Total babies named Ina (all years): 34,073
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 66 / #2636 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 38 / #3931 / 0.002% |
| 2022 | 45 / #3497 / 0.003% |
| 2021 | 38 / #3901 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 48 / #3244 / 0.003% |
| 2019 | 41 / #3684 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 66 / #2623 / 0.004% |
| 2017 | 57 / #2911 / 0.003% |
| 2016 | 51 / #3198 / 0.003% |
| 2015 | 56 / #3041 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 44 / #3560 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 43 / #3601 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 41 / #3808 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 37 / #4026 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 31 / #4655 / 0.002% |
| 2009 | 36 / #4221 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 37 / #4214 / 0.002% |
| 2007 | 46 / #3553 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 33 / #4392 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 31 / #4409 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 37 / #3849 / 0.002% |
| 2003 | 35 / #3905 / 0.002% |
| 2002 | 42 / #3297 / 0.002% |
| 2001 | 39 / #3443 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 39 / #3419 / 0.002% |
| 1999 | 41 / #3159 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 39 / #3188 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 36 / #3251 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 25 / #4233 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 40 / #2943 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 34 / #3321 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 25 / #4146 / 0.001% |
| 1992 | 30 / #3609 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 35 / #3174 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 35 / #3178 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 39 / #2833 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 39 / #2714 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 37 / #2680 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 39 / #2531 / 0.002% |
| 1985 | 41 / #2413 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 41 / #2352 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 34 / #2610 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 47 / #2162 / 0.003% |
| 1981 | 48 / #2131 / 0.003% |
| 1980 | 50 / #2077 / 0.003% |
| 1979 | 58 / #1838 / 0.004% |
| 1978 | 65 / #1642 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 52 / #1910 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 58 / #1687 / 0.004% |
| 1975 | 69 / #1489 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 82 / #1303 / 0.006% |
| 1973 | 78 / #1308 / 0.005% |
| 1972 | 70 / #1407 / 0.005% |
| 1971 | 78 / #1369 / 0.005% |
| 1970 | 94 / #1202 / 0.005% |
| 1969 | 105 / #1082 / 0.006% |
| 1968 | 101 / #1035 / 0.006% |
| 1967 | 86 / #1143 / 0.005% |
| 1966 | 126 / #897 / 0.007% |
| 1965 | 129 / #879 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 124 / #946 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 137 / #895 / 0.007% |
| 1962 | 145 / #872 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 151 / #867 / 0.007% |
| 1960 | 149 / #851 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 172 / #777 / 0.009% |
| 1958 | 175 / #752 / 0.009% |
| 1957 | 177 / #749 / 0.009% |
| 1956 | 226 / #635 / 0.011% |
| 1955 | 207 / #648 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 245 / #572 / 0.013% |
| 1953 | 235 / #576 / 0.012% |
| 1952 | 261 / #524 / 0.014% |
| 1951 | 246 / #533 / 0.014% |
| 1950 | 266 / #493 / 0.016% |
| 1949 | 351 / #420 / 0.021% |
| 1948 | 324 / #441 / 0.019% |
| 1947 | 360 / #428 / 0.020% |
| 1946 | 340 / #415 / 0.022% |
| 1945 | 342 / #382 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 347 / #380 / 0.026% |
| 1943 | 448 / #333 / 0.032% |
| 1942 | 426 / #337 / 0.032% |
| 1941 | 410 / #324 / 0.034% |
| 1940 | 423 / #307 / 0.037% |
| 1939 | 466 / #289 / 0.042% |
| 1938 | 489 / #284 / 0.044% |
| 1937 | 514 / #276 / 0.048% |
| 1936 | 531 / #262 / 0.051% |
| 1935 | 528 / #267 / 0.050% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 571 / #262 / 0.055% |
| 1933 | 542 / #263 / 0.054% |
| 1932 | 654 / #242 / 0.061% |
| 1931 | 616 / #245 / 0.058% |
| 1930 | 623 / #248 / 0.055% |
| 1929 | 677 / #232 / 0.061% |
| 1928 | 612 / #261 / 0.053% |
| 1927 | 624 / #264 / 0.052% |
| 1926 | 677 / #253 / 0.057% |
| 1925 | 737 / #244 / 0.061% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 700 / #250 / 0.056% |
| 1923 | 621 / #259 / 0.051% |
| 1922 | 689 / #248 / 0.057% |
| 1921 | 745 / #242 / 0.060% |
| 1920 | 683 / #251 / 0.057% |
| 1919 | 710 / #238 / 0.063% |
| 1918 | 707 / #240 / 0.061% |
| 1917 | 691 / #237 / 0.064% |
| 1916 | 671 / #238 / 0.064% |
| 1915 | 705 / #223 / 0.072% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 495 / #239 / 0.065% |
| 1913 | 469 / #221 / 0.075% |
| 1912 | 419 / #219 / 0.075% |
| 1911 | 306 / #226 / 0.073% |
| 1910 | 296 / #216 / 0.075% |
| 1909 | 287 / #200 / 0.083% |
| 1908 | 299 / #189 / 0.089% |
| 1907 | 289 / #189 / 0.091% |
| 1906 | 262 / #189 / 0.089% |
| 1905 | 283 / #179 / 0.097% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 230 / #196 / 0.084% |
| 1903 | 256 / #181 / 0.098% |
| 1902 | 224 / #194 / 0.085% |
| 1901 | 249 / #177 / 0.104% |
| 1900 | 288 / #182 / 0.096% |
| 1899 | 243 / #176 / 0.104% |
| 1898 | 297 / #168 / 0.115% |
| 1897 | 262 / #170 / 0.112% |
| 1896 | 238 / #177 / 0.100% |
| 1895 | 220 / #179 / 0.094% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 242 / #166 / 0.109% |
| 1893 | 248 / #158 / 0.116% |
| 1892 | 216 / #171 / 0.102% |
| 1891 | 216 / #158 / 0.116% |
| 1890 | 215 / #165 / 0.113% |
| 1889 | 209 / #150 / 0.117% |
| 1888 | 206 / #153 / 0.115% |
| 1887 | 178 / #145 / 0.122% |
| 1886 | 149 / #157 / 0.103% |
| 1885 | 126 / #164 / 0.095% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 134 / #154 / 0.104% |
| 1883 | 113 / #158 / 0.101% |
| 1882 | 104 / #157 / 0.096% |
| 1881 | 108 / #145 / 0.117% |
| 1880 | 79 / #167 / 0.087% |