Total babies named Essie (all years): 40,847
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 63 / #2718 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 53 / #3108 / 0.003% |
| 2022 | 50 / #3233 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 42 / #3633 / 0.003% |
| 2020 | 33 / #4200 / 0.002% |
| 2019 | 53 / #3057 / 0.003% |
| 2018 | 42 / #3632 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 39 / #3871 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 39 / #3874 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 33 / #4330 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 28 / #4939 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 24 / #5541 / 0.001% |
| 2012 | 28 / #5010 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 12 / #9342 / 0.001% |
| 2010 | 12 / #9402 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 12 / #9578 / 0.001% |
| 2008 | 9 / #11901 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 6 / #16120 / 0.000% |
| 2006 | 9 / #11749 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 8 / #12181 / 0.000% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 11 / #9448 / 0.001% |
| 2003 | 10 / #9900 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 8 / #11345 / 0.000% |
| 2000 | 11 / #8756 / 0.001% |
| 1999 | 14 / #6943 / 0.001% |
| 1998 | 10 / #8797 / 0.001% |
| 1997 | 13 / #6982 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 10 / #8356 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 11 / #7680 / 0.001% |
| 1994 | 13 / #6801 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1993 | 15 / #6055 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 20 / #4912 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 20 / #4863 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 25 / #4041 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 22 / #4286 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 17 / #4904 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 19 / #4347 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 18 / #4406 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 33 / #2817 / 0.002% |
| 1984 | 17 / #4375 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1983 | 22 / #3598 / 0.001% |
| 1982 | 31 / #2915 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 29 / #3011 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 23 / #3539 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 27 / #3095 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 31 / #2700 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 31 / #2682 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 32 / #2499 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 24 / #2991 / 0.002% |
| 1974 | 31 / #2453 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1973 | 42 / #1950 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 38 / #2069 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 51 / #1758 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 48 / #1838 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 51 / #1693 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 60 / #1461 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 55 / #1514 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 63 / #1389 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 84 / #1172 / 0.005% |
| 1964 | 93 / #1142 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1963 | 124 / #951 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 109 / #1032 / 0.006% |
| 1961 | 114 / #1017 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 139 / #886 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 160 / #808 / 0.008% |
| 1958 | 156 / #806 / 0.008% |
| 1957 | 160 / #798 / 0.008% |
| 1956 | 212 / #659 / 0.011% |
| 1955 | 225 / #620 / 0.012% |
| 1954 | 232 / #596 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1953 | 263 / #530 / 0.014% |
| 1952 | 283 / #500 / 0.015% |
| 1951 | 270 / #501 / 0.015% |
| 1950 | 313 / #459 / 0.018% |
| 1949 | 326 / #439 / 0.019% |
| 1948 | 324 / #440 / 0.019% |
| 1947 | 327 / #451 / 0.018% |
| 1946 | 341 / #414 / 0.022% |
| 1945 | 389 / #350 / 0.030% |
| 1944 | 414 / #337 / 0.031% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1943 | 350 / #391 / 0.025% |
| 1942 | 415 / #342 / 0.031% |
| 1941 | 390 / #333 / 0.032% |
| 1940 | 420 / #309 / 0.037% |
| 1939 | 460 / #290 / 0.042% |
| 1938 | 451 / #294 / 0.041% |
| 1937 | 472 / #284 / 0.044% |
| 1936 | 494 / #274 / 0.047% |
| 1935 | 498 / #272 / 0.047% |
| 1934 | 538 / #267 / 0.052% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1933 | 568 / #257 / 0.056% |
| 1932 | 678 / #234 / 0.064% |
| 1931 | 579 / #251 / 0.054% |
| 1930 | 617 / #250 / 0.055% |
| 1929 | 667 / #239 / 0.060% |
| 1928 | 806 / #221 / 0.070% |
| 1927 | 783 / #227 / 0.066% |
| 1926 | 883 / #211 / 0.074% |
| 1925 | 925 / #211 / 0.076% |
| 1924 | 936 / #210 / 0.075% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1923 | 917 / #212 / 0.076% |
| 1922 | 1,022 / #200 / 0.085% |
| 1921 | 1,032 / #199 / 0.084% |
| 1920 | 996 / #197 / 0.083% |
| 1919 | 1,023 / #189 / 0.091% |
| 1918 | 1,019 / #194 / 0.088% |
| 1917 | 945 / #194 / 0.087% |
| 1916 | 904 / #197 / 0.087% |
| 1915 | 869 / #191 / 0.088% |
| 1914 | 737 / #181 / 0.097% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1913 | 662 / #175 / 0.106% |
| 1912 | 695 / #155 / 0.125% |
| 1911 | 525 / #156 / 0.126% |
| 1910 | 620 / #134 / 0.156% |
| 1909 | 508 / #139 / 0.146% |
| 1908 | 451 / #148 / 0.135% |
| 1907 | 486 / #137 / 0.153% |
| 1906 | 409 / #145 / 0.139% |
| 1905 | 476 / #132 / 0.163% |
| 1904 | 457 / #129 / 0.166% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1903 | 396 / #140 / 0.151% |
| 1902 | 424 / #133 / 0.161% |
| 1901 | 368 / #136 / 0.154% |
| 1900 | 492 / #129 / 0.164% |
| 1899 | 342 / #136 / 0.147% |
| 1898 | 336 / #150 / 0.130% |
| 1897 | 329 / #145 / 0.140% |
| 1896 | 381 / #126 / 0.160% |
| 1895 | 335 / #136 / 0.143% |
| 1894 | 311 / #137 / 0.140% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1893 | 258 / #153 / 0.121% |
| 1892 | 294 / #141 / 0.138% |
| 1891 | 217 / #157 / 0.117% |
| 1890 | 256 / #138 / 0.134% |
| 1889 | 265 / #136 / 0.149% |
| 1888 | 230 / #143 / 0.129% |
| 1887 | 185 / #140 / 0.127% |
| 1886 | 163 / #149 / 0.113% |
| 1885 | 153 / #149 / 0.115% |
| 1884 | 148 / #142 / 0.115% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 139 / #140 / 0.124% |
| 1882 | 113 / #153 / 0.105% |
| 1881 | 80 / #168 / 0.087% |
| 1880 | 78 / #168 / 0.086% |