Total babies named Liza (all years): 17,526
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 111 / #1806 / 0.007% |
| 2023 | 125 / #1661 / 0.008% |
| 2022 | 119 / #1748 / 0.007% |
| 2021 | 138 / #1529 / 0.008% |
| 2020 | 116 / #1737 / 0.007% |
| 2019 | 132 / #1611 / 0.008% |
| 2018 | 126 / #1668 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 117 / #1785 / 0.007% |
| 2016 | 115 / #1806 / 0.006% |
| 2015 | 126 / #1691 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 122 / #1721 / 0.007% |
| 2013 | 114 / #1803 / 0.007% |
| 2012 | 108 / #1866 / 0.006% |
| 2011 | 101 / #1962 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 93 / #2132 / 0.005% |
| 2009 | 126 / #1738 / 0.007% |
| 2008 | 107 / #1972 / 0.006% |
| 2007 | 104 / #1982 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 103 / #1952 / 0.005% |
| 2005 | 116 / #1711 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 114 / #1706 / 0.006% |
| 2003 | 145 / #1384 / 0.008% |
| 2002 | 133 / #1439 / 0.007% |
| 2001 | 156 / #1262 / 0.009% |
| 2000 | 140 / #1351 / 0.008% |
| 1999 | 145 / #1278 / 0.008% |
| 1998 | 158 / #1182 / 0.009% |
| 1997 | 142 / #1256 / 0.008% |
| 1996 | 184 / #1016 / 0.011% |
| 1995 | 170 / #1058 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 183 / #1016 / 0.010% |
| 1993 | 184 / #1010 / 0.010% |
| 1992 | 193 / #990 / 0.010% |
| 1991 | 224 / #881 / 0.012% |
| 1990 | 219 / #887 / 0.012% |
| 1989 | 265 / #745 / 0.014% |
| 1988 | 242 / #777 / 0.014% |
| 1987 | 233 / #769 / 0.013% |
| 1986 | 220 / #775 / 0.013% |
| 1985 | 242 / #714 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 283 / #628 / 0.017% |
| 1983 | 323 / #564 / 0.019% |
| 1982 | 393 / #510 / 0.023% |
| 1981 | 421 / #489 / 0.025% |
| 1980 | 460 / #462 / 0.028% |
| 1979 | 448 / #454 / 0.028% |
| 1978 | 417 / #474 / 0.027% |
| 1977 | 498 / #411 / 0.032% |
| 1976 | 432 / #448 / 0.029% |
| 1975 | 435 / #450 / 0.030% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 392 / #459 / 0.027% |
| 1973 | 518 / #392 / 0.036% |
| 1972 | 374 / #479 / 0.025% |
| 1971 | 340 / #537 / 0.020% |
| 1970 | 410 / #489 / 0.023% |
| 1969 | 315 / #557 / 0.019% |
| 1968 | 312 / #549 / 0.019% |
| 1967 | 317 / #530 / 0.019% |
| 1966 | 340 / #514 / 0.020% |
| 1965 | 348 / #509 / 0.020% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 287 / #585 / 0.015% |
| 1963 | 230 / #665 / 0.012% |
| 1962 | 200 / #732 / 0.010% |
| 1961 | 210 / #719 / 0.010% |
| 1960 | 135 / #912 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 153 / #831 / 0.008% |
| 1958 | 113 / #975 / 0.006% |
| 1957 | 98 / #1053 / 0.005% |
| 1956 | 42 / #1648 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 65 / #1259 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 61 / #1269 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 62 / #1233 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 55 / #1294 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 56 / #1248 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 58 / #1219 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 35 / #1582 / 0.002% |
| 1948 | 28 / #1802 / 0.002% |
| 1947 | 39 / #1518 / 0.002% |
| 1946 | 37 / #1453 / 0.002% |
| 1945 | 34 / #1393 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 22 / #1841 / 0.002% |
| 1943 | 34 / #1435 / 0.002% |
| 1942 | 21 / #1897 / 0.002% |
| 1941 | 22 / #1722 / 0.002% |
| 1940 | 27 / #1499 / 0.002% |
| 1939 | 23 / #1617 / 0.002% |
| 1938 | 19 / #1842 / 0.002% |
| 1937 | 17 / #1962 / 0.002% |
| 1936 | 18 / #1838 / 0.002% |
| 1935 | 24 / #1529 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 20 / #1743 / 0.002% |
| 1933 | 27 / #1430 / 0.003% |
| 1932 | 24 / #1585 / 0.002% |
| 1931 | 32 / #1306 / 0.003% |
| 1930 | 25 / #1588 / 0.002% |
| 1929 | 12 / #2665 / 0.001% |
| 1928 | 26 / #1619 / 0.002% |
| 1927 | 32 / #1442 / 0.003% |
| 1926 | 36 / #1316 / 0.003% |
| 1925 | 34 / #1396 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 44 / #1196 / 0.004% |
| 1923 | 40 / #1239 / 0.003% |
| 1922 | 29 / #1553 / 0.002% |
| 1921 | 22 / #1896 / 0.002% |
| 1920 | 31 / #1458 / 0.003% |
| 1919 | 29 / #1468 / 0.003% |
| 1918 | 41 / #1173 / 0.004% |
| 1917 | 44 / #1070 / 0.004% |
| 1916 | 31 / #1320 / 0.003% |
| 1915 | 28 / #1356 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 30 / #1109 / 0.004% |
| 1913 | 35 / #904 / 0.006% |
| 1912 | 35 / #855 / 0.006% |
| 1911 | 32 / #772 / 0.008% |
| 1910 | 42 / #660 / 0.011% |
| 1909 | 22 / #883 / 0.006% |
| 1908 | 23 / #816 / 0.007% |
| 1907 | 18 / #910 / 0.006% |
| 1906 | 29 / #684 / 0.010% |
| 1905 | 21 / #814 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 15 / #953 / 0.005% |
| 1903 | 20 / #775 / 0.008% |
| 1902 | 30 / #609 / 0.011% |
| 1901 | 21 / #712 / 0.009% |
| 1900 | 26 / #716 / 0.009% |
| 1899 | 31 / #544 / 0.013% |
| 1898 | 22 / #706 / 0.009% |
| 1897 | 25 / #622 / 0.011% |
| 1896 | 27 / #602 / 0.011% |
| 1895 | 20 / #714 / 0.009% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 27 / #565 / 0.012% |
| 1893 | 23 / #608 / 0.011% |
| 1892 | 30 / #500 / 0.014% |
| 1891 | 26 / #511 / 0.014% |
| 1890 | 40 / #402 / 0.021% |
| 1889 | 28 / #472 / 0.016% |
| 1888 | 28 / #475 / 0.016% |
| 1887 | 26 / #439 / 0.018% |
| 1886 | 27 / #423 / 0.019% |
| 1885 | 19 / #494 / 0.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 18 / #491 / 0.014% |
| 1883 | 20 / #428 / 0.018% |
| 1882 | 16 / #470 / 0.015% |
| 1881 | 23 / #345 / 0.025% |
| 1880 | 18 / #398 / 0.020% |