Total babies named Lonnie (all years): 101,366
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 89 / #1822 / 0.005% |
| 2023 | 94 / #1750 / 0.006% |
| 2022 | 85 / #1868 / 0.005% |
| 2021 | 98 / #1681 / 0.006% |
| 2020 | 98 / #1642 / 0.006% |
| 2019 | 89 / #1759 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 95 / #1677 / 0.005% |
| 2017 | 87 / #1773 / 0.005% |
| 2016 | 115 / #1488 / 0.006% |
| 2015 | 122 / #1410 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 122 / #1393 / 0.006% |
| 2013 | 118 / #1419 / 0.006% |
| 2012 | 114 / #1454 / 0.006% |
| 2011 | 112 / #1464 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 125 / #1365 / 0.007% |
| 2009 | 140 / #1262 / 0.007% |
| 2008 | 149 / #1191 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 110 / #1463 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 166 / #1075 / 0.008% |
| 2005 | 165 / #1024 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 153 / #1056 / 0.008% |
| 2003 | 148 / #1054 / 0.007% |
| 2002 | 179 / #905 / 0.009% |
| 2001 | 181 / #876 / 0.009% |
| 2000 | 194 / #826 / 0.010% |
| 1999 | 205 / #776 / 0.011% |
| 1998 | 194 / #789 / 0.010% |
| 1997 | 224 / #706 / 0.012% |
| 1996 | 246 / #671 / 0.013% |
| 1995 | 265 / #639 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 321 / #575 / 0.017% |
| 1993 | 317 / #577 / 0.016% |
| 1992 | 354 / #540 / 0.018% |
| 1991 | 394 / #497 / 0.020% |
| 1990 | 377 / #509 / 0.018% |
| 1989 | 417 / #461 / 0.021% |
| 1988 | 415 / #443 / 0.022% |
| 1987 | 399 / #446 / 0.021% |
| 1986 | 419 / #420 / 0.023% |
| 1985 | 474 / #380 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 505 / #361 / 0.028% |
| 1983 | 520 / #349 / 0.029% |
| 1982 | 651 / #304 / 0.036% |
| 1981 | 641 / #301 / 0.036% |
| 1980 | 695 / #294 / 0.039% |
| 1979 | 733 / #279 / 0.043% |
| 1978 | 700 / #277 / 0.043% |
| 1977 | 848 / #243 / 0.052% |
| 1976 | 833 / #241 / 0.053% |
| 1975 | 873 / #236 / 0.056% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 922 / #227 / 0.059% |
| 1973 | 985 / #221 / 0.063% |
| 1972 | 1,098 / #207 / 0.068% |
| 1971 | 1,274 / #195 / 0.072% |
| 1970 | 1,382 / #194 / 0.074% |
| 1969 | 1,385 / #192 / 0.077% |
| 1968 | 1,444 / #181 / 0.083% |
| 1967 | 1,325 / #185 / 0.076% |
| 1966 | 1,429 / #178 / 0.080% |
| 1965 | 1,505 / #175 / 0.081% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1,597 / #171 / 0.080% |
| 1963 | 1,574 / #189 / 0.078% |
| 1962 | 1,561 / #194 / 0.075% |
| 1961 | 1,596 / #191 / 0.075% |
| 1960 | 1,704 / #183 / 0.080% |
| 1959 | 1,776 / #173 / 0.083% |
| 1958 | 1,775 / #171 / 0.084% |
| 1957 | 2,047 / #157 / 0.095% |
| 1956 | 2,015 / #155 / 0.095% |
| 1955 | 1,857 / #155 / 0.090% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 1,975 / #146 / 0.097% |
| 1953 | 1,920 / #147 / 0.097% |
| 1952 | 1,888 / #148 / 0.097% |
| 1951 | 1,946 / #139 / 0.103% |
| 1950 | 1,999 / #135 / 0.112% |
| 1949 | 2,018 / #134 / 0.114% |
| 1948 | 2,040 / #135 / 0.116% |
| 1947 | 2,085 / #137 / 0.114% |
| 1946 | 1,775 / #136 / 0.109% |
| 1945 | 1,464 / #143 / 0.109% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 1,434 / #148 / 0.105% |
| 1943 | 1,462 / #144 / 0.102% |
| 1942 | 1,318 / #148 / 0.095% |
| 1941 | 1,202 / #148 / 0.098% |
| 1940 | 1,103 / #153 / 0.095% |
| 1939 | 1,071 / #150 / 0.097% |
| 1938 | 997 / #160 / 0.090% |
| 1937 | 855 / #171 / 0.080% |
| 1936 | 749 / #177 / 0.072% |
| 1935 | 758 / #178 / 0.073% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 754 / #180 / 0.073% |
| 1933 | 736 / #176 / 0.074% |
| 1932 | 761 / #179 / 0.073% |
| 1931 | 720 / #183 / 0.069% |
| 1930 | 716 / #193 / 0.065% |
| 1929 | 722 / #190 / 0.067% |
| 1928 | 708 / #197 / 0.064% |
| 1927 | 709 / #199 / 0.063% |
| 1926 | 660 / #207 / 0.059% |
| 1925 | 707 / #200 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 716 / #196 / 0.063% |
| 1923 | 670 / #202 / 0.061% |
| 1922 | 704 / #195 / 0.065% |
| 1921 | 643 / #209 / 0.058% |
| 1920 | 740 / #186 / 0.070% |
| 1919 | 592 / #210 / 0.060% |
| 1918 | 658 / #195 / 0.065% |
| 1917 | 597 / #196 / 0.065% |
| 1916 | 567 / #202 / 0.064% |
| 1915 | 546 / #199 / 0.064% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 468 / #186 / 0.071% |
| 1913 | 351 / #191 / 0.068% |
| 1912 | 327 / #179 / 0.076% |
| 1911 | 213 / #158 / 0.094% |
| 1910 | 217 / #148 / 0.112% |
| 1909 | 209 / #129 / 0.127% |
| 1908 | 169 / #142 / 0.110% |
| 1907 | 182 / #131 / 0.124% |
| 1906 | 156 / #132 / 0.117% |
| 1905 | 179 / #120 / 0.135% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 133 / #147 / 0.104% |
| 1903 | 145 / #129 / 0.122% |
| 1902 | 138 / #138 / 0.113% |
| 1901 | 148 / #114 / 0.139% |
| 1900 | 186 / #125 / 0.124% |
| 1899 | 119 / #135 / 0.112% |
| 1898 | 129 / #138 / 0.105% |
| 1897 | 114 / #142 / 0.101% |
| 1896 | 159 / #114 / 0.133% |
| 1895 | 120 / #135 / 0.102% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 138 / #117 / 0.119% |
| 1893 | 114 / #131 / 0.102% |
| 1892 | 120 / #134 / 0.098% |
| 1891 | 117 / #118 / 0.116% |
| 1890 | 107 / #135 / 0.096% |
| 1889 | 106 / #136 / 0.096% |
| 1888 | 101 / #150 / 0.084% |
| 1887 | 76 / #166 / 0.075% |
| 1886 | 88 / #158 / 0.079% |
| 1885 | 74 / #177 / 0.069% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 88 / #158 / 0.077% |
| 1883 | 91 / #141 / 0.087% |
| 1882 | 78 / #173 / 0.069% |
| 1881 | 77 / #158 / 0.076% |
| 1880 | 53 / #223 / 0.048% |