Total babies named James (all years): 5,262,396
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 11,793 / #5 / 0.688% |
| 2023 | 11,727 / #4 / 0.686% |
| 2022 | 12,109 / #4 / 0.694% |
| 2021 | 12,464 / #5 / 0.713% |
| 2020 | 12,381 / #6 / 0.718% |
| 2019 | 13,193 / #6 / 0.736% |
| 2018 | 13,642 / #4 / 0.751% |
| 2017 | 14,357 / #4 / 0.776% |
| 2016 | 14,916 / #5 / 0.786% |
| 2015 | 14,861 / #7 / 0.776% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 14,462 / #9 / 0.753% |
| 2013 | 13,595 / #13 / 0.719% |
| 2012 | 13,456 / #14 / 0.709% |
| 2011 | 13,272 / #17 / 0.699% |
| 2010 | 13,898 / #19 / 0.724% |
| 2009 | 14,221 / #18 / 0.717% |
| 2008 | 15,188 / #17 / 0.745% |
| 2007 | 15,973 / #15 / 0.770% |
| 2006 | 16,254 / #16 / 0.791% |
| 2005 | 16,140 / #17 / 0.808% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 16,469 / #17 / 0.830% |
| 2003 | 16,895 / #18 / 0.855% |
| 2002 | 16,968 / #18 / 0.874% |
| 2001 | 17,073 / #19 / 0.879% |
| 2000 | 17,991 / #18 / 0.916% |
| 1999 | 18,555 / #19 / 0.966% |
| 1998 | 19,689 / #18 / 1.030% |
| 1997 | 20,407 / #17 / 1.083% |
| 1996 | 21,164 / #17 / 1.117% |
| 1995 | 22,736 / #17 / 1.194% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 24,777 / #14 / 1.283% |
| 1993 | 26,255 / #14 / 1.339% |
| 1992 | 28,509 / #9 / 1.427% |
| 1991 | 30,513 / #7 / 1.510% |
| 1990 | 32,357 / #8 / 1.575% |
| 1989 | 32,720 / #9 / 1.635% |
| 1988 | 32,521 / #9 / 1.699% |
| 1987 | 32,660 / #8 / 1.749% |
| 1986 | 34,055 / #7 / 1.849% |
| 1985 | 35,864 / #7 / 1.940% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 35,856 / #7 / 1.987% |
| 1983 | 36,344 / #6 / 2.027% |
| 1982 | 38,875 / #6 / 2.142% |
| 1981 | 38,289 / #7 / 2.137% |
| 1980 | 39,314 / #5 / 2.204% |
| 1979 | 39,351 / #5 / 2.286% |
| 1978 | 39,902 / #5 / 2.430% |
| 1977 | 40,043 / #5 / 2.437% |
| 1976 | 38,298 / #5 / 2.441% |
| 1975 | 39,574 / #4 / 2.534% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 41,336 / #5 / 2.629% |
| 1973 | 42,838 / #4 / 2.748% |
| 1972 | 47,064 / #3 / 2.902% |
| 1971 | 54,603 / #2 / 3.088% |
| 1970 | 61,740 / #2 / 3.322% |
| 1969 | 59,894 / #3 / 3.349% |
| 1968 | 60,666 / #4 / 3.490% |
| 1967 | 61,688 / #3 / 3.537% |
| 1966 | 65,163 / #3 / 3.654% |
| 1965 | 67,674 / #4 / 3.638% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 73,021 / #4 / 3.664% |
| 1963 | 71,291 / #4 / 3.510% |
| 1962 | 72,561 / #4 / 3.508% |
| 1961 | 75,959 / #4 / 3.576% |
| 1960 | 76,804 / #3 / 3.603% |
| 1959 | 78,644 / #3 / 3.684% |
| 1958 | 78,773 / #3 / 3.712% |
| 1957 | 84,343 / #2 / 3.910% |
| 1956 | 84,903 / #2 / 4.014% |
| 1955 | 84,184 / #3 / 4.087% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 86,312 / #3 / 4.233% |
