Total babies named Juliet (all years): 36,826
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,116 / #283 / 0.069% |
| 2023 | 1,063 / #292 / 0.066% |
| 2022 | 1,075 / #293 / 0.066% |
| 2021 | 1,078 / #295 / 0.066% |
| 2020 | 1,037 / #306 / 0.064% |
| 2019 | 1,231 / #269 / 0.073% |
| 2018 | 1,347 / #243 / 0.079% |
| 2017 | 1,380 / #228 / 0.080% |
| 2016 | 1,397 / #228 / 0.079% |
| 2015 | 1,357 / #240 / 0.076% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 1,268 / #259 / 0.071% |
| 2013 | 1,333 / #238 / 0.076% |
| 2012 | 1,271 / #254 / 0.072% |
| 2011 | 1,276 / #250 / 0.073% |
| 2010 | 1,142 / #286 / 0.064% |
| 2009 | 1,024 / #318 / 0.056% |
| 2008 | 697 / #453 / 0.037% |
| 2007 | 609 / #517 / 0.032% |
| 2006 | 503 / #582 / 0.026% |
| 2005 | 484 / #589 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 422 / #650 / 0.023% |
| 2003 | 452 / #603 / 0.025% |
| 2002 | 428 / #602 / 0.024% |
| 2001 | 460 / #564 / 0.026% |
| 2000 | 405 / #623 / 0.022% |
| 1999 | 396 / #613 / 0.022% |
| 1998 | 397 / #606 / 0.022% |
| 1997 | 365 / #617 / 0.021% |
| 1996 | 244 / #825 / 0.014% |
| 1995 | 171 / #1051 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 176 / #1040 / 0.010% |
| 1993 | 166 / #1091 / 0.009% |
| 1992 | 168 / #1078 / 0.009% |
| 1991 | 175 / #1047 / 0.009% |
| 1990 | 156 / #1123 / 0.008% |
| 1989 | 181 / #963 / 0.010% |
| 1988 | 146 / #1080 / 0.008% |
| 1987 | 146 / #1056 / 0.008% |
| 1986 | 139 / #1081 / 0.008% |
| 1985 | 168 / #934 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 127 / #1093 / 0.008% |
| 1983 | 165 / #911 / 0.010% |
| 1982 | 173 / #887 / 0.010% |
| 1981 | 179 / #868 / 0.011% |
| 1980 | 181 / #854 / 0.011% |
| 1979 | 178 / #869 / 0.011% |
| 1978 | 154 / #922 / 0.010% |
| 1977 | 140 / #981 / 0.009% |
| 1976 | 159 / #858 / 0.011% |
| 1975 | 218 / #687 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 203 / #715 / 0.014% |
| 1973 | 245 / #624 / 0.017% |
| 1972 | 256 / #615 / 0.017% |
| 1971 | 370 / #508 / 0.022% |
| 1970 | 393 / #505 / 0.022% |
| 1969 | 291 / #581 / 0.017% |
| 1968 | 182 / #728 / 0.011% |
| 1967 | 185 / #722 / 0.011% |
| 1966 | 193 / #707 / 0.011% |
| 1965 | 205 / #687 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 200 / #736 / 0.011% |
| 1963 | 215 / #690 / 0.011% |
| 1962 | 244 / #649 / 0.012% |
| 1961 | 196 / #744 / 0.010% |
| 1960 | 172 / #779 / 0.009% |
| 1959 | 153 / #830 / 0.008% |
| 1958 | 131 / #896 / 0.007% |
| 1957 | 154 / #818 / 0.008% |
| 1956 | 124 / #899 / 0.006% |
| 1955 | 122 / #880 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 126 / #839 / 0.006% |
| 1953 | 103 / #932 / 0.005% |
| 1952 | 93 / #977 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 93 / #964 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 94 / #920 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 90 / #938 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 81 / #969 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 80 / #987 / 0.005% |
| 1946 | 91 / #869 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 64 / #971 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 89 / #809 / 0.007% |
| 1943 | 82 / #863 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 78 / #879 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 88 / #769 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 80 / #790 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 69 / #841 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 84 / #758 / 0.008% |
| 1937 | 73 / #805 / 0.007% |
| 1936 | 43 / #1073 / 0.004% |
| 1935 | 53 / #957 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 38 / #1156 / 0.004% |
| 1933 | 46 / #1032 / 0.005% |
| 1932 | 63 / #887 / 0.006% |
| 1931 | 59 / #904 / 0.006% |
| 1930 | 50 / #1046 / 0.004% |
| 1929 | 66 / #884 / 0.006% |
| 1928 | 67 / #899 / 0.006% |
| 1927 | 68 / #908 / 0.006% |
| 1926 | 88 / #771 / 0.007% |
| 1925 | 76 / #856 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 92 / #779 / 0.007% |
| 1923 | 90 / #770 / 0.007% |
| 1922 | 78 / #832 / 0.006% |
| 1921 | 83 / #804 / 0.007% |
| 1920 | 95 / #744 / 0.008% |
| 1919 | 81 / #785 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 100 / #721 / 0.009% |
| 1917 | 85 / #754 / 0.008% |
| 1916 | 99 / #688 / 0.009% |
| 1915 | 66 / #810 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 74 / #678 / 0.010% |
| 1913 | 49 / #754 / 0.008% |
| 1912 | 42 / #773 / 0.008% |
| 1911 | 41 / #681 / 0.010% |
| 1910 | 24 / #884 / 0.006% |
| 1909 | 30 / #738 / 0.009% |
| 1908 | 30 / #719 / 0.009% |
| 1907 | 34 / #642 / 0.011% |
| 1906 | 24 / #749 / 0.008% |
| 1905 | 16 / #950 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 21 / #791 / 0.008% |
| 1903 | 15 / #912 / 0.006% |
| 1902 | 23 / #727 / 0.009% |
| 1901 | 17 / #810 / 0.007% |
| 1900 | 16 / #954 / 0.005% |
| 1899 | 17 / #802 / 0.007% |
| 1898 | 15 / #901 / 0.006% |
| 1897 | 19 / #730 / 0.008% |
| 1896 | 22 / #674 / 0.009% |
| 1895 | 20 / #711 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 16 / #766 / 0.007% |
| 1893 | 11 / #927 / 0.005% |
| 1892 | 11 / #936 / 0.005% |
| 1891 | 6 / #1270 / 0.003% |
| 1890 | 15 / #706 / 0.008% |
| 1889 | 7 / #1075 / 0.004% |
| 1888 | 12 / #770 / 0.007% |
| 1887 | 11 / #715 / 0.008% |
| 1886 | 24 / #442 / 0.017% |
| 1885 | 9 / #775 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 13 / #601 / 0.010% |
| 1883 | 10 / #631 / 0.009% |
| 1882 | 7 / #775 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 9 / #604 / 0.010% |
| 1880 | 10 / #563 / 0.011% |