Total babies named Lilly (all years): 65,499
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,217 / #259 / 0.075% |
| 2023 | 1,200 / #257 / 0.075% |
| 2022 | 1,310 / #232 / 0.080% |
| 2021 | 1,353 / #219 / 0.083% |
| 2020 | 1,288 / #229 / 0.080% |
| 2019 | 1,550 / #190 / 0.092% |
| 2018 | 1,785 / #160 / 0.105% |
| 2017 | 1,931 / #152 / 0.112% |
| 2016 | 2,167 / #143 / 0.122% |
| 2015 | 2,323 / #139 / 0.130% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 2,581 / #124 / 0.145% |
| 2013 | 2,619 / #122 / 0.149% |
| 2012 | 2,790 / #110 / 0.158% |
| 2011 | 2,872 / #103 / 0.163% |
| 2010 | 2,890 / #106 / 0.163% |
| 2009 | 2,832 / #116 / 0.154% |
| 2008 | 2,694 / #125 / 0.142% |
| 2007 | 2,402 / #146 / 0.125% |
| 2006 | 2,279 / #150 / 0.120% |
| 2005 | 1,907 / #180 / 0.103% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 1,616 / #211 / 0.088% |
| 2003 | 1,188 / #265 / 0.065% |
| 2002 | 911 / #333 / 0.051% |
| 2001 | 782 / #380 / 0.043% |
| 2000 | 659 / #428 / 0.036% |
| 1999 | 488 / #522 / 0.028% |
| 1998 | 414 / #583 / 0.023% |
| 1997 | 332 / #663 / 0.019% |
| 1996 | 234 / #854 / 0.013% |
| 1995 | 208 / #909 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 135 / #1267 / 0.008% |
| 1993 | 127 / #1322 / 0.007% |
| 1992 | 122 / #1365 / 0.007% |
| 1991 | 102 / #1530 / 0.005% |
| 1990 | 108 / #1451 / 0.006% |
| 1989 | 103 / #1441 / 0.006% |
| 1988 | 99 / #1416 / 0.006% |
| 1987 | 62 / #1869 / 0.004% |
| 1986 | 74 / #1609 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 73 / #1625 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 47 / #2130 / 0.003% |
| 1983 | 51 / #2005 / 0.003% |
| 1982 | 75 / #1576 / 0.004% |
| 1981 | 70 / #1653 / 0.004% |
| 1980 | 59 / #1856 / 0.004% |
| 1979 | 60 / #1802 / 0.004% |
| 1978 | 65 / #1644 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 61 / #1708 / 0.004% |
| 1976 | 42 / #2083 / 0.003% |
| 1975 | 60 / #1634 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 65 / #1508 / 0.004% |
| 1973 | 68 / #1436 / 0.005% |
| 1972 | 60 / #1551 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 76 / #1401 / 0.005% |
| 1970 | 75 / #1397 / 0.004% |
| 1969 | 75 / #1311 / 0.004% |
| 1968 | 93 / #1110 / 0.006% |
| 1967 | 79 / #1197 / 0.005% |
| 1966 | 104 / #1014 / 0.006% |
| 1965 | 120 / #928 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 108 / #1044 / 0.006% |
| 1963 | 117 / #986 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 143 / #879 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 157 / #843 / 0.008% |
| 1960 | 137 / #900 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 144 / #852 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 120 / #943 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 148 / #836 / 0.007% |
| 1956 | 163 / #767 / 0.008% |
| 1955 | 138 / #822 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 133 / #816 / 0.007% |
| 1953 | 127 / #824 / 0.007% |
| 1952 | 135 / #767 / 0.007% |
| 1951 | 170 / #672 / 0.009% |
| 1950 | 138 / #728 / 0.008% |
| 1949 | 129 / #761 / 0.008% |
| 1948 | 152 / #675 / 0.009% |
| 1947 | 152 / #683 / 0.009% |
| 1946 | 149 / #649 / 0.009% |
| 1945 | 140 / #615 / 0.011% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 163 / #574 / 0.012% |
| 1943 | 153 / #614 / 0.011% |
| 1942 | 194 / #534 / 0.014% |
| 1941 | 197 / #496 / 0.016% |
| 1940 | 167 / #530 / 0.015% |
| 1939 | 176 / #507 / 0.016% |
| 1938 | 225 / #447 / 0.020% |
| 1937 | 187 / #479 / 0.018% |
| 1936 | 198 / #454 / 0.019% |
| 1935 | 156 / #512 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 217 / #440 / 0.021% |
| 1933 | 209 / #449 / 0.021% |
| 1932 | 224 / #444 / 0.021% |
| 1931 | 199 / #458 / 0.019% |
| 1930 | 243 / #426 / 0.022% |
| 1929 | 253 / #419 / 0.023% |
| 1928 | 271 / #413 / 0.024% |
| 1927 | 283 / #408 / 0.024% |
| 1926 | 306 / #394 / 0.026% |
| 1925 | 282 / #409 / 0.023% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 301 / #396 / 0.024% |
| 1923 | 316 / #374 / 0.026% |
| 1922 | 304 / #375 / 0.025% |
| 1921 | 339 / #360 / 0.027% |
| 1920 | 309 / #376 / 0.026% |
| 1919 | 298 / #377 / 0.026% |
| 1918 | 319 / #362 / 0.028% |
| 1917 | 298 / #364 / 0.028% |
| 1916 | 316 / #348 / 0.030% |
| 1915 | 279 / #360 / 0.028% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 229 / #347 / 0.030% |
| 1913 | 179 / #363 / 0.029% |
| 1912 | 168 / #354 / 0.030% |
| 1911 | 154 / #315 / 0.037% |
| 1910 | 129 / #352 / 0.033% |
| 1909 | 125 / #322 / 0.036% |
| 1908 | 137 / #304 / 0.041% |
| 1907 | 144 / #289 / 0.045% |
| 1906 | 137 / #284 / 0.046% |
| 1905 | 130 / #293 / 0.045% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 133 / #274 / 0.048% |
| 1903 | 123 / #284 / 0.047% |
| 1902 | 126 / #279 / 0.048% |
| 1901 | 105 / #298 / 0.044% |
| 1900 | 154 / #264 / 0.051% |
| 1899 | 107 / #279 / 0.046% |
| 1898 | 133 / #261 / 0.051% |
| 1897 | 86 / #315 / 0.037% |
| 1896 | 121 / #259 / 0.051% |
| 1895 | 108 / #271 / 0.046% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 127 / #239 / 0.057% |
| 1893 | 114 / #248 / 0.054% |
| 1892 | 109 / #254 / 0.051% |
| 1891 | 98 / #245 / 0.053% |
| 1890 | 104 / #240 / 0.055% |
| 1889 | 95 / #240 / 0.053% |
| 1888 | 124 / #202 / 0.069% |
| 1887 | 83 / #232 / 0.057% |
| 1886 | 85 / #216 / 0.059% |
| 1885 | 80 / #220 / 0.060% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 63 / #242 / 0.049% |
| 1883 | 62 / #230 / 0.055% |
| 1882 | 70 / #200 / 0.065% |
| 1881 | 55 / #203 / 0.060% |
| 1880 | 64 / #192 / 0.070% |