| 1951 | 324 / #377 / 0.017% |
| 1950 | 310 / #381 / 0.017% |
| 1949 | 284 / #398 / 0.016% |
| 1948 | 363 / #353 / 0.021% |
| 1947 | 419 / #335 / 0.023% |
| 1946 | 359 / #341 / 0.022% |
| 1945 | 303 / #346 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 359 / #318 / 0.026% |
| 1943 | 332 / #335 / 0.023% |
| 1942 | 347 / #324 / 0.025% |
| 1941 | 327 / #325 / 0.027% |
| 1940 | 338 / #303 / 0.029% |
| 1939 | 349 / #298 / 0.032% |
| 1938 | 322 / #304 / 0.029% |
| 1937 | 320 / #301 / 0.030% |
| 1936 | 314 / #301 / 0.030% |
| 1935 | 358 / #286 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 341 / #291 / 0.033% |
| 1933 | 360 / #278 / 0.036% |
| 1932 | 356 / #288 / 0.034% |
| 1931 | 400 / #276 / 0.038% |
| 1930 | 439 / #267 / 0.040% |
| 1929 | 425 / #270 / 0.040% |
| 1928 | 456 / #266 / 0.041% |
| 1927 | 486 / #260 / 0.043% |
| 1926 | 539 / #241 / 0.049% |
| 1925 | 579 / #228 / 0.052% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 584 / #232 / 0.052% |
| 1923 | 564 / #236 / 0.051% |
| 1922 | 578 / #231 / 0.053% |
| 1921 | 608 / #218 / 0.055% |
| 1920 | 614 / #209 / 0.058% |
| 1919 | 629 / #200 / 0.064% |
| 1918 | 591 / #211 / 0.058% |
| 1917 | 542 / #207 / 0.059% |
| 1916 | 500 / #216 / 0.056% |
| 1915 | 592 / #187 / 0.070% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 406 / #204 / 0.062% |
| 1913 | 340 / #198 / 0.066% |
| 1912 | 290 / #199 / 0.067% |
| 1911 | 141 / #208 / 0.062% |
| 1910 | 159 / #179 / 0.082% |
| 1909 | 147 / #168 / 0.090% |
| 1908 | 126 / #176 / 0.082% |
| 1907 | 148 / #153 / 0.101% |
| 1906 | 94 / #193 / 0.071% |
| 1905 | 128 / #157 / 0.097% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 120 / #158 / 0.094% |
| 1903 | 97 / #170 / 0.081% |
| 1902 | 98 / #174 / 0.080% |
| 1901 | 110 / #147 / 0.103% |
| 1900 | 119 / #175 / 0.079% |
| 1899 | 97 / #156 / 0.091% |
| 1898 | 131 / #137 / 0.107% |
| 1897 | 118 / #137 / 0.105% |
| 1896 | 113 / #145 / 0.095% |
| 1895 | 138 / #121 / 0.118% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 126 / #127 / 0.109% |
| 1893 | 103 / #147 / 0.092% |
| 1892 | 117 / #137 / 0.096% |
| 1891 | 89 / #148 / 0.088% |
| 1890 | 104 / #136 / 0.094% |
| 1889 | 108 / #132 / 0.098% |
| 1888 | 100 / #152 / 0.083% |
| 1887 | 90 / #141 / 0.089% |
| 1886 | 94 / #150 / 0.085% |
| 1885 | 101 / #134 / 0.094% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 83 / #168 / 0.073% |
| 1883 | 87 / #150 / 0.083% |
| 1882 | 99 / #141 / 0.087% |
| 1881 | 65 / #179 / 0.065% |
| 1880 | 74 / #176 / 0.067% |