Total babies named Isaac (all years): 326,231
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 6,498 / #40 / 0.379% |
| 2023 | 6,606 / #42 / 0.387% |
| 2022 | 6,745 / #41 / 0.387% |
| 2021 | 6,982 / #40 / 0.399% |
| 2020 | 7,149 / #39 / 0.414% |
| 2019 | 8,228 / #34 / 0.459% |
| 2018 | 8,502 / #34 / 0.468% |
| 2017 | 8,891 / #32 / 0.481% |
| 2016 | 9,774 / #31 / 0.515% |
| 2015 | 9,986 / #31 / 0.521% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 9,994 / #31 / 0.520% |
| 2013 | 10,133 / #28 / 0.536% |
| 2012 | 10,062 / #30 / 0.531% |
| 2011 | 9,606 / #35 / 0.506% |
| 2010 | 9,371 / #39 / 0.488% |
| 2009 | 9,567 / #40 / 0.482% |
| 2008 | 10,029 / #37 / 0.492% |
| 2007 | 10,274 / #41 / 0.495% |
| 2006 | 9,684 / #48 / 0.471% |
| 2005 | 9,127 / #49 / 0.457% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 9,181 / #46 / 0.463% |
| 2003 | 8,943 / #48 / 0.453% |
| 2002 | 8,311 / #48 / 0.428% |
| 2001 | 8,200 / #47 / 0.422% |
| 2000 | 7,439 / #53 / 0.379% |
| 1999 | 6,407 / #64 / 0.334% |
| 1998 | 5,859 / #65 / 0.307% |
| 1997 | 5,145 / #73 / 0.273% |
| 1996 | 4,565 / #86 / 0.241% |
| 1995 | 3,881 / #98 / 0.204% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 3,495 / #103 / 0.181% |
| 1993 | 3,214 / #110 / 0.164% |
| 1992 | 2,773 / #124 / 0.139% |
| 1991 | 2,500 / #130 / 0.124% |
| 1990 | 2,429 / #132 / 0.118% |
| 1989 | 2,210 / #137 / 0.110% |
| 1988 | 1,964 / #143 / 0.103% |
| 1987 | 1,828 / #151 / 0.098% |
| 1986 | 1,737 / #155 / 0.094% |
| 1985 | 1,673 / #165 / 0.091% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,692 / #160 / 0.094% |
| 1983 | 1,796 / #151 / 0.100% |
| 1982 | 1,841 / #151 / 0.101% |
| 1981 | 1,836 / #150 / 0.102% |
| 1980 | 1,798 / #150 / 0.101% |
| 1979 | 1,734 / #151 / 0.101% |
| 1978 | 1,451 / #167 / 0.088% |
| 1977 | 1,264 / #184 / 0.077% |
| 1976 | 1,093 / #202 / 0.070% |
| 1975 | 1,014 / #213 / 0.065% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 941 / #224 / 0.060% |
| 1973 | 896 / #235 / 0.057% |
| 1972 | 806 / #251 / 0.050% |
| 1971 | 713 / #288 / 0.040% |
| 1970 | 569 / #333 / 0.031% |
| 1969 | 515 / #349 / 0.029% |
| 1968 | 427 / #375 / 0.025% |
| 1967 | 395 / #377 / 0.023% |
| 1966 | 429 / #364 / 0.024% |
| 1965 | 428 / #375 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 496 / #352 / 0.025% |
| 1963 | 472 / #359 / 0.023% |
| 1962 | 482 / #363 / 0.023% |
| 1961 | 494 / #357 / 0.023% |
| 1960 | 468 / #363 / 0.022% |
| 1959 | 513 / #342 / 0.024% |
| 1958 | 540 / #332 / 0.025% |
| 1957 | 521 / #334 / 0.024% |
| 1956 | 552 / #317 / 0.026% |
| 1955 | 545 / #315 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 585 / #295 / 0.029% |
| 1953 | 548 / #301 / 0.028% |
| 1952 | 564 / #294 / 0.029% |
| 1951 | 554 / #292 / 0.029% |
| 1950 | 557 / #282 / 0.031% |
| 1949 | 599 / #270 / 0.034% |
| 1948 | 533 / #298 / 0.030% |
| 1947 | 599 / #280 / 0.033% |
| 1946 | 514 / #285 / 0.032% |
| 1945 | 460 / #281 / 0.034% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 491 / #269 / 0.036% |
| 1943 | 481 / #279 / 0.034% |
| 1942 | 450 / #283 / 0.033% |
| 1941 | 451 / #265 / 0.037% |
| 1940 | 487 / #246 / 0.042% |
| 1939 | 463 / #249 / 0.042% |
| 1938 | 460 / #253 / 0.041% |
| 1937 | 447 / #255 / 0.042% |
| 1936 | 423 / #261 / 0.041% |
| 1935 | 476 / #241 / 0.046% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 481 / #237 / 0.047% |
| 1933 | 480 / #237 / 0.048% |
| 1932 | 492 / #240 / 0.047% |
| 1931 | 443 / #256 / 0.043% |
| 1930 | 548 / #231 / 0.050% |
| 1929 | 585 / #218 / 0.054% |
| 1928 | 534 / #241 / 0.048% |
| 1927 | 693 / #203 / 0.061% |
| 1926 | 586 / #229 / 0.053% |
| 1925 | 678 / #206 / 0.061% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 704 / #199 / 0.062% |
| 1923 | 698 / #197 / 0.064% |
| 1922 | 720 / #190 / 0.066% |
| 1921 | 648 / #208 / 0.059% |
| 1920 | 706 / #191 / 0.066% |
| 1919 | 737 / #178 / 0.075% |
| 1918 | 658 / #194 / 0.065% |
| 1917 | 622 / #192 / 0.067% |
| 1916 | 629 / #186 / 0.071% |
| 1915 | 568 / #196 / 0.067% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 496 / #177 / 0.076% |
| 1913 | 398 / #172 / 0.078% |
| 1912 | 359 / #162 / 0.084% |
| 1911 | 233 / #143 / 0.103% |
| 1910 | 252 / #130 / 0.130% |
| 1909 | 209 / #128 / 0.127% |
| 1908 | 162 / #145 / 0.105% |
| 1907 | 178 / #134 / 0.121% |
| 1906 | 163 / #128 / 0.122% |
| 1905 | 147 / #145 / 0.111% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 167 / #126 / 0.130% |
| 1903 | 138 / #138 / 0.116% |
| 1902 | 143 / #135 / 0.117% |
| 1901 | 133 / #125 / 0.125% |
| 1900 | 198 / #116 / 0.132% |
| 1899 | 139 / #119 / 0.131% |
| 1898 | 156 / #117 / 0.127% |
| 1897 | 175 / #101 / 0.155% |
| 1896 | 191 / #100 / 0.160% |
| 1895 | 172 / #107 / 0.147% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 170 / #105 / 0.147% |
| 1893 | 182 / #97 / 0.162% |
| 1892 | 203 / #94 / 0.166% |
| 1891 | 160 / #101 / 0.158% |
| 1890 | 187 / #92 / 0.168% |
| 1889 | 188 / #91 / 0.170% |
| 1888 | 221 / #85 / 0.183% |
| 1887 | 194 / #84 / 0.191% |
| 1886 | 224 / #80 / 0.202% |
| 1885 | 204 / #79 / 0.189% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 243 / #75 / 0.212% |
| 1883 | 227 / #70 / 0.217% |
| 1882 | 278 / #65 / 0.245% |
| 1881 | 258 / #64 / 0.256% |
| 1880 | 274 / #62 / 0.248% |