Total babies named Lea (all years): 34,140
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 324 / #834 / 0.020% |
| 2023 | 349 / #802 / 0.022% |
| 2022 | 362 / #784 / 0.022% |
| 2021 | 377 / #758 / 0.023% |
| 2020 | 362 / #752 / 0.022% |
| 2019 | 389 / #727 / 0.023% |
| 2018 | 410 / #710 / 0.024% |
| 2017 | 337 / #810 / 0.020% |
| 2016 | 422 / #690 / 0.024% |
| 2015 | 382 / #739 / 0.021% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 416 / #682 / 0.023% |
| 2013 | 473 / #599 / 0.027% |
| 2012 | 470 / #610 / 0.027% |
| 2011 | 527 / #556 / 0.030% |
| 2010 | 514 / #569 / 0.029% |
| 2009 | 431 / #675 / 0.023% |
| 2008 | 479 / #643 / 0.025% |
| 2007 | 432 / #680 / 0.022% |
| 2006 | 481 / #608 / 0.025% |
| 2005 | 473 / #602 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 446 / #616 / 0.024% |
| 2003 | 396 / #669 / 0.022% |
| 2002 | 382 / #665 / 0.021% |
| 2001 | 363 / #685 / 0.020% |
| 2000 | 367 / #663 / 0.020% |
| 1999 | 365 / #643 / 0.021% |
| 1998 | 365 / #637 / 0.021% |
| 1997 | 367 / #615 / 0.021% |
| 1996 | 409 / #568 / 0.023% |
| 1995 | 332 / #649 / 0.019% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 378 / #595 / 0.021% |
| 1993 | 402 / #584 / 0.022% |
| 1992 | 358 / #631 / 0.019% |
| 1991 | 389 / #589 / 0.021% |
| 1990 | 465 / #516 / 0.024% |
| 1989 | 395 / #565 / 0.021% |
| 1988 | 402 / #544 / 0.023% |
| 1987 | 357 / #561 / 0.021% |
| 1986 | 345 / #570 / 0.020% |
| 1985 | 378 / #529 / 0.022% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 404 / #494 / 0.024% |
| 1983 | 349 / #537 / 0.021% |
| 1982 | 384 / #519 / 0.023% |
| 1981 | 466 / #461 / 0.028% |
| 1980 | 464 / #457 / 0.028% |
| 1979 | 472 / #436 / 0.029% |
| 1978 | 385 / #502 / 0.025% |
| 1977 | 398 / #481 / 0.026% |
| 1976 | 349 / #510 / 0.024% |
| 1975 | 403 / #466 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 449 / #431 / 0.031% |
| 1973 | 424 / #445 / 0.029% |
| 1972 | 445 / #434 / 0.029% |
| 1971 | 535 / #400 / 0.032% |
| 1970 | 593 / #397 / 0.034% |
| 1969 | 527 / #419 / 0.031% |
| 1968 | 491 / #428 / 0.030% |
| 1967 | 519 / #403 / 0.031% |
| 1966 | 465 / #436 / 0.027% |
| 1965 | 442 / #455 / 0.025% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 403 / #482 / 0.021% |
| 1963 | 450 / #458 / 0.023% |
| 1962 | 420 / #471 / 0.021% |
| 1961 | 403 / #483 / 0.020% |
| 1960 | 373 / #503 / 0.018% |
| 1959 | 416 / #475 / 0.021% |
| 1958 | 446 / #450 / 0.022% |
| 1957 | 342 / #518 / 0.017% |
| 1956 | 382 / #478 / 0.019% |
| 1955 | 338 / #502 / 0.017% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 243 / #580 / 0.013% |
| 1953 | 192 / #644 / 0.010% |
| 1952 | 210 / #598 / 0.011% |
| 1951 | 171 / #670 / 0.010% |
| 1950 | 149 / #704 / 0.009% |
| 1949 | 131 / #748 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 153 / #673 / 0.009% |
| 1947 | 153 / #679 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 122 / #735 / 0.008% |
| 1945 | 95 / #770 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 83 / #840 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 92 / #803 / 0.007% |
| 1942 | 96 / #775 / 0.007% |
| 1941 | 97 / #715 / 0.008% |
| 1940 | 77 / #813 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 65 / #871 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 72 / #836 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 78 / #777 / 0.007% |
| 1936 | 59 / #891 / 0.006% |
| 1935 | 62 / #878 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 70 / #806 / 0.007% |
| 1933 | 65 / #831 / 0.006% |
| 1932 | 53 / #974 / 0.005% |
| 1931 | 71 / #808 / 0.007% |
| 1930 | 76 / #813 / 0.007% |
| 1929 | 60 / #926 / 0.005% |
| 1928 | 73 / #849 / 0.006% |
| 1927 | 69 / #900 / 0.006% |
| 1926 | 67 / #916 / 0.006% |
| 1925 | 59 / #970 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 61 / #981 / 0.005% |
| 1923 | 66 / #904 / 0.005% |
| 1922 | 82 / #806 / 0.007% |
| 1921 | 64 / #931 / 0.005% |
| 1920 | 62 / #925 / 0.005% |
| 1919 | 76 / #808 / 0.007% |
| 1918 | 93 / #740 / 0.008% |
| 1917 | 65 / #851 / 0.006% |
| 1916 | 80 / #768 / 0.008% |
| 1915 | 58 / #861 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 56 / #773 / 0.007% |
| 1913 | 43 / #807 / 0.007% |
| 1912 | 45 / #752 / 0.008% |
| 1911 | 51 / #599 / 0.012% |
| 1910 | 23 / #904 / 0.006% |
| 1909 | 27 / #782 / 0.008% |
| 1908 | 35 / #659 / 0.010% |
| 1907 | 25 / #755 / 0.008% |
| 1906 | 24 / #751 / 0.008% |
| 1905 | 23 / #770 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 15 / #951 / 0.005% |
| 1903 | 16 / #882 / 0.006% |
| 1902 | 25 / #680 / 0.009% |
| 1901 | 15 / #870 / 0.006% |
| 1900 | 29 / #665 / 0.010% |
| 1899 | 19 / #743 / 0.008% |
| 1898 | 30 / #591 / 0.012% |
| 1897 | 15 / #849 / 0.006% |
| 1896 | 23 / #660 / 0.010% |
| 1895 | 11 / #1022 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 27 / #564 / 0.012% |
| 1893 | 19 / #674 / 0.009% |
| 1892 | 14 / #816 / 0.007% |
| 1891 | 15 / #711 / 0.008% |
| 1890 | 13 / #777 / 0.007% |
| 1889 | 8 / #993 / 0.004% |
| 1888 | 17 / #622 / 0.010% |
| 1887 | 9 / #825 / 0.006% |
| 1886 | 7 / #949 / 0.005% |
| 1885 | 16 / #549 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 15 / #551 / 0.012% |
| 1883 | 12 / #572 / 0.011% |
| 1882 | 6 / #857 / 0.006% |
| 1881 | 7 / #716 / 0.008% |
| 1880 | 7 / #709 / 0.008% |