| 1953 | 86,071 / #2 / 4.364% |
| 1952 | 87,066 / #1 / 4.479% |
| 1951 | 87,257 / #1 / 4.634% |
| 1950 | 86,223 / #1 / 4.816% |
| 1949 | 86,859 / #1 / 4.896% |
| 1948 | 88,604 / #1 / 5.050% |
| 1947 | 94,763 / #1 / 5.180% |
| 1946 | 87,436 / #1 / 5.384% |
| 1945 | 74,466 / #1 / 5.533% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 76,951 / #1 / 5.646% |
| 1943 | 80,275 / #1 / 5.624% |
| 1942 | 77,180 / #1 / 5.588% |
| 1941 | 66,752 / #1 / 5.435% |
| 1940 | 62,481 / #1 / 5.390% |
| 1939 | 59,636 / #2 / 5.388% |
| 1938 | 59,102 / #2 / 5.329% |
| 1937 | 56,562 / #2 / 5.303% |
| 1936 | 54,696 / #2 / 5.273% |
| 1935 | 55,002 / #2 / 5.282% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 54,269 / #2 / 5.256% |
| 1933 | 51,110 / #2 / 5.155% |
| 1932 | 51,931 / #2 / 4.974% |
| 1931 | 51,213 / #2 / 4.926% |
| 1930 | 53,957 / #2 / 4.917% |
| 1929 | 52,133 / #2 / 4.847% |
| 1928 | 52,753 / #3 / 4.763% |
| 1927 | 53,675 / #3 / 4.763% |
| 1926 | 53,197 / #3 / 4.790% |
| 1925 | 52,679 / #4 / 4.721% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 52,941 / #4 / 4.674% |
| 1923 | 50,463 / #4 / 4.604% |
| 1922 | 49,803 / #4 / 4.577% |
| 1921 | 49,750 / #4 / 4.517% |
| 1920 | 47,908 / #4 / 4.501% |
| 1919 | 42,392 / #3 / 4.325% |
| 1918 | 42,115 / #3 / 4.155% |
| 1917 | 37,338 / #3 / 4.034% |
| 1916 | 35,568 / #3 / 3.996% |
| 1915 | 33,773 / #3 / 3.980% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 26,262 / #3 / 4.011% |
| 1913 | 20,832 / #3 / 4.064% |
| 1912 | 17,644 / #3 / 4.104% |
| 1911 | 9,952 / #3 / 4.404% |
| 1910 | 9,194 / #2 / 4.734% |
| 1909 | 7,595 / #3 / 4.631% |
| 1908 | 7,012 / #3 / 4.543% |
| 1907 | 6,707 / #3 / 4.568% |
| 1906 | 5,908 / #3 / 4.437% |
| 1905 | 6,042 / #3 / 4.567% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 5,855 / #3 / 4.570% |
| 1903 | 5,479 / #3 / 4.595% |
| 1902 | 5,592 / #3 / 4.559% |
| 1901 | 4,735 / #3 / 4.447% |
| 1900 | 7,245 / #3 / 4.815% |
| 1899 | 4,597 / #3 / 4.328% |
| 1898 | 5,321 / #3 / 4.337% |
| 1897 | 5,113 / #3 / 4.535% |
| 1896 | 5,206 / #3 / 4.354% |
| 1895 | 5,335 / #3 / 4.545% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 5,110 / #3 / 4.414% |
| 1893 | 5,030 / #3 / 4.478% |
| 1892 | 5,398 / #3 / 4.423% |
| 1891 | 4,516 / #3 / 4.463% |
| 1890 | 5,097 / #3 / 4.591% |
| 1889 | 5,020 / #3 / 4.540% |
| 1888 | 5,562 / #3 / 4.602% |
| 1887 | 4,768 / #3 / 4.702% |
| 1886 | 5,355 / #3 / 4.834% |
| 1885 | 5,175 / #3 / 4.801% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 5,693 / #3 / 4.975% |
| 1883 | 5,223 / #3 / 4.992% |
| 1882 | 5,892 / #3 / 5.183% |
| 1881 | 5,441 / #3 / 5.401% |
| 1880 | 5,927 / #3 / 5.364% |