Total babies named Joshua (all years): 1,249,012
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 5,244 / #57 / 0.306% |
| 2023 | 5,064 / #60 / 0.296% |
| 2022 | 5,195 / #60 / 0.298% |
| 2021 | 5,524 / #58 / 0.316% |
| 2020 | 6,011 / #53 / 0.348% |
| 2019 | 6,625 / #48 / 0.369% |
| 2018 | 7,443 / #40 / 0.410% |
| 2017 | 8,344 / #38 / 0.451% |
| 2016 | 9,253 / #35 / 0.488% |
| 2015 | 9,847 / #33 / 0.514% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 10,926 / #25 / 0.569% |
| 2013 | 11,855 / #21 / 0.627% |
| 2012 | 12,677 / #17 / 0.668% |
| 2011 | 13,796 / #14 / 0.726% |
| 2010 | 15,463 / #11 / 0.806% |
| 2009 | 17,668 / #6 / 0.891% |
| 2008 | 19,228 / #4 / 0.943% |
| 2007 | 20,667 / #4 / 0.996% |
| 2006 | 22,334 / #3 / 1.087% |
| 2005 | 23,261 / #3 / 1.165% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 24,213 / #3 / 1.220% |
| 2003 | 25,103 / #3 / 1.271% |
| 2002 | 25,997 / #3 / 1.339% |
| 2001 | 26,024 / #4 / 1.339% |
| 2000 | 27,542 / #4 / 1.402% |
| 1999 | 27,264 / #4 / 1.420% |
| 1998 | 28,095 / #4 / 1.470% |
| 1997 | 28,288 / #5 / 1.501% |
| 1996 | 29,174 / #5 / 1.540% |
| 1995 | 30,720 / #5 / 1.614% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 31,375 / #4 / 1.624% |
| 1993 | 33,589 / #4 / 1.713% |
| 1992 | 36,220 / #4 / 1.813% |
| 1991 | 41,226 / #4 / 2.041% |
| 1990 | 43,233 / #4 / 2.105% |
| 1989 | 44,099 / #4 / 2.204% |
| 1988 | 42,650 / #4 / 2.228% |
| 1987 | 40,004 / #4 / 2.143% |
| 1986 | 37,541 / #4 / 2.039% |
| 1985 | 42,198 / #4 / 2.283% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 40,266 / #4 / 2.231% |
| 1983 | 36,688 / #5 / 2.047% |
| 1982 | 38,003 / #7 / 2.094% |
| 1981 | 39,027 / #6 / 2.179% |
| 1980 | 36,054 / #7 / 2.021% |
| 1979 | 31,125 / #9 / 1.808% |
| 1978 | 25,206 / #12 / 1.535% |
| 1977 | 22,069 / #14 / 1.343% |
| 1976 | 16,846 / #18 / 1.074% |
| 1975 | 14,566 / #26 / 0.933% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 11,599 / #29 / 0.738% |
| 1973 | 8,058 / #42 / 0.517% |
| 1972 | 5,033 / #59 / 0.310% |
| 1971 | 3,649 / #80 / 0.206% |
| 1970 | 2,174 / #150 / 0.117% |
| 1969 | 1,321 / #197 / 0.074% |
| 1968 | 731 / #271 / 0.042% |
| 1967 | 563 / #314 / 0.032% |
| 1966 | 486 / #340 / 0.027% |
| 1965 | 461 / #352 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 389 / #408 / 0.020% |
| 1963 | 372 / #417 / 0.018% |
| 1962 | 335 / #436 / 0.016% |
| 1961 | 354 / #423 / 0.017% |
| 1960 | 314 / #455 / 0.015% |
| 1959 | 327 / #441 / 0.015% |
| 1958 | 276 / #477 / 0.013% |
| 1957 | 273 / #468 / 0.013% |
| 1956 | 239 / #491 / 0.011% |
| 1955 | 245 / #471 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 193 / #524 / 0.009% |
| 1953 | 164 / #552 / 0.008% |
| 1952 | 178 / #526 / 0.009% |
| 1951 | 166 / #530 / 0.009% |
| 1950 | 161 / #537 / 0.009% |
| 1949 | 183 / #491 / 0.010% |
| 1948 | 130 / #585 / 0.007% |
| 1947 | 141 / #570 / 0.008% |
| 1946 | 113 / #608 / 0.007% |
| 1945 | 97 / #615 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 104 / #602 / 0.008% |
| 1943 | 95 / #659 / 0.007% |
| 1942 | 111 / #596 / 0.008% |
| 1941 | 92 / #636 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 90 / #628 / 0.008% |
| 1939 | 101 / #571 / 0.009% |
| 1938 | 71 / #727 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 92 / #608 / 0.009% |
| 1936 | 101 / #575 / 0.010% |
| 1935 | 80 / #666 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 106 / #575 / 0.010% |
| 1933 | 102 / #571 / 0.010% |
| 1932 | 111 / #562 / 0.011% |
| 1931 | 94 / #614 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 90 / #647 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 74 / #731 / 0.007% |
| 1928 | 118 / #563 / 0.011% |
| 1927 | 117 / #572 / 0.010% |
| 1926 | 105 / #613 / 0.009% |
| 1925 | 109 / #606 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 114 / #596 / 0.010% |
| 1923 | 129 / #541 / 0.012% |
| 1922 | 124 / #572 / 0.011% |
| 1921 | 125 / #564 / 0.011% |
| 1920 | 128 / #544 / 0.012% |
| 1919 | 139 / #506 / 0.014% |
| 1918 | 118 / #553 / 0.012% |
| 1917 | 122 / #523 / 0.013% |
| 1916 | 99 / #584 / 0.011% |
| 1915 | 136 / #473 / 0.016% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 87 / #530 / 0.013% |
| 1913 | 78 / #492 / 0.015% |
| 1912 | 60 / #508 / 0.014% |
| 1911 | 43 / #449 / 0.019% |
| 1910 | 44 / #401 / 0.023% |
| 1909 | 28 / #493 / 0.017% |
| 1908 | 29 / #460 / 0.019% |
| 1907 | 26 / #460 / 0.018% |
| 1906 | 27 / #427 / 0.020% |
| 1905 | 18 / #557 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 19 / #502 / 0.015% |
| 1903 | 21 / #459 / 0.018% |
| 1902 | 17 / #530 / 0.014% |
| 1901 | 22 / #400 / 0.021% |
| 1900 | 36 / #371 / 0.024% |
| 1899 | 24 / #380 / 0.023% |
| 1898 | 39 / #299 / 0.032% |
| 1897 | 29 / #348 / 0.026% |
| 1896 | 30 / #354 / 0.025% |
| 1895 | 29 / #343 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 24 / #383 / 0.021% |
| 1893 | 23 / #377 / 0.020% |
| 1892 | 41 / #285 / 0.034% |
| 1891 | 24 / #354 / 0.024% |
| 1890 | 24 / #365 / 0.022% |
| 1889 | 33 / #300 / 0.030% |
| 1888 | 50 / #247 / 0.041% |
| 1887 | 41 / #247 / 0.040% |
| 1886 | 55 / #229 / 0.050% |
| 1885 | 43 / #254 / 0.040% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 41 / #266 / 0.036% |
| 1883 | 55 / #202 / 0.053% |
| 1882 | 50 / #236 / 0.044% |
| 1881 | 40 / #249 / 0.040% |
| 1880 | 57 / #212 / 0.052% |