Total babies named Jake (all years): 128,856
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 743 / #422 / 0.043% |
| 2023 | 782 / #408 / 0.046% |
| 2022 | 790 / #405 / 0.045% |
| 2021 | 969 / #337 / 0.055% |
| 2020 | 1,035 / #320 / 0.060% |
| 2019 | 1,175 / #294 / 0.066% |
| 2018 | 1,379 / #263 / 0.076% |
| 2017 | 1,503 / #249 / 0.081% |
| 2016 | 1,586 / #242 / 0.084% |
| 2015 | 1,922 / #207 / 0.100% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,171 / #190 / 0.113% |
| 2013 | 2,449 / #166 / 0.129% |
| 2012 | 2,679 / #153 / 0.141% |
| 2011 | 3,110 / #129 / 0.164% |
| 2010 | 3,440 / #115 / 0.179% |
| 2009 | 3,386 / #125 / 0.171% |
| 2008 | 3,795 / #111 / 0.186% |
| 2007 | 3,882 / #112 / 0.187% |
| 2006 | 4,028 / #108 / 0.196% |
| 2005 | 4,153 / #103 / 0.208% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 4,471 / #98 / 0.225% |
| 2003 | 4,405 / #98 / 0.223% |
| 2002 | 3,792 / #102 / 0.195% |
| 2001 | 3,838 / #100 / 0.198% |
| 2000 | 4,091 / #96 / 0.208% |
| 1999 | 3,936 / #97 / 0.205% |
| 1998 | 3,788 / #102 / 0.198% |
| 1997 | 3,840 / #101 / 0.204% |
| 1996 | 3,449 / #114 / 0.182% |
| 1995 | 3,510 / #108 / 0.184% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 3,468 / #106 / 0.180% |
| 1993 | 3,196 / #111 / 0.163% |
| 1992 | 2,928 / #119 / 0.147% |
| 1991 | 2,774 / #119 / 0.137% |
| 1990 | 2,227 / #140 / 0.108% |
| 1989 | 1,965 / #152 / 0.098% |
| 1988 | 1,707 / #165 / 0.089% |
| 1987 | 1,639 / #166 / 0.088% |
| 1986 | 1,553 / #171 / 0.084% |
| 1985 | 1,071 / #221 / 0.058% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 748 / #278 / 0.041% |
| 1983 | 772 / #269 / 0.043% |
| 1982 | 671 / #299 / 0.037% |
| 1981 | 593 / #324 / 0.033% |
| 1980 | 568 / #332 / 0.032% |
| 1979 | 495 / #356 / 0.029% |
| 1978 | 449 / #362 / 0.027% |
| 1977 | 445 / #368 / 0.027% |
| 1976 | 429 / #370 / 0.027% |
| 1975 | 334 / #429 / 0.021% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 309 / #456 / 0.020% |
| 1973 | 314 / #441 / 0.020% |
| 1972 | 266 / #480 / 0.016% |
| 1971 | 177 / #623 / 0.010% |
| 1970 | 153 / #662 / 0.008% |
| 1969 | 138 / #673 / 0.008% |
| 1968 | 124 / #677 / 0.007% |
| 1967 | 104 / #727 / 0.006% |
| 1966 | 121 / #675 / 0.007% |
| 1965 | 144 / #632 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 134 / #666 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 154 / #631 / 0.008% |
| 1962 | 147 / #639 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 165 / #619 / 0.008% |
| 1960 | 156 / #625 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 147 / #638 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 157 / #614 / 0.007% |
| 1957 | 154 / #620 / 0.007% |
| 1956 | 137 / #649 / 0.006% |
| 1955 | 141 / #626 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 169 / #564 / 0.008% |
| 1953 | 163 / #555 / 0.008% |
| 1952 | 174 / #533 / 0.009% |
| 1951 | 179 / #507 / 0.010% |
| 1950 | 192 / #485 / 0.011% |
| 1949 | 185 / #488 / 0.010% |
| 1948 | 174 / #498 / 0.010% |
| 1947 | 187 / #494 / 0.010% |
| 1946 | 193 / #457 / 0.012% |
| 1945 | 165 / #463 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 172 / #465 / 0.013% |
| 1943 | 159 / #492 / 0.011% |
| 1942 | 198 / #441 / 0.014% |
| 1941 | 190 / #426 / 0.015% |
| 1940 | 177 / #435 / 0.015% |
| 1939 | 184 / #419 / 0.017% |
| 1938 | 183 / #422 / 0.017% |
| 1937 | 172 / #432 / 0.016% |
| 1936 | 194 / #392 / 0.019% |
| 1935 | 179 / #411 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 192 / #398 / 0.019% |
| 1933 | 199 / #384 / 0.020% |
| 1932 | 205 / #392 / 0.020% |
| 1931 | 214 / #384 / 0.021% |
| 1930 | 221 / #382 / 0.020% |
| 1929 | 245 / #362 / 0.023% |
| 1928 | 243 / #374 / 0.022% |
| 1927 | 272 / #355 / 0.024% |
| 1926 | 266 / #358 / 0.024% |
| 1925 | 306 / #330 / 0.027% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 306 / #333 / 0.027% |
| 1923 | 330 / #318 / 0.030% |
| 1922 | 332 / #314 / 0.031% |
| 1921 | 360 / #300 / 0.033% |
| 1920 | 362 / #296 / 0.034% |
| 1919 | 334 / #295 / 0.034% |
| 1918 | 377 / #274 / 0.037% |
| 1917 | 299 / #306 / 0.032% |
| 1916 | 362 / #262 / 0.041% |
| 1915 | 355 / #254 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 274 / #261 / 0.042% |
| 1913 | 227 / #250 / 0.044% |
| 1912 | 187 / #258 / 0.043% |
| 1911 | 110 / #244 / 0.049% |
| 1910 | 148 / #184 / 0.076% |
| 1909 | 109 / #199 / 0.066% |
| 1908 | 115 / #185 / 0.075% |
| 1907 | 117 / #185 / 0.080% |
| 1906 | 83 / #215 / 0.062% |
| 1905 | 92 / #193 / 0.070% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 78 / #207 / 0.061% |
| 1903 | 93 / #177 / 0.078% |
| 1902 | 102 / #171 / 0.083% |
| 1901 | 79 / #185 / 0.074% |
| 1900 | 121 / #172 / 0.080% |
| 1899 | 76 / #184 / 0.072% |
| 1898 | 117 / #145 / 0.095% |
| 1897 | 102 / #155 / 0.090% |
| 1896 | 88 / #185 / 0.074% |
| 1895 | 91 / #172 / 0.078% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 86 / #177 / 0.074% |
| 1893 | 66 / #210 / 0.059% |
| 1892 | 116 / #140 / 0.095% |
| 1891 | 78 / #164 / 0.077% |
| 1890 | 72 / #188 / 0.065% |
| 1889 | 107 / #135 / 0.097% |
| 1888 | 107 / #144 / 0.089% |
| 1887 | 90 / #142 / 0.089% |
| 1886 | 95 / #147 / 0.086% |
| 1885 | 100 / #135 / 0.093% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 92 / #148 / 0.080% |
| 1883 | 96 / #129 / 0.092% |
| 1882 | 97 / #142 / 0.085% |
| 1881 | 92 / #134 / 0.091% |
| 1880 | 96 / #141 / 0.087% |