Total babies named Lincoln (all years): 102,155
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 4,567 / #73 / 0.266% |
| 2023 | 4,863 / #64 / 0.285% |
| 2022 | 5,624 / #54 / 0.322% |
| 2021 | 6,695 / #45 / 0.383% |
| 2020 | 7,058 / #40 / 0.409% |
| 2019 | 7,471 / #41 / 0.417% |
| 2018 | 7,406 / #41 / 0.408% |
| 2017 | 8,201 / #41 / 0.443% |
| 2016 | 7,127 / #51 / 0.376% |
| 2015 | 6,001 / #66 / 0.313% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 4,824 / #87 / 0.251% |
| 2013 | 4,039 / #95 / 0.214% |
| 2012 | 2,912 / #132 / 0.154% |
| 2011 | 2,158 / #179 / 0.114% |
| 2010 | 1,871 / #199 / 0.098% |
| 2009 | 2,012 / #189 / 0.101% |
| 2008 | 1,817 / #211 / 0.089% |
| 2007 | 1,655 / #224 / 0.080% |
| 2006 | 1,109 / #301 / 0.054% |
| 2005 | 502 / #495 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 413 / #555 / 0.021% |
| 2003 | 410 / #549 / 0.021% |
| 2002 | 329 / #610 / 0.017% |
| 2001 | 309 / #616 / 0.016% |
| 2000 | 247 / #711 / 0.013% |
| 1999 | 214 / #748 / 0.011% |
| 1998 | 165 / #883 / 0.009% |
| 1997 | 156 / #889 / 0.008% |
| 1996 | 149 / #899 / 0.008% |
| 1995 | 191 / #777 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 187 / #771 / 0.010% |
| 1993 | 178 / #794 / 0.009% |
| 1992 | 157 / #841 / 0.008% |
| 1991 | 153 / #840 / 0.008% |
| 1990 | 143 / #856 / 0.007% |
| 1989 | 122 / #920 / 0.006% |
| 1988 | 122 / #861 / 0.006% |
| 1987 | 124 / #842 / 0.007% |
| 1986 | 86 / #1000 / 0.005% |
| 1985 | 117 / #828 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 141 / #734 / 0.008% |
| 1983 | 112 / #824 / 0.006% |
| 1982 | 119 / #811 / 0.007% |
| 1981 | 119 / #806 / 0.007% |
| 1980 | 95 / #916 / 0.005% |
| 1979 | 98 / #886 / 0.006% |
| 1978 | 95 / #885 / 0.006% |
| 1977 | 149 / #696 / 0.009% |
| 1976 | 151 / #668 / 0.010% |
| 1975 | 147 / #678 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 108 / #775 / 0.007% |
| 1973 | 103 / #784 / 0.007% |
| 1972 | 140 / #679 / 0.009% |
| 1971 | 181 / #618 / 0.010% |
| 1970 | 146 / #687 / 0.008% |
| 1969 | 105 / #766 / 0.006% |
| 1968 | 71 / #863 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 98 / #747 / 0.006% |
| 1966 | 116 / #689 / 0.007% |
| 1965 | 128 / #656 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 202 / #557 / 0.010% |
| 1963 | 193 / #568 / 0.010% |
| 1962 | 143 / #648 / 0.007% |
| 1961 | 119 / #701 / 0.006% |
| 1960 | 85 / #829 / 0.004% |
| 1959 | 79 / #857 / 0.004% |
| 1958 | 72 / #891 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 97 / #763 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 72 / #886 / 0.003% |
| 1955 | 85 / #796 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 68 / #899 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 87 / #762 / 0.004% |
| 1952 | 95 / #723 / 0.005% |
| 1951 | 76 / #808 / 0.004% |
| 1950 | 87 / #739 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 90 / #725 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 75 / #791 / 0.004% |
| 1947 | 94 / #710 / 0.005% |
| 1946 | 75 / #771 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 89 / #644 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 76 / #713 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 92 / #671 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 96 / #658 / 0.007% |
| 1941 | 88 / #649 / 0.007% |
| 1940 | 70 / #733 / 0.006% |
| 1939 | 78 / #673 / 0.007% |
| 1938 | 76 / #697 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 75 / #693 / 0.007% |
| 1936 | 72 / #706 / 0.007% |
| 1935 | 76 / #696 / 0.007% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 92 / #628 / 0.009% |
| 1933 | 91 / #611 / 0.009% |
| 1932 | 96 / #603 / 0.009% |
| 1931 | 110 / #561 / 0.011% |
| 1930 | 86 / #674 / 0.008% |
| 1929 | 101 / #602 / 0.009% |
| 1928 | 130 / #531 / 0.012% |
| 1927 | 131 / #539 / 0.012% |
| 1926 | 144 / #506 / 0.013% |
| 1925 | 142 / #512 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 156 / #494 / 0.014% |
| 1923 | 133 / #529 / 0.012% |
| 1922 | 108 / #622 / 0.010% |
| 1921 | 120 / #579 / 0.011% |
| 1920 | 137 / #523 / 0.013% |
| 1919 | 117 / #555 / 0.012% |
| 1918 | 128 / #534 / 0.013% |
| 1917 | 127 / #511 / 0.014% |
| 1916 | 130 / #499 / 0.015% |
| 1915 | 118 / #513 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 103 / #479 / 0.016% |
| 1913 | 63 / #548 / 0.012% |
| 1912 | 49 / #576 / 0.011% |
| 1911 | 34 / #511 / 0.015% |
| 1910 | 36 / #459 / 0.019% |
| 1909 | 33 / #443 / 0.020% |
| 1908 | 20 / #571 / 0.013% |
| 1907 | 13 / #763 / 0.009% |
| 1906 | 18 / #558 / 0.014% |
| 1905 | 19 / #539 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 15 / #602 / 0.012% |
| 1903 | 11 / #721 / 0.009% |
| 1902 | 17 / #531 / 0.014% |
| 1901 | 10 / #709 / 0.009% |
| 1900 | 20 / #545 / 0.013% |
| 1899 | 14 / #534 / 0.013% |
| 1898 | 8 / #852 / 0.007% |
| 1897 | 14 / #570 / 0.012% |
| 1896 | 13 / #614 / 0.011% |
| 1895 | 26 / #375 / 0.022% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 10 / #704 / 0.009% |
| 1893 | 11 / #636 / 0.010% |
| 1892 | 17 / #489 / 0.014% |
| 1891 | 15 / #463 / 0.015% |
| 1890 | 13 / #553 / 0.012% |
| 1889 | 14 / #513 / 0.013% |
| 1888 | 15 / #515 / 0.012% |
| 1887 | 8 / #717 / 0.008% |
| 1886 | 6 / #915 / 0.005% |
| 1885 | 11 / #589 / 0.010% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 12 / #545 / 0.011% |
| 1882 | 13 / #528 / 0.011% |
| 1881 | 5 / #954 / 0.005% |
| 1880 | 10 / #620 / 0.009% |