Total babies named Isiah (all years): 24,598
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 148 / #1310 / 0.009% |
| 2023 | 132 / #1397 / 0.008% |
| 2022 | 141 / #1331 / 0.008% |
| 2021 | 137 / #1351 / 0.008% |
| 2020 | 131 / #1356 / 0.008% |
| 2019 | 157 / #1214 / 0.009% |
| 2018 | 169 / #1139 / 0.009% |
| 2017 | 170 / #1127 / 0.009% |
| 2016 | 197 / #1020 / 0.010% |
| 2015 | 178 / #1094 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 187 / #1060 / 0.010% |
| 2013 | 266 / #816 / 0.014% |
| 2012 | 293 / #776 / 0.015% |
| 2011 | 366 / #639 / 0.019% |
| 2010 | 424 / #589 / 0.022% |
| 2009 | 497 / #535 / 0.025% |
| 2008 | 635 / #443 / 0.031% |
| 2007 | 627 / #446 / 0.030% |
| 2006 | 730 / #405 / 0.036% |
| 2005 | 742 / #387 / 0.037% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 712 / #383 / 0.036% |
| 2003 | 734 / #364 / 0.037% |
| 2002 | 746 / #357 / 0.038% |
| 2001 | 822 / #336 / 0.042% |
| 2000 | 797 / #343 / 0.041% |
| 1999 | 781 / #341 / 0.041% |
| 1998 | 768 / #348 / 0.040% |
| 1997 | 741 / #346 / 0.039% |
| 1996 | 658 / #365 / 0.035% |
| 1995 | 488 / #463 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 360 / #540 / 0.019% |
| 1993 | 323 / #569 / 0.016% |
| 1992 | 392 / #513 / 0.020% |
| 1991 | 449 / #467 / 0.022% |
| 1990 | 511 / #433 / 0.025% |
| 1989 | 409 / #465 / 0.020% |
| 1988 | 302 / #526 / 0.016% |
| 1987 | 205 / #640 / 0.011% |
| 1986 | 107 / #878 / 0.006% |
| 1985 | 130 / #779 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 120 / #799 / 0.007% |
| 1983 | 104 / #860 / 0.006% |
| 1982 | 114 / #831 / 0.006% |
| 1981 | 98 / #903 / 0.005% |
| 1980 | 64 / #1142 / 0.004% |
| 1979 | 59 / #1183 / 0.003% |
| 1978 | 61 / #1125 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 57 / #1165 / 0.003% |
| 1976 | 57 / #1132 / 0.004% |
| 1975 | 59 / #1095 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 51 / #1158 / 0.003% |
| 1973 | 53 / #1131 / 0.003% |
| 1972 | 52 / #1133 / 0.003% |
| 1971 | 47 / #1206 / 0.003% |
| 1970 | 45 / #1244 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 56 / #1034 / 0.003% |
| 1968 | 64 / #904 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 77 / #820 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 70 / #872 / 0.004% |
| 1965 | 52 / #1026 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 90 / #793 / 0.005% |
| 1963 | 65 / #933 / 0.003% |
| 1962 | 72 / #898 / 0.003% |
| 1961 | 77 / #871 / 0.004% |
| 1960 | 64 / #948 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 101 / #759 / 0.005% |
| 1958 | 105 / #728 / 0.005% |
| 1957 | 100 / #754 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 87 / #800 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 109 / #701 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 100 / #724 / 0.005% |
| 1953 | 99 / #718 / 0.005% |
| 1952 | 109 / #665 / 0.006% |
| 1951 | 102 / #694 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 97 / #698 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 114 / #640 / 0.006% |
| 1948 | 125 / #609 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 113 / #649 / 0.006% |
| 1946 | 117 / #596 / 0.007% |
| 1945 | 84 / #659 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 118 / #561 / 0.009% |
| 1943 | 105 / #615 / 0.007% |
| 1942 | 98 / #642 / 0.007% |
| 1941 | 99 / #599 / 0.008% |
| 1940 | 83 / #668 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 102 / #568 / 0.009% |
| 1938 | 95 / #610 / 0.009% |
| 1937 | 85 / #644 / 0.008% |
| 1936 | 100 / #579 / 0.010% |
| 1935 | 88 / #627 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 79 / #687 / 0.008% |
| 1933 | 96 / #595 / 0.010% |
| 1932 | 108 / #572 / 0.010% |
| 1931 | 108 / #566 / 0.010% |
| 1930 | 103 / #602 / 0.009% |
| 1929 | 123 / #525 / 0.011% |
| 1928 | 121 / #556 / 0.011% |
| 1927 | 110 / #591 / 0.010% |
| 1926 | 130 / #536 / 0.012% |
| 1925 | 129 / #541 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 138 / #541 / 0.012% |
| 1923 | 140 / #514 / 0.013% |
| 1922 | 138 / #534 / 0.013% |
| 1921 | 118 / #584 / 0.011% |
| 1920 | 123 / #555 / 0.012% |
| 1919 | 145 / #495 / 0.015% |
| 1918 | 130 / #532 / 0.013% |
| 1917 | 98 / #600 / 0.011% |
| 1916 | 81 / #654 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 96 / #581 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 101 / #483 / 0.015% |
| 1913 | 56 / #588 / 0.011% |
| 1912 | 79 / #441 / 0.018% |
| 1911 | 52 / #398 / 0.023% |
| 1910 | 56 / #330 / 0.029% |
| 1909 | 48 / #337 / 0.029% |
| 1908 | 39 / #370 / 0.025% |
| 1907 | 39 / #355 / 0.027% |
| 1906 | 29 / #403 / 0.022% |
| 1905 | 35 / #349 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 28 / #397 / 0.022% |
| 1903 | 31 / #348 / 0.026% |
| 1902 | 28 / #375 / 0.023% |
| 1901 | 19 / #445 / 0.018% |
| 1900 | 44 / #321 / 0.029% |
| 1899 | 21 / #408 / 0.020% |
| 1898 | 29 / #361 / 0.024% |
| 1897 | 27 / #363 / 0.024% |
| 1896 | 31 / #345 / 0.026% |
| 1895 | 35 / #305 / 0.030% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 43 / #268 / 0.037% |
| 1893 | 31 / #314 / 0.028% |
| 1892 | 37 / #307 / 0.030% |
| 1891 | 27 / #329 / 0.027% |
| 1890 | 32 / #306 / 0.029% |
| 1889 | 16 / #474 / 0.014% |
| 1888 | 35 / #305 / 0.029% |
| 1887 | 32 / #295 / 0.032% |
| 1886 | 22 / #374 / 0.020% |
| 1885 | 26 / #335 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 24 / #365 / 0.021% |
| 1883 | 24 / #343 / 0.023% |
| 1882 | 28 / #325 / 0.025% |
| 1881 | 24 / #338 / 0.024% |
| 1880 | 20 / #385 / 0.018% |