Total babies named Janie (all years): 75,704
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 138 / #1541 / 0.009% |
| 2023 | 138 / #1545 / 0.009% |
| 2022 | 151 / #1465 / 0.009% |
| 2021 | 128 / #1632 / 0.008% |
| 2020 | 111 / #1785 / 0.007% |
| 2019 | 141 / #1533 / 0.008% |
| 2018 | 124 / #1679 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 132 / #1639 / 0.008% |
| 2016 | 158 / #1458 / 0.009% |
| 2015 | 170 / #1389 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 165 / #1394 / 0.009% |
| 2013 | 148 / #1499 / 0.008% |
| 2012 | 163 / #1411 / 0.009% |
| 2011 | 138 / #1580 / 0.008% |
| 2010 | 155 / #1460 / 0.009% |
| 2009 | 203 / #1229 / 0.011% |
| 2008 | 201 / #1253 / 0.011% |
| 2007 | 170 / #1403 / 0.009% |
| 2006 | 186 / #1284 / 0.010% |
| 2005 | 226 / #1056 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 223 / #1039 / 0.012% |
| 2003 | 195 / #1126 / 0.011% |
| 2002 | 236 / #946 / 0.013% |
| 2001 | 214 / #1004 / 0.012% |
| 2000 | 208 / #1017 / 0.011% |
| 1999 | 207 / #992 / 0.012% |
| 1998 | 210 / #971 / 0.012% |
| 1997 | 238 / #859 / 0.014% |
| 1996 | 231 / #862 / 0.013% |
| 1995 | 248 / #801 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 285 / #732 / 0.016% |
| 1993 | 270 / #763 / 0.015% |
| 1992 | 304 / #710 / 0.016% |
| 1991 | 321 / #673 / 0.017% |
| 1990 | 323 / #667 / 0.017% |
| 1989 | 294 / #690 / 0.016% |
| 1988 | 317 / #626 / 0.018% |
| 1987 | 268 / #690 / 0.015% |
| 1986 | 297 / #626 / 0.017% |
| 1985 | 299 / #626 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 306 / #589 / 0.018% |
| 1983 | 309 / #580 / 0.019% |
| 1982 | 335 / #550 / 0.020% |
| 1981 | 338 / #552 / 0.020% |
| 1980 | 316 / #583 / 0.019% |
| 1979 | 330 / #558 / 0.021% |
| 1978 | 303 / #569 / 0.020% |
| 1977 | 353 / #521 / 0.023% |
| 1976 | 360 / #498 / 0.025% |
| 1975 | 351 / #510 / 0.024% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 354 / #497 / 0.024% |
| 1973 | 389 / #468 / 0.027% |
| 1972 | 441 / #435 / 0.029% |
| 1971 | 454 / #454 / 0.027% |
| 1970 | 475 / #456 / 0.027% |
| 1969 | 498 / #432 / 0.030% |
| 1968 | 490 / #429 / 0.030% |
| 1967 | 554 / #390 / 0.034% |
| 1966 | 595 / #373 / 0.035% |
| 1965 | 620 / #365 / 0.035% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 752 / #347 / 0.040% |
| 1963 | 940 / #301 / 0.049% |
| 1962 | 951 / #299 / 0.048% |
| 1961 | 1,048 / #284 / 0.052% |
| 1960 | 1,084 / #273 / 0.054% |
| 1959 | 1,128 / #262 / 0.056% |
| 1958 | 1,215 / #246 / 0.060% |
| 1957 | 1,304 / #235 / 0.064% |
| 1956 | 1,410 / #215 / 0.070% |
| 1955 | 1,483 / #209 / 0.076% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,492 / #205 / 0.077% |
| 1953 | 1,578 / #197 / 0.084% |
| 1952 | 1,569 / #189 / 0.085% |
| 1951 | 1,707 / #176 / 0.095% |
| 1950 | 1,729 / #164 / 0.101% |
| 1949 | 1,737 / #165 / 0.102% |
| 1948 | 1,579 / #176 / 0.093% |
| 1947 | 1,845 / #161 / 0.104% |
| 1946 | 1,704 / #158 / 0.108% |
| 1945 | 1,469 / #159 / 0.112% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,163 / #186 / 0.088% |
| 1943 | 1,065 / #198 / 0.076% |
| 1942 | 949 / #212 / 0.070% |
| 1941 | 797 / #217 / 0.066% |
| 1940 | 811 / #213 / 0.071% |
| 1939 | 758 / #222 / 0.069% |
| 1938 | 778 / #218 / 0.071% |
| 1937 | 706 / #230 / 0.066% |
| 1936 | 754 / #216 / 0.072% |
| 1935 | 744 / #227 / 0.071% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 771 / #223 / 0.074% |
| 1933 | 710 / #229 / 0.070% |
| 1932 | 704 / #229 / 0.066% |
| 1931 | 696 / #230 / 0.065% |
| 1930 | 707 / #229 / 0.063% |
| 1929 | 707 / #225 / 0.063% |
| 1928 | 709 / #234 / 0.061% |
| 1927 | 729 / #240 / 0.061% |
| 1926 | 664 / #256 / 0.056% |
| 1925 | 741 / #242 / 0.061% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 751 / #243 / 0.060% |
| 1923 | 699 / #246 / 0.058% |
| 1922 | 684 / #250 / 0.057% |
| 1921 | 708 / #250 / 0.057% |
| 1920 | 764 / #235 / 0.064% |
| 1919 | 751 / #226 / 0.066% |
| 1918 | 656 / #251 / 0.057% |
| 1917 | 634 / #246 / 0.059% |
| 1916 | 649 / #244 / 0.062% |
| 1915 | 571 / #247 / 0.058% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 472 / #245 / 0.062% |
| 1913 | 471 / #219 / 0.075% |
| 1912 | 416 / #221 / 0.075% |
| 1911 | 317 / #224 / 0.076% |
| 1910 | 377 / #182 / 0.095% |
| 1909 | 301 / #193 / 0.087% |
| 1908 | 284 / #196 / 0.085% |
| 1907 | 295 / #185 / 0.093% |
| 1906 | 265 / #187 / 0.090% |
| 1905 | 306 / #171 / 0.105% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 272 / #179 / 0.099% |
| 1903 | 260 / #179 / 0.099% |
| 1902 | 262 / #176 / 0.099% |
| 1901 | 278 / #163 / 0.116% |
| 1900 | 330 / #167 / 0.110% |
| 1899 | 224 / #186 / 0.096% |
| 1898 | 235 / #191 / 0.091% |
| 1897 | 247 / #174 / 0.105% |
| 1896 | 223 / #184 / 0.094% |
| 1895 | 220 / #180 / 0.094% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 246 / #165 / 0.110% |
| 1893 | 211 / #175 / 0.099% |
| 1892 | 242 / #159 / 0.114% |
| 1891 | 204 / #164 / 0.110% |
| 1890 | 220 / #162 / 0.116% |
| 1889 | 226 / #148 / 0.127% |
| 1888 | 206 / #154 / 0.115% |
| 1887 | 155 / #158 / 0.106% |
| 1886 | 149 / #158 / 0.103% |
| 1885 | 155 / #147 / 0.116% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 122 / #160 / 0.095% |
| 1883 | 135 / #144 / 0.120% |
| 1882 | 134 / #134 / 0.124% |
| 1881 | 113 / #139 / 0.123% |
| 1880 | 96 / #146 / 0.106% |