Total babies named Hugo (all years): 36,674
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 797 / #403 / 0.046% |
| 2023 | 769 / #415 / 0.045% |
| 2022 | 799 / #401 / 0.046% |
| 2021 | 714 / #437 / 0.041% |
| 2020 | 709 / #421 / 0.041% |
| 2019 | 648 / #462 / 0.036% |
| 2018 | 733 / #422 / 0.040% |
| 2017 | 750 / #416 / 0.041% |
| 2016 | 723 / #430 / 0.038% |
| 2015 | 708 / #432 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 695 / #436 / 0.036% |
| 2013 | 656 / #439 / 0.035% |
| 2012 | 639 / #433 / 0.034% |
| 2011 | 618 / #439 / 0.033% |
| 2010 | 616 / #440 / 0.032% |
| 2009 | 722 / #407 / 0.036% |
| 2008 | 779 / #388 / 0.038% |
| 2007 | 740 / #400 / 0.036% |
| 2006 | 811 / #370 / 0.039% |
| 2005 | 796 / #371 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 759 / #366 / 0.038% |
| 2003 | 727 / #365 / 0.037% |
| 2002 | 715 / #368 / 0.037% |
| 2001 | 637 / #396 / 0.033% |
| 2000 | 638 / #399 / 0.032% |
| 1999 | 598 / #406 / 0.031% |
| 1998 | 570 / #416 / 0.030% |
| 1997 | 530 / #429 / 0.028% |
| 1996 | 519 / #432 / 0.027% |
| 1995 | 528 / #432 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 548 / #419 / 0.028% |
| 1993 | 587 / #393 / 0.030% |
| 1992 | 613 / #377 / 0.031% |
| 1991 | 566 / #402 / 0.028% |
| 1990 | 552 / #416 / 0.027% |
| 1989 | 524 / #407 / 0.026% |
| 1988 | 421 / #439 / 0.022% |
| 1987 | 369 / #461 / 0.020% |
| 1986 | 368 / #454 / 0.020% |
| 1985 | 344 / #465 / 0.019% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 298 / #486 / 0.017% |
| 1983 | 293 / #493 / 0.016% |
| 1982 | 350 / #456 / 0.019% |
| 1981 | 426 / #393 / 0.024% |
| 1980 | 340 / #456 / 0.019% |
| 1979 | 304 / #471 / 0.018% |
| 1978 | 220 / #565 / 0.013% |
| 1977 | 255 / #518 / 0.016% |
| 1976 | 242 / #517 / 0.015% |
| 1975 | 241 / #516 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 251 / #502 / 0.016% |
| 1973 | 215 / #535 / 0.014% |
| 1972 | 175 / #602 / 0.011% |
| 1971 | 204 / #574 / 0.012% |
| 1970 | 162 / #639 / 0.009% |
| 1969 | 155 / #638 / 0.009% |
| 1968 | 156 / #610 / 0.009% |
| 1967 | 118 / #685 / 0.007% |
| 1966 | 123 / #668 / 0.007% |
| 1965 | 122 / #674 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 103 / #755 / 0.005% |
| 1963 | 108 / #750 / 0.005% |
| 1962 | 121 / #700 / 0.006% |
| 1961 | 96 / #781 / 0.005% |
| 1960 | 96 / #778 / 0.005% |
| 1959 | 99 / #771 / 0.005% |
| 1958 | 89 / #792 / 0.004% |
| 1957 | 91 / #787 / 0.004% |
| 1956 | 73 / #878 / 0.003% |
| 1955 | 79 / #826 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 80 / #811 / 0.004% |
| 1953 | 72 / #850 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 81 / #782 / 0.004% |
| 1951 | 71 / #833 / 0.004% |
| 1950 | 59 / #894 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 57 / #916 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 45 / #1053 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 55 / #960 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 59 / #858 / 0.004% |
| 1945 | 63 / #779 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 46 / #957 / 0.003% |
| 1943 | 66 / #811 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 49 / #951 / 0.004% |
| 1941 | 48 / #922 / 0.004% |
| 1940 | 41 / #1012 / 0.004% |
| 1939 | 52 / #848 / 0.005% |
| 1938 | 57 / #823 / 0.005% |
| 1937 | 77 / #684 / 0.007% |
| 1936 | 72 / #703 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 75 / #699 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 66 / #756 / 0.006% |
| 1933 | 75 / #686 / 0.008% |
| 1932 | 97 / #598 / 0.009% |
| 1931 | 98 / #595 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 143 / #499 / 0.013% |
| 1929 | 152 / #476 / 0.014% |
| 1928 | 132 / #527 / 0.012% |
| 1927 | 132 / #533 / 0.012% |
| 1926 | 159 / #477 / 0.014% |
| 1925 | 157 / #485 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 159 / #491 / 0.014% |
| 1923 | 151 / #498 / 0.014% |
| 1922 | 139 / #532 / 0.013% |
| 1921 | 201 / #429 / 0.018% |
| 1920 | 161 / #479 / 0.015% |
| 1919 | 159 / #474 / 0.016% |
| 1918 | 184 / #435 / 0.018% |
| 1917 | 183 / #417 / 0.020% |
| 1916 | 200 / #392 / 0.022% |
| 1915 | 195 / #385 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 169 / #363 / 0.026% |
| 1913 | 117 / #395 / 0.023% |
| 1912 | 107 / #373 / 0.025% |
| 1911 | 59 / #358 / 0.026% |
| 1910 | 39 / #440 / 0.020% |
| 1909 | 30 / #464 / 0.018% |
| 1908 | 31 / #433 / 0.020% |
| 1907 | 23 / #490 / 0.016% |
| 1906 | 27 / #426 / 0.020% |
| 1905 | 16 / #603 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 26 / #412 / 0.020% |
| 1903 | 19 / #493 / 0.016% |
| 1902 | 26 / #398 / 0.021% |
| 1901 | 30 / #328 / 0.028% |
| 1900 | 23 / #484 / 0.015% |
| 1899 | 18 / #446 / 0.017% |
| 1898 | 25 / #401 / 0.020% |
| 1897 | 23 / #396 / 0.020% |
| 1896 | 31 / #344 / 0.026% |
| 1895 | 39 / #284 / 0.033% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 32 / #311 / 0.028% |
| 1893 | 36 / #288 / 0.032% |
| 1892 | 37 / #306 / 0.030% |
| 1891 | 27 / #328 / 0.027% |
| 1890 | 43 / #265 / 0.039% |
| 1889 | 33 / #299 / 0.030% |
| 1888 | 27 / #356 / 0.022% |
| 1887 | 30 / #306 / 0.030% |
| 1886 | 19 / #410 / 0.017% |
| 1885 | 34 / #287 / 0.032% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 17 / #457 / 0.015% |
| 1883 | 38 / #269 / 0.036% |
| 1882 | 19 / #419 / 0.017% |
| 1881 | 36 / #263 / 0.036% |
| 1880 | 24 / #351 / 0.022% |