Total babies named Irvin (all years): 39,915
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 72 / #2077 / 0.004% |
| 2023 | 73 / #2050 / 0.004% |
| 2022 | 88 / #1833 / 0.005% |
| 2021 | 90 / #1774 / 0.005% |
| 2020 | 82 / #1818 / 0.005% |
| 2019 | 100 / #1637 / 0.006% |
| 2018 | 127 / #1390 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 122 / #1425 / 0.007% |
| 2016 | 107 / #1548 / 0.006% |
| 2015 | 113 / #1477 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 142 / #1259 / 0.007% |
| 2013 | 148 / #1209 / 0.008% |
| 2012 | 194 / #1015 / 0.010% |
| 2011 | 249 / #858 / 0.013% |
| 2010 | 219 / #921 / 0.011% |
| 2009 | 291 / #781 / 0.015% |
| 2008 | 320 / #721 / 0.016% |
| 2007 | 316 / #725 / 0.015% |
| 2006 | 341 / #668 / 0.017% |
| 2005 | 366 / #613 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 307 / #664 / 0.015% |
| 2003 | 323 / #634 / 0.016% |
| 2002 | 297 / #646 / 0.015% |
| 2001 | 282 / #656 / 0.015% |
| 2000 | 272 / #661 / 0.014% |
| 1999 | 265 / #654 / 0.014% |
| 1998 | 274 / #642 / 0.014% |
| 1997 | 298 / #595 / 0.016% |
| 1996 | 291 / #608 / 0.015% |
| 1995 | 294 / #599 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 261 / #642 / 0.014% |
| 1993 | 277 / #620 / 0.014% |
| 1992 | 353 / #543 / 0.018% |
| 1991 | 407 / #493 / 0.020% |
| 1990 | 270 / #613 / 0.013% |
| 1989 | 267 / #600 / 0.013% |
| 1988 | 328 / #506 / 0.017% |
| 1987 | 143 / #770 / 0.008% |
| 1986 | 87 / #994 / 0.005% |
| 1985 | 92 / #954 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 86 / #955 / 0.005% |
| 1983 | 104 / #859 / 0.006% |
| 1982 | 75 / #1052 / 0.004% |
| 1981 | 113 / #830 / 0.006% |
| 1980 | 106 / #865 / 0.006% |
| 1979 | 101 / #867 / 0.006% |
| 1978 | 109 / #818 / 0.007% |
| 1977 | 93 / #876 / 0.006% |
| 1976 | 96 / #851 / 0.006% |
| 1975 | 97 / #847 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 122 / #735 / 0.008% |
| 1973 | 145 / #662 / 0.009% |
| 1972 | 116 / #736 / 0.007% |
| 1971 | 149 / #680 / 0.008% |
| 1970 | 160 / #644 / 0.009% |
| 1969 | 162 / #613 / 0.009% |
| 1968 | 159 / #604 / 0.009% |
| 1967 | 153 / #606 / 0.009% |
| 1966 | 161 / #591 / 0.009% |
| 1965 | 223 / #509 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 205 / #551 / 0.010% |
| 1963 | 246 / #511 / 0.012% |
| 1962 | 262 / #490 / 0.013% |
| 1961 | 254 / #498 / 0.012% |
| 1960 | 300 / #460 / 0.014% |
| 1959 | 272 / #474 / 0.013% |
| 1958 | 280 / #475 / 0.013% |
| 1957 | 301 / #442 / 0.014% |
| 1956 | 355 / #404 / 0.017% |
| 1955 | 349 / #386 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 350 / #381 / 0.017% |
| 1953 | 332 / #380 / 0.017% |
| 1952 | 391 / #348 / 0.020% |
| 1951 | 370 / #359 / 0.020% |
| 1950 | 371 / #348 / 0.021% |
| 1949 | 378 / #344 / 0.021% |
| 1948 | 358 / #355 / 0.020% |
| 1947 | 397 / #343 / 0.022% |
| 1946 | 366 / #337 / 0.023% |
| 1945 | 351 / #317 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 380 / #310 / 0.028% |
| 1943 | 417 / #303 / 0.029% |
| 1942 | 445 / #286 / 0.032% |
| 1941 | 392 / #294 / 0.032% |
| 1940 | 409 / #276 / 0.035% |
| 1939 | 393 / #280 / 0.036% |
| 1938 | 414 / #270 / 0.037% |
| 1937 | 455 / #251 / 0.043% |
| 1936 | 443 / #251 / 0.043% |
| 1935 | 475 / #244 / 0.046% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 471 / #243 / 0.046% |
| 1933 | 446 / #246 / 0.045% |
| 1932 | 518 / #232 / 0.050% |
| 1931 | 547 / #223 / 0.053% |
| 1930 | 598 / #218 / 0.054% |
| 1929 | 646 / #204 / 0.060% |
| 1928 | 687 / #199 / 0.062% |
| 1927 | 669 / #207 / 0.059% |
| 1926 | 675 / #205 / 0.061% |
| 1925 | 707 / #199 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 763 / #187 / 0.067% |
| 1923 | 817 / #173 / 0.075% |
| 1922 | 718 / #192 / 0.066% |
| 1921 | 789 / #179 / 0.072% |
| 1920 | 775 / #182 / 0.073% |
| 1919 | 764 / #172 / 0.078% |
| 1918 | 798 / #169 / 0.079% |
| 1917 | 734 / #170 / 0.079% |
| 1916 | 724 / #164 / 0.081% |
| 1915 | 681 / #168 / 0.080% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 491 / #181 / 0.075% |
| 1913 | 422 / #165 / 0.082% |
| 1912 | 344 / #170 / 0.080% |
| 1911 | 164 / #191 / 0.073% |
| 1910 | 137 / #192 / 0.071% |
| 1909 | 109 / #198 / 0.066% |
| 1908 | 104 / #198 / 0.067% |
| 1907 | 120 / #183 / 0.082% |
| 1906 | 88 / #200 / 0.066% |
| 1905 | 87 / #198 / 0.066% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 107 / #170 / 0.084% |
| 1903 | 95 / #173 / 0.080% |
| 1902 | 91 / #184 / 0.074% |
| 1901 | 88 / #168 / 0.083% |
| 1900 | 118 / #177 / 0.078% |
| 1899 | 73 / #188 / 0.069% |
| 1898 | 79 / #191 / 0.064% |
| 1897 | 75 / #197 / 0.067% |
| 1896 | 79 / #201 / 0.066% |
| 1895 | 65 / #214 / 0.055% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 90 / #169 / 0.078% |
| 1893 | 88 / #164 / 0.078% |
| 1892 | 85 / #185 / 0.070% |
| 1891 | 73 / #179 / 0.072% |
| 1890 | 82 / #172 / 0.074% |
| 1889 | 76 / #177 / 0.069% |
| 1888 | 78 / #191 / 0.065% |
| 1887 | 55 / #207 / 0.054% |
| 1886 | 71 / #190 / 0.064% |
| 1885 | 91 / #149 / 0.084% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 86 / #162 / 0.075% |
| 1883 | 73 / #169 / 0.070% |
| 1882 | 66 / #195 / 0.058% |
| 1881 | 88 / #140 / 0.087% |
| 1880 | 86 / #159 / 0.078% |