Total babies named Fredrick (all years): 64,685
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 102 / #1651 / 0.006% |
| 2023 | 109 / #1592 / 0.006% |
| 2022 | 133 / #1397 / 0.008% |
| 2021 | 130 / #1412 / 0.007% |
| 2020 | 121 / #1427 / 0.007% |
| 2019 | 120 / #1455 / 0.007% |
| 2018 | 124 / #1412 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 150 / #1225 / 0.008% |
| 2016 | 126 / #1394 / 0.007% |
| 2015 | 151 / #1219 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 141 / #1265 / 0.007% |
| 2013 | 157 / #1151 / 0.008% |
| 2012 | 125 / #1355 / 0.007% |
| 2011 | 140 / #1241 / 0.007% |
| 2010 | 164 / #1133 / 0.009% |
| 2009 | 197 / #998 / 0.010% |
| 2008 | 165 / #1113 / 0.008% |
| 2007 | 214 / #928 / 0.010% |
| 2006 | 217 / #896 / 0.011% |
| 2005 | 191 / #920 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 227 / #795 / 0.011% |
| 2003 | 212 / #827 / 0.011% |
| 2002 | 200 / #834 / 0.010% |
| 2001 | 224 / #769 / 0.012% |
| 2000 | 242 / #718 / 0.012% |
| 1999 | 248 / #681 / 0.013% |
| 1998 | 295 / #622 / 0.015% |
| 1997 | 276 / #627 / 0.015% |
| 1996 | 308 / #584 / 0.016% |
| 1995 | 354 / #539 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 317 / #583 / 0.016% |
| 1993 | 354 / #545 / 0.018% |
| 1992 | 398 / #507 / 0.020% |
| 1991 | 413 / #489 / 0.020% |
| 1990 | 446 / #468 / 0.022% |
| 1989 | 434 / #451 / 0.022% |
| 1988 | 373 / #477 / 0.019% |
| 1987 | 385 / #453 / 0.021% |
| 1986 | 405 / #429 / 0.022% |
| 1985 | 505 / #363 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 471 / #374 / 0.026% |
| 1983 | 494 / #358 / 0.028% |
| 1982 | 577 / #331 / 0.032% |
| 1981 | 595 / #321 / 0.033% |
| 1980 | 621 / #310 / 0.035% |
| 1979 | 648 / #304 / 0.038% |
| 1978 | 669 / #287 / 0.041% |
| 1977 | 660 / #295 / 0.040% |
| 1976 | 634 / #294 / 0.040% |
| 1975 | 720 / #268 / 0.046% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 729 / #263 / 0.046% |
| 1973 | 774 / #254 / 0.050% |
| 1972 | 944 / #228 / 0.058% |
| 1971 | 1,022 / #232 / 0.058% |
| 1970 | 942 / #247 / 0.051% |
| 1969 | 786 / #265 / 0.044% |
| 1968 | 821 / #250 / 0.047% |
| 1967 | 787 / #256 / 0.045% |
| 1966 | 844 / #247 / 0.047% |
| 1965 | 818 / #258 / 0.044% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 870 / #261 / 0.044% |
| 1963 | 811 / #268 / 0.040% |
| 1962 | 818 / #267 / 0.040% |
| 1961 | 898 / #262 / 0.042% |
| 1960 | 905 / #263 / 0.042% |
| 1959 | 922 / #263 / 0.043% |
| 1958 | 958 / #252 / 0.045% |
| 1957 | 1,046 / #236 / 0.048% |
| 1956 | 1,137 / #216 / 0.054% |
| 1955 | 1,169 / #209 / 0.057% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,235 / #201 / 0.061% |
| 1953 | 1,341 / #189 / 0.068% |
| 1952 | 1,211 / #192 / 0.062% |
| 1951 | 1,166 / #194 / 0.062% |
| 1950 | 1,162 / #190 / 0.065% |
| 1949 | 1,032 / #199 / 0.058% |
| 1948 | 939 / #207 / 0.054% |
| 1947 | 917 / #211 / 0.050% |
| 1946 | 845 / #203 / 0.052% |
| 1945 | 707 / #204 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 736 / #203 / 0.054% |
| 1943 | 796 / #202 / 0.056% |
| 1942 | 789 / #199 / 0.057% |
| 1941 | 729 / #197 / 0.059% |
| 1940 | 742 / #191 / 0.064% |
| 1939 | 629 / #198 / 0.057% |
| 1938 | 664 / #194 / 0.060% |
| 1937 | 602 / #202 / 0.056% |
| 1936 | 626 / #198 / 0.060% |
| 1935 | 545 / #220 / 0.052% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 456 / #254 / 0.044% |
| 1933 | 516 / #225 / 0.052% |
| 1932 | 487 / #242 / 0.047% |
| 1931 | 502 / #234 / 0.048% |
| 1930 | 548 / #230 / 0.050% |
| 1929 | 505 / #243 / 0.047% |
| 1928 | 547 / #236 / 0.049% |
| 1927 | 563 / #235 / 0.050% |
| 1926 | 626 / #218 / 0.056% |
| 1925 | 549 / #240 / 0.049% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 585 / #231 / 0.052% |
| 1923 | 587 / #223 / 0.054% |
| 1922 | 539 / #244 / 0.050% |
| 1921 | 582 / #229 / 0.053% |
| 1920 | 558 / #226 / 0.052% |
| 1919 | 467 / #244 / 0.048% |
| 1918 | 503 / #238 / 0.050% |
| 1917 | 471 / #229 / 0.051% |
| 1916 | 437 / #241 / 0.049% |
| 1915 | 426 / #232 / 0.050% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 345 / #228 / 0.053% |
| 1913 | 241 / #244 / 0.047% |
| 1912 | 193 / #255 / 0.045% |
| 1911 | 95 / #266 / 0.042% |
| 1910 | 70 / #298 / 0.036% |
| 1909 | 56 / #308 / 0.034% |
| 1908 | 66 / #261 / 0.043% |
| 1907 | 57 / #277 / 0.039% |
| 1906 | 48 / #293 / 0.036% |
| 1905 | 49 / #282 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 43 / #297 / 0.034% |
| 1903 | 59 / #235 / 0.049% |
| 1902 | 42 / #295 / 0.034% |
| 1901 | 49 / #246 / 0.046% |
| 1900 | 67 / #250 / 0.045% |
| 1899 | 43 / #255 / 0.040% |
| 1898 | 72 / #206 / 0.059% |
| 1897 | 65 / #210 / 0.058% |
| 1896 | 48 / #260 / 0.040% |
| 1895 | 62 / #220 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 50 / #245 / 0.043% |
| 1893 | 73 / #197 / 0.065% |
| 1892 | 69 / #211 / 0.057% |
| 1891 | 55 / #215 / 0.054% |
| 1890 | 80 / #173 / 0.072% |
| 1889 | 68 / #192 / 0.061% |
| 1888 | 82 / #181 / 0.068% |
| 1887 | 82 / #153 / 0.081% |
| 1886 | 75 / #180 / 0.068% |
| 1885 | 62 / #202 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 86 / #161 / 0.075% |
| 1883 | 84 / #155 / 0.080% |
| 1882 | 76 / #177 / 0.067% |
| 1881 | 65 / #180 / 0.065% |
| 1880 | 103 / #126 / 0.093% |