Total babies named Lowell (all years): 41,645
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 30 / #3735 / 0.002% |
| 2023 | 31 / #3677 / 0.002% |
| 2022 | 39 / #3136 / 0.002% |
| 2021 | 43 / #2894 / 0.002% |
| 2020 | 38 / #3057 / 0.002% |
| 2019 | 42 / #2920 / 0.002% |
| 2018 | 43 / #2827 / 0.002% |
| 2017 | 37 / #3167 / 0.002% |
| 2016 | 42 / #2865 / 0.002% |
| 2015 | 46 / #2666 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 38 / #3020 / 0.002% |
| 2013 | 38 / #2980 / 0.002% |
| 2012 | 46 / #2657 / 0.002% |
| 2011 | 29 / #3663 / 0.002% |
| 2010 | 28 / #3769 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 40 / #2974 / 0.002% |
| 2008 | 40 / #2984 / 0.002% |
| 2007 | 39 / #3004 / 0.002% |
| 2006 | 38 / #2958 / 0.002% |
| 2005 | 37 / #2880 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 32 / #3125 / 0.002% |
| 2003 | 38 / #2660 / 0.002% |
| 2002 | 33 / #2860 / 0.002% |
| 2001 | 30 / #3034 / 0.002% |
| 2000 | 55 / #1909 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 59 / #1743 / 0.003% |
| 1998 | 49 / #1979 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 50 / #1875 / 0.003% |
| 1996 | 59 / #1650 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 65 / #1485 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 50 / #1763 / 0.003% |
| 1993 | 70 / #1390 / 0.004% |
| 1992 | 81 / #1261 / 0.004% |
| 1991 | 86 / #1199 / 0.004% |
| 1990 | 100 / #1063 / 0.005% |
| 1989 | 96 / #1069 / 0.005% |
| 1988 | 92 / #1028 / 0.005% |
| 1987 | 83 / #1051 / 0.004% |
| 1986 | 95 / #942 / 0.005% |
| 1985 | 102 / #898 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 97 / #890 / 0.005% |
| 1983 | 90 / #934 / 0.005% |
| 1982 | 123 / #800 / 0.007% |
| 1981 | 102 / #884 / 0.006% |
| 1980 | 108 / #855 / 0.006% |
| 1979 | 131 / #760 / 0.008% |
| 1978 | 118 / #777 / 0.007% |
| 1977 | 124 / #765 / 0.008% |
| 1976 | 145 / #692 / 0.009% |
| 1975 | 130 / #728 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 128 / #725 / 0.008% |
| 1973 | 155 / #640 / 0.010% |
| 1972 | 152 / #648 / 0.009% |
| 1971 | 212 / #556 / 0.012% |
| 1970 | 238 / #523 / 0.013% |
| 1969 | 234 / #508 / 0.013% |
| 1968 | 299 / #442 / 0.017% |
| 1967 | 272 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1966 | 292 / #450 / 0.016% |
| 1965 | 323 / #430 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 353 / #427 / 0.018% |
| 1963 | 358 / #426 / 0.018% |
| 1962 | 419 / #395 / 0.020% |
| 1961 | 392 / #400 / 0.018% |
| 1960 | 431 / #381 / 0.020% |
| 1959 | 453 / #368 / 0.021% |
| 1958 | 449 / #364 / 0.021% |
| 1957 | 449 / #360 / 0.021% |
| 1956 | 507 / #329 / 0.024% |
| 1955 | 470 / #340 / 0.023% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 471 / #333 / 0.023% |
| 1953 | 491 / #318 / 0.025% |
| 1952 | 488 / #320 / 0.025% |
| 1951 | 566 / #287 / 0.030% |
| 1950 | 572 / #276 / 0.032% |
| 1949 | 635 / #256 / 0.036% |
| 1948 | 623 / #260 / 0.036% |
| 1947 | 670 / #256 / 0.037% |
| 1946 | 650 / #239 / 0.040% |
| 1945 | 603 / #223 / 0.045% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 720 / #206 / 0.053% |
| 1943 | 807 / #200 / 0.057% |
| 1942 | 884 / #177 / 0.064% |
| 1941 | 865 / #176 / 0.070% |
| 1940 | 870 / #172 / 0.075% |
| 1939 | 924 / #166 / 0.083% |
| 1938 | 966 / #164 / 0.087% |
| 1937 | 982 / #155 / 0.092% |
| 1936 | 1,022 / #150 / 0.099% |
| 1935 | 994 / #152 / 0.095% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 1,033 / #148 / 0.100% |
| 1933 | 880 / #161 / 0.089% |
| 1932 | 1,047 / #150 / 0.100% |
| 1931 | 1,090 / #147 / 0.105% |
| 1930 | 721 / #191 / 0.066% |
| 1929 | 700 / #193 / 0.065% |
| 1928 | 758 / #188 / 0.068% |
| 1927 | 757 / #193 / 0.067% |
| 1926 | 725 / #195 / 0.065% |
| 1925 | 709 / #196 / 0.064% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 819 / #175 / 0.072% |
| 1923 | 710 / #194 / 0.065% |
| 1922 | 698 / #197 / 0.064% |
| 1921 | 690 / #199 / 0.063% |
| 1920 | 670 / #198 / 0.063% |
| 1919 | 608 / #204 / 0.062% |
| 1918 | 555 / #225 / 0.055% |
| 1917 | 551 / #205 / 0.060% |
| 1916 | 529 / #208 / 0.059% |
| 1915 | 536 / #201 / 0.063% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 390 / #209 / 0.060% |
| 1913 | 322 / #207 / 0.063% |
| 1912 | 225 / #231 / 0.052% |
| 1911 | 104 / #252 / 0.046% |
| 1910 | 71 / #293 / 0.037% |
| 1909 | 58 / #301 / 0.035% |
| 1908 | 60 / #279 / 0.039% |
| 1907 | 53 / #293 / 0.036% |
| 1906 | 54 / #268 / 0.041% |
| 1905 | 55 / #267 / 0.042% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 32 / #355 / 0.025% |
| 1903 | 40 / #298 / 0.034% |
| 1902 | 28 / #376 / 0.023% |
| 1901 | 24 / #389 / 0.023% |
| 1900 | 35 / #381 / 0.023% |
| 1899 | 43 / #256 / 0.040% |
| 1898 | 28 / #370 / 0.023% |
| 1897 | 25 / #380 / 0.022% |
| 1896 | 29 / #362 / 0.024% |
| 1895 | 28 / #353 / 0.024% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 17 / #490 / 0.015% |
| 1893 | 15 / #491 / 0.013% |
| 1892 | 11 / #665 / 0.009% |
| 1891 | 12 / #545 / 0.012% |
| 1890 | 22 / #381 / 0.020% |
| 1889 | 19 / #424 / 0.017% |
| 1888 | 9 / #736 / 0.007% |
| 1887 | 9 / #660 / 0.009% |
| 1886 | 11 / #589 / 0.010% |
| 1885 | 9 / #677 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1883 | 8 / #703 / 0.008% |
| 1882 | 10 / #628 / 0.009% |
| 1881 | 5 / #957 / 0.005% |