Total babies named Forest (all years): 18,013
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 361 / #724 / 0.021% |
| 2023 | 350 / #746 / 0.020% |
| 2022 | 375 / #703 / 0.022% |
| 2021 | 360 / #718 / 0.021% |
| 2020 | 289 / #802 / 0.017% |
| 2019 | 243 / #905 / 0.014% |
| 2018 | 212 / #979 / 0.012% |
| 2017 | 201 / #1007 / 0.011% |
| 2016 | 178 / #1102 / 0.009% |
| 2015 | 135 / #1309 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 132 / #1325 / 0.007% |
| 2013 | 104 / #1537 / 0.006% |
| 2012 | 76 / #1898 / 0.004% |
| 2011 | 84 / #1743 / 0.004% |
| 2010 | 83 / #1785 / 0.004% |
| 2009 | 67 / #2058 / 0.003% |
| 2008 | 79 / #1844 / 0.004% |
| 2007 | 69 / #2021 / 0.003% |
| 2006 | 47 / #2551 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 62 / #2016 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 55 / #2141 / 0.003% |
| 2003 | 69 / #1751 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 67 / #1728 / 0.003% |
| 2001 | 59 / #1876 / 0.003% |
| 2000 | 83 / #1481 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 80 / #1450 / 0.004% |
| 1998 | 110 / #1135 / 0.006% |
| 1997 | 105 / #1162 / 0.006% |
| 1996 | 115 / #1060 / 0.006% |
| 1995 | 205 / #749 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 252 / #655 / 0.013% |
| 1993 | 207 / #721 / 0.011% |
| 1992 | 165 / #817 / 0.008% |
| 1991 | 131 / #925 / 0.006% |
| 1990 | 97 / #1084 / 0.005% |
| 1989 | 92 / #1105 / 0.005% |
| 1988 | 82 / #1101 / 0.004% |
| 1987 | 86 / #1028 / 0.005% |
| 1986 | 80 / #1046 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 48 / #1419 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 70 / #1070 / 0.004% |
| 1983 | 71 / #1054 / 0.004% |
| 1982 | 72 / #1077 / 0.004% |
| 1981 | 83 / #996 / 0.005% |
| 1980 | 103 / #884 / 0.006% |
| 1979 | 80 / #995 / 0.005% |
| 1978 | 68 / #1057 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 86 / #916 / 0.005% |
| 1976 | 81 / #931 / 0.005% |
| 1975 | 76 / #942 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 87 / #858 / 0.006% |
| 1973 | 57 / #1078 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 64 / #1009 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 87 / #876 / 0.005% |
| 1970 | 72 / #943 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 51 / #1089 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 78 / #831 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 60 / #936 / 0.003% |
| 1966 | 74 / #846 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 87 / #799 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 82 / #843 / 0.004% |
| 1963 | 84 / #828 / 0.004% |
| 1962 | 88 / #811 / 0.004% |
| 1961 | 85 / #833 / 0.004% |
| 1960 | 90 / #807 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 91 / #802 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 112 / #712 / 0.005% |
| 1957 | 107 / #724 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 93 / #765 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 104 / #717 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 103 / #715 / 0.005% |
| 1953 | 112 / #678 / 0.006% |
| 1952 | 98 / #710 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 102 / #693 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 115 / #648 / 0.006% |
| 1949 | 134 / #583 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 108 / #655 / 0.006% |
| 1947 | 164 / #528 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 100 / #644 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 111 / #577 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 139 / #513 / 0.010% |
| 1943 | 128 / #560 / 0.009% |
| 1942 | 127 / #545 / 0.009% |
| 1941 | 141 / #491 / 0.011% |
| 1940 | 124 / #521 / 0.011% |
| 1939 | 125 / #507 / 0.011% |
| 1938 | 110 / #555 / 0.010% |
| 1937 | 143 / #472 / 0.013% |
| 1936 | 119 / #519 / 0.011% |
| 1935 | 129 / #506 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 137 / #491 / 0.013% |
| 1933 | 171 / #415 / 0.017% |
| 1932 | 155 / #458 / 0.015% |
| 1931 | 198 / #402 / 0.019% |
| 1930 | 206 / #409 / 0.019% |
| 1929 | 222 / #390 / 0.021% |
| 1928 | 242 / #376 / 0.022% |
| 1927 | 229 / #395 / 0.020% |
| 1926 | 235 / #382 / 0.021% |
| 1925 | 251 / #376 / 0.022% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 269 / #366 / 0.024% |
| 1923 | 270 / #362 / 0.025% |
| 1922 | 299 / #341 / 0.027% |
| 1921 | 253 / #380 / 0.023% |
| 1920 | 292 / #343 / 0.027% |
| 1919 | 296 / #326 / 0.030% |
| 1918 | 316 / #320 / 0.031% |
| 1917 | 286 / #320 / 0.031% |
| 1916 | 300 / #299 / 0.034% |
| 1915 | 252 / #333 / 0.030% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 228 / #299 / 0.035% |
| 1913 | 176 / #300 / 0.034% |
| 1912 | 121 / #343 / 0.028% |
| 1911 | 85 / #287 / 0.038% |
| 1910 | 65 / #304 / 0.033% |
| 1909 | 47 / #341 / 0.029% |
| 1908 | 50 / #312 / 0.032% |
| 1907 | 61 / #269 / 0.042% |
| 1906 | 58 / #260 / 0.044% |
| 1905 | 56 / #264 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 65 / #235 / 0.051% |
| 1903 | 47 / #270 / 0.039% |
| 1902 | 59 / #238 / 0.048% |
| 1901 | 45 / #256 / 0.042% |
| 1900 | 53 / #285 / 0.035% |
| 1899 | 38 / #283 / 0.036% |
| 1898 | 62 / #223 / 0.051% |
| 1897 | 50 / #246 / 0.044% |
| 1896 | 50 / #258 / 0.042% |
| 1895 | 52 / #249 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 32 / #310 / 0.028% |
| 1893 | 59 / #223 / 0.053% |
| 1892 | 49 / #254 / 0.040% |
| 1891 | 41 / #249 / 0.041% |
| 1890 | 37 / #285 / 0.033% |
| 1889 | 24 / #363 / 0.022% |
| 1888 | 36 / #298 / 0.030% |
| 1887 | 28 / #313 / 0.028% |
| 1886 | 44 / #257 / 0.040% |
| 1885 | 30 / #310 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 33 / #302 / 0.029% |
| 1883 | 28 / #312 / 0.027% |
| 1882 | 27 / #335 / 0.024% |
| 1881 | 18 / #401 / 0.018% |
| 1880 | 30 / #308 / 0.027% |