Total babies named Lucien (all years): 9,730
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 255 / #912 / 0.015% |
| 2023 | 250 / #923 / 0.015% |
| 2022 | 202 / #1082 / 0.012% |
| 2021 | 179 / #1137 / 0.010% |
| 2020 | 182 / #1090 / 0.011% |
| 2019 | 167 / #1166 / 0.009% |
| 2018 | 161 / #1185 / 0.009% |
| 2017 | 167 / #1138 / 0.009% |
| 2016 | 176 / #1113 / 0.009% |
| 2015 | 162 / #1159 / 0.008% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 150 / #1221 / 0.008% |
| 2013 | 173 / #1081 / 0.009% |
| 2012 | 161 / #1139 / 0.008% |
| 2011 | 164 / #1117 / 0.009% |
| 2010 | 169 / #1116 / 0.009% |
| 2009 | 152 / #1189 / 0.008% |
| 2008 | 145 / #1219 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 141 / #1250 / 0.007% |
| 2006 | 150 / #1138 / 0.007% |
| 2005 | 113 / #1339 / 0.006% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 87 / #1539 / 0.004% |
| 2003 | 69 / #1758 / 0.003% |
| 2002 | 69 / #1704 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 81 / #1508 / 0.004% |
| 2000 | 52 / #1987 / 0.003% |
| 1999 | 34 / #2593 / 0.002% |
| 1998 | 43 / #2144 / 0.002% |
| 1997 | 38 / #2246 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 30 / #2575 / 0.002% |
| 1995 | 20 / #3390 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 40 / #2068 / 0.002% |
| 1993 | 31 / #2436 / 0.002% |
| 1992 | 32 / #2340 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 35 / #2123 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 34 / #2148 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 36 / #2015 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 34 / #1936 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 27 / #2200 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 25 / #2265 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 42 / #1559 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 34 / #1707 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 29 / #1887 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 42 / #1505 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 33 / #1750 / 0.002% |
| 1980 | 42 / #1483 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 35 / #1653 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 34 / #1638 / 0.002% |
| 1977 | 33 / #1659 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 25 / #1967 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 30 / #1687 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 35 / #1488 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 28 / #1684 / 0.002% |
| 1972 | 33 / #1493 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 35 / #1454 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 33 / #1483 / 0.002% |
| 1969 | 32 / #1426 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 39 / #1228 / 0.002% |
| 1967 | 41 / #1172 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 28 / #1473 / 0.002% |
| 1965 | 29 / #1447 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 38 / #1274 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 33 / #1370 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 23 / #1695 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 45 / #1192 / 0.002% |
| 1960 | 37 / #1314 / 0.002% |
| 1959 | 41 / #1222 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 48 / #1112 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 53 / #1048 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 47 / #1116 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 53 / #1040 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 57 / #987 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 54 / #985 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 53 / #990 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 47 / #1049 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 65 / #847 / 0.004% |
| 1949 | 73 / #806 / 0.004% |
| 1948 | 78 / #769 / 0.004% |
| 1947 | 85 / #747 / 0.005% |
| 1946 | 84 / #713 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 57 / #834 / 0.004% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 76 / #714 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 75 / #750 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 77 / #735 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 73 / #726 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 67 / #754 / 0.006% |
| 1939 | 63 / #766 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 61 / #791 / 0.006% |
| 1937 | 47 / #917 / 0.004% |
| 1936 | 62 / #777 / 0.006% |
| 1935 | 54 / #855 / 0.005% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 98 / #596 / 0.009% |
| 1933 | 76 / #682 / 0.008% |
| 1932 | 73 / #734 / 0.007% |
| 1931 | 98 / #596 / 0.009% |
| 1930 | 107 / #580 / 0.010% |
| 1929 | 82 / #682 / 0.008% |
| 1928 | 97 / #624 / 0.009% |
| 1927 | 145 / #503 / 0.013% |
| 1926 | 142 / #511 / 0.013% |
| 1925 | 132 / #535 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 129 / #554 / 0.011% |
| 1923 | 158 / #487 / 0.014% |
| 1922 | 137 / #535 / 0.013% |
| 1921 | 141 / #526 / 0.013% |
| 1920 | 122 / #562 / 0.011% |
| 1919 | 129 / #525 / 0.013% |
| 1918 | 118 / #555 / 0.012% |
| 1917 | 119 / #533 / 0.013% |
| 1916 | 147 / #472 / 0.017% |
| 1915 | 125 / #495 / 0.015% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 89 / #521 / 0.014% |
| 1913 | 78 / #494 / 0.015% |
| 1912 | 48 / #589 / 0.011% |
| 1911 | 36 / #492 / 0.016% |
| 1910 | 22 / #630 / 0.011% |
| 1909 | 30 / #465 / 0.018% |
| 1908 | 14 / #730 / 0.009% |
| 1907 | 14 / #725 / 0.010% |
| 1906 | 13 / #696 / 0.010% |
| 1905 | 18 / #560 / 0.014% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 10 / #793 / 0.008% |
| 1903 | 16 / #564 / 0.013% |
| 1902 | 19 / #499 / 0.015% |
| 1901 | 8 / #822 / 0.008% |
| 1900 | 13 / #719 / 0.009% |
| 1899 | 14 / #537 / 0.013% |
| 1898 | 9 / #786 / 0.007% |
| 1897 | 13 / #603 / 0.012% |
| 1896 | 14 / #576 / 0.012% |
| 1895 | 13 / #593 / 0.011% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 12 / #616 / 0.010% |
| 1893 | 13 / #559 / 0.012% |
| 1892 | 10 / #725 / 0.008% |
| 1891 | 12 / #546 / 0.012% |
| 1890 | 10 / #650 / 0.009% |
| 1889 | 12 / #570 / 0.011% |
| 1888 | 16 / #495 / 0.013% |
| 1887 | 11 / #570 / 0.011% |
| 1886 | 8 / #732 / 0.007% |
| 1885 | 14 / #515 / 0.013% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 11 / #590 / 0.010% |
| 1883 | 11 / #578 / 0.011% |
| 1882 | 15 / #480 / 0.013% |
| 1881 | 11 / #551 / 0.011% |
| 1880 | 19 / #397 / 0.017% |