Total babies named Ewell (all years): 2,058
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1982 | 6 / #5877 / 0.000% |
| 1981 | 9 / #4269 / 0.001% |
| 1979 | 12 / #3423 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 8 / #4303 / 0.000% |
| 1976 | 5 / #5882 / 0.000% |
| 1974 | 7 / #4319 / 0.000% |
| 1973 | 9 / #3530 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 5 / #5212 / 0.000% |
| 1971 | 7 / #4108 / 0.000% |
| 1970 | 7 / #3981 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1969 | 13 / #2461 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 8 / #3195 / 0.000% |
| 1967 | 14 / #2178 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 8 / #3069 / 0.000% |
| 1965 | 15 / #2114 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 7 / #3386 / 0.000% |
| 1963 | 15 / #2141 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 10 / #2724 / 0.000% |
| 1961 | 9 / #2964 / 0.000% |
| 1960 | 15 / #2160 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1959 | 21 / #1775 / 0.001% |
| 1958 | 12 / #2408 / 0.001% |
| 1957 | 14 / #2218 / 0.001% |
| 1956 | 19 / #1854 / 0.001% |
| 1955 | 20 / #1747 / 0.001% |
| 1954 | 16 / #1988 / 0.001% |
| 1953 | 16 / #1989 / 0.001% |
| 1952 | 18 / #1820 / 0.001% |
| 1951 | 26 / #1470 / 0.001% |
| 1950 | 18 / #1764 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1949 | 22 / #1592 / 0.001% |
| 1948 | 27 / #1413 / 0.002% |
| 1947 | 24 / #1530 / 0.001% |
| 1946 | 21 / #1574 / 0.001% |
| 1945 | 23 / #1391 / 0.002% |
| 1944 | 19 / #1593 / 0.001% |
| 1943 | 29 / #1288 / 0.002% |
| 1942 | 21 / #1554 / 0.002% |
| 1941 | 18 / #1655 / 0.001% |
| 1940 | 31 / #1215 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1939 | 24 / #1368 / 0.002% |
| 1938 | 35 / #1101 / 0.003% |
| 1937 | 21 / #1496 / 0.002% |
| 1936 | 35 / #1105 / 0.003% |
| 1935 | 29 / #1255 / 0.003% |
| 1934 | 37 / #1080 / 0.004% |
| 1933 | 43 / #966 / 0.004% |
| 1932 | 41 / #1043 / 0.004% |
| 1931 | 48 / #947 / 0.005% |
| 1930 | 35 / #1200 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1929 | 46 / #999 / 0.004% |
| 1928 | 52 / #940 / 0.005% |
| 1927 | 48 / #1014 / 0.004% |
| 1926 | 63 / #836 / 0.006% |
| 1925 | 51 / #947 / 0.005% |
| 1924 | 46 / #1049 / 0.004% |
| 1923 | 59 / #885 / 0.005% |
| 1922 | 52 / #981 / 0.005% |
| 1921 | 56 / #939 / 0.005% |
| 1920 | 48 / #994 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1919 | 71 / #767 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 63 / #827 / 0.006% |
| 1917 | 41 / #1023 / 0.004% |
| 1916 | 45 / #956 / 0.005% |
| 1915 | 46 / #918 / 0.005% |
| 1914 | 37 / #903 / 0.006% |
| 1913 | 29 / #919 / 0.006% |
| 1912 | 29 / #821 / 0.007% |
| 1911 | 16 / #839 / 0.007% |
| 1910 | 9 / #1143 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1909 | 14 / #772 / 0.009% |
| 1908 | 9 / #974 / 0.006% |
| 1907 | 8 / #1028 / 0.005% |
| 1906 | 13 / #688 / 0.010% |
| 1905 | 8 / #950 / 0.006% |
| 1904 | 8 / #915 / 0.006% |
| 1903 | 12 / #670 / 0.010% |
| 1902 | 9 / #814 / 0.007% |
| 1901 | 7 / #888 / 0.007% |
| 1900 | 11 / #803 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1899 | 9 / #736 / 0.008% |
| 1898 | 6 / #1047 / 0.005% |
| 1897 | 8 / #810 / 0.007% |
| 1896 | 5 / #1153 / 0.004% |
| 1895 | 7 / #919 / 0.006% |
| 1894 | 5 / #1135 / 0.004% |
| 1893 | 5 / #1096 / 0.004% |
| 1892 | 7 / #884 / 0.006% |
| 1890 | 6 / #929 / 0.005% |
| 1889 | 7 / #828 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1888 | 5 / #1083 / 0.004% |
| 1887 | 6 / #858 / 0.006% |
| 1885 | 5 / #986 / 0.005% |
| 1883 | 7 / #752 / 0.007% |
| 1882 | 5 / #987 / 0.004% |