Total babies named Jay (all years): 197,300
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 819 / #396 / 0.048% |
| 2023 | 835 / #381 / 0.049% |
| 2022 | 897 / #367 / 0.051% |
| 2021 | 864 / #376 / 0.049% |
| 2020 | 807 / #381 / 0.047% |
| 2019 | 847 / #374 / 0.047% |
| 2018 | 799 / #398 / 0.044% |
| 2017 | 859 / #382 / 0.046% |
| 2016 | 815 / #394 / 0.043% |
| 2015 | 806 / #393 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 849 / #371 / 0.044% |
| 2013 | 767 / #389 / 0.041% |
| 2012 | 772 / #386 / 0.041% |
| 2011 | 718 / #397 / 0.038% |
| 2010 | 686 / #410 / 0.036% |
| 2009 | 719 / #408 / 0.036% |
| 2008 | 763 / #394 / 0.037% |
| 2007 | 752 / #396 / 0.036% |
| 2006 | 867 / #350 / 0.042% |
| 2005 | 852 / #348 / 0.043% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 822 / #347 / 0.041% |
| 2003 | 810 / #345 / 0.041% |
| 2002 | 825 / #334 / 0.042% |
| 2001 | 888 / #313 / 0.046% |
| 2000 | 869 / #326 / 0.044% |
| 1999 | 854 / #327 / 0.044% |
| 1998 | 833 / #326 / 0.044% |
| 1997 | 946 / #292 / 0.050% |
| 1996 | 942 / #287 / 0.050% |
| 1995 | 1,011 / #275 / 0.053% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 1,101 / #262 / 0.057% |
| 1993 | 1,105 / #260 / 0.056% |
| 1992 | 1,219 / #236 / 0.061% |
| 1991 | 1,268 / #234 / 0.063% |
| 1990 | 1,404 / #217 / 0.068% |
| 1989 | 1,442 / #203 / 0.072% |
| 1988 | 1,368 / #199 / 0.071% |
| 1987 | 1,487 / #185 / 0.080% |
| 1986 | 1,483 / #180 / 0.081% |
| 1985 | 1,524 / #175 / 0.082% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 1,555 / #171 / 0.086% |
| 1983 | 1,542 / #169 / 0.086% |
| 1982 | 1,668 / #164 / 0.092% |
| 1981 | 1,787 / #153 / 0.100% |
| 1980 | 1,984 / #141 / 0.111% |
| 1979 | 2,146 / #126 / 0.125% |
| 1978 | 2,151 / #119 / 0.131% |
| 1977 | 2,097 / #130 / 0.128% |
| 1976 | 2,103 / #126 / 0.134% |
| 1975 | 2,174 / #117 / 0.139% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 2,360 / #111 / 0.150% |
| 1973 | 2,215 / #118 / 0.142% |
| 1972 | 2,444 / #115 / 0.151% |
| 1971 | 2,866 / #114 / 0.162% |
| 1970 | 3,416 / #97 / 0.184% |
| 1969 | 3,181 / #95 / 0.178% |
| 1968 | 3,429 / #87 / 0.197% |
| 1967 | 3,612 / #87 / 0.207% |
| 1966 | 3,598 / #91 / 0.202% |
| 1965 | 3,942 / #90 / 0.212% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 4,570 / #84 / 0.229% |
| 1963 | 4,719 / #85 / 0.232% |
| 1962 | 5,158 / #80 / 0.249% |
| 1961 | 5,120 / #81 / 0.241% |
| 1960 | 5,383 / #78 / 0.253% |
| 1959 | 4,940 / #88 / 0.231% |
| 1958 | 5,027 / #86 / 0.237% |
| 1957 | 4,630 / #88 / 0.215% |
| 1956 | 4,119 / #92 / 0.195% |
| 1955 | 3,397 / #103 / 0.165% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 3,372 / #101 / 0.165% |
| 1953 | 3,235 / #99 / 0.164% |
| 1952 | 3,028 / #106 / 0.156% |
| 1951 | 2,637 / #116 / 0.140% |
| 1950 | 2,584 / #115 / 0.144% |
| 1949 | 2,457 / #118 / 0.139% |
| 1948 | 2,272 / #123 / 0.129% |
| 1947 | 2,438 / #119 / 0.133% |
| 1946 | 2,197 / #115 / 0.135% |
| 1945 | 1,760 / #125 / 0.131% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,554 / #136 / 0.114% |
| 1943 | 1,673 / #134 / 0.117% |
| 1942 | 1,598 / #133 / 0.116% |
| 1941 | 1,416 / #137 / 0.115% |
| 1940 | 1,291 / #139 / 0.111% |
| 1939 | 1,146 / #142 / 0.104% |
| 1938 | 1,181 / #138 / 0.106% |
| 1937 | 1,147 / #136 / 0.108% |
| 1936 | 1,102 / #140 / 0.106% |
| 1935 | 1,067 / #147 / 0.102% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 933 / #157 / 0.090% |
| 1933 | 949 / #151 / 0.096% |
| 1932 | 934 / #161 / 0.089% |
| 1931 | 867 / #166 / 0.083% |
| 1930 | 891 / #166 / 0.081% |
| 1929 | 842 / #169 / 0.078% |
| 1928 | 768 / #185 / 0.069% |
| 1927 | 871 / #171 / 0.077% |
| 1926 | 827 / #175 / 0.074% |
| 1925 | 789 / #182 / 0.071% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 854 / #170 / 0.075% |
| 1923 | 829 / #172 / 0.076% |
| 1922 | 780 / #180 / 0.072% |
| 1921 | 828 / #174 / 0.075% |
| 1920 | 666 / #201 / 0.063% |
| 1919 | 637 / #197 / 0.065% |
| 1918 | 706 / #185 / 0.070% |
| 1917 | 643 / #188 / 0.069% |
| 1916 | 640 / #184 / 0.072% |
| 1915 | 537 / #200 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 379 / #213 / 0.058% |
| 1913 | 349 / #193 / 0.068% |
| 1912 | 318 / #184 / 0.074% |
| 1911 | 126 / #229 / 0.056% |
| 1910 | 120 / #213 / 0.062% |
| 1909 | 98 / #219 / 0.060% |
| 1908 | 89 / #218 / 0.058% |
| 1907 | 91 / #210 / 0.062% |
| 1906 | 87 / #204 / 0.065% |
| 1905 | 92 / #194 / 0.070% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 95 / #189 / 0.074% |
| 1903 | 82 / #194 / 0.069% |
| 1902 | 89 / #188 / 0.073% |
| 1901 | 96 / #160 / 0.090% |
| 1900 | 107 / #192 / 0.071% |
| 1899 | 63 / #208 / 0.059% |
| 1898 | 85 / #184 / 0.069% |
| 1897 | 82 / #187 / 0.073% |
| 1896 | 78 / #202 / 0.065% |
| 1895 | 91 / #173 / 0.078% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 96 / #161 / 0.083% |
| 1893 | 105 / #143 / 0.093% |
| 1892 | 111 / #145 / 0.091% |
| 1891 | 99 / #137 / 0.098% |
| 1890 | 108 / #133 / 0.097% |
| 1889 | 104 / #139 / 0.094% |
| 1888 | 122 / #129 / 0.101% |
| 1887 | 106 / #124 / 0.105% |
| 1886 | 107 / #126 / 0.097% |
| 1885 | 91 / #150 / 0.084% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 110 / #130 / 0.096% |
| 1883 | 97 / #128 / 0.093% |
| 1882 | 80 / #170 / 0.070% |
| 1881 | 96 / #123 / 0.095% |
| 1880 | 103 / #127 / 0.093% |