Total babies named Luke (all years): 316,587
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
2024 | 7,039 / #34 / 0.410% |
2023 | 7,244 / #31 / 0.424% |
2022 | 7,389 / #34 / 0.424% |
2021 | 7,708 / #32 / 0.441% |
2020 | 7,782 / #31 / 0.451% |
2019 | 8,440 / #32 / 0.471% |
2018 | 8,624 / #30 / 0.475% |
2017 | 9,223 / #30 / 0.498% |
2016 | 9,999 / #29 / 0.527% |
2015 | 10,292 / #28 / 0.537% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
2014 | 10,521 / #28 / 0.548% |
2013 | 9,587 / #34 / 0.507% |
2012 | 9,022 / #37 / 0.476% |
2011 | 8,706 / #39 / 0.458% |
2010 | 8,849 / #41 / 0.461% |
2009 | 8,624 / #47 / 0.435% |
2008 | 9,423 / #43 / 0.462% |
2007 | 9,608 / #46 / 0.463% |
2006 | 10,087 / #43 / 0.491% |
2005 | 10,011 / #41 / 0.501% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
2004 | 9,597 / #41 / 0.484% |
2003 | 9,304 / #46 / 0.471% |
2002 | 8,692 / #46 / 0.448% |
2001 | 8,008 / #50 / 0.412% |
2000 | 7,149 / #59 / 0.364% |
1999 | 6,137 / #67 / 0.320% |
1998 | 5,284 / #75 / 0.276% |
1997 | 4,953 / #78 / 0.263% |
1996 | 5,017 / #75 / 0.265% |
1995 | 4,629 / #82 / 0.243% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1994 | 4,095 / #91 / 0.212% |
1993 | 4,358 / #87 / 0.222% |
1992 | 4,066 / #93 / 0.204% |
1991 | 3,013 / #113 / 0.149% |
1990 | 2,884 / #118 / 0.140% |
1989 | 2,712 / #121 / 0.136% |
1988 | 2,620 / #119 / 0.137% |
1987 | 2,593 / #111 / 0.139% |
1986 | 2,654 / #106 / 0.144% |
1985 | 2,741 / #106 / 0.148% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1984 | 2,473 / #110 / 0.137% |
1983 | 2,655 / #105 / 0.148% |
1982 | 2,478 / #119 / 0.137% |
1981 | 3,015 / #100 / 0.168% |
1980 | 3,111 / #97 / 0.174% |
1979 | 2,471 / #110 / 0.144% |
1978 | 1,882 / #139 / 0.115% |
1977 | 1,242 / #190 / 0.076% |
1976 | 913 / #223 / 0.058% |
1975 | 778 / #256 / 0.050% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1974 | 725 / #265 / 0.046% |
1973 | 633 / #286 / 0.041% |
1972 | 575 / #319 / 0.035% |
1971 | 530 / #348 / 0.030% |
1970 | 535 / #351 / 0.029% |
1969 | 452 / #367 / 0.025% |
1968 | 387 / #396 / 0.022% |
1967 | 346 / #409 / 0.020% |
1966 | 355 / #398 / 0.020% |
1965 | 400 / #392 / 0.022% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1964 | 445 / #374 / 0.022% |
1963 | 422 / #387 / 0.021% |
1962 | 426 / #392 / 0.021% |
1961 | 415 / #391 / 0.020% |
1960 | 424 / #384 / 0.020% |
1959 | 353 / #425 / 0.017% |
1958 | 337 / #429 / 0.016% |
1957 | 291 / #452 / 0.013% |
1956 | 245 / #486 / 0.012% |
1955 | 219 / #500 / 0.011% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1954 | 197 / #519 / 0.010% |
1953 | 169 / #544 / 0.009% |
1952 | 158 / #557 / 0.008% |
1951 | 169 / #528 / 0.009% |
1950 | 170 / #516 / 0.010% |
1949 | 155 / #534 / 0.009% |
1948 | 155 / #533 / 0.009% |
1947 | 151 / #550 / 0.008% |
1946 | 130 / #564 / 0.008% |
1945 | 117 / #554 / 0.009% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1944 | 117 / #568 / 0.009% |
1943 | 126 / #566 / 0.009% |
1942 | 110 / #601 / 0.008% |
1941 | 121 / #540 / 0.010% |
1940 | 116 / #548 / 0.010% |
1939 | 116 / #533 / 0.010% |
1938 | 123 / #524 / 0.011% |
1937 | 113 / #547 / 0.011% |
1936 | 116 / #532 / 0.011% |
1935 | 121 / #526 / 0.012% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1934 | 122 / #533 / 0.012% |
1933 | 110 / #547 / 0.011% |
1932 | 165 / #438 / 0.016% |
1931 | 142 / #475 / 0.014% |
1930 | 141 / #503 / 0.013% |
1929 | 153 / #475 / 0.014% |
1928 | 149 / #496 / 0.013% |
1927 | 158 / #481 / 0.014% |
1926 | 162 / #472 / 0.015% |
1925 | 165 / #470 / 0.015% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1924 | 206 / #425 / 0.018% |
1923 | 185 / #451 / 0.017% |
1922 | 190 / #441 / 0.017% |
1921 | 165 / #479 / 0.015% |
1920 | 166 / #472 / 0.016% |
1919 | 165 / #460 / 0.017% |
1918 | 176 / #447 / 0.017% |
1917 | 163 / #444 / 0.018% |
1916 | 183 / #412 / 0.021% |
1915 | 157 / #432 / 0.019% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1914 | 168 / #366 / 0.026% |
1913 | 115 / #403 / 0.022% |
1912 | 83 / #429 / 0.019% |
1911 | 62 / #351 / 0.027% |
1910 | 71 / #294 / 0.037% |
1909 | 57 / #306 / 0.035% |
1908 | 52 / #304 / 0.034% |
1907 | 45 / #320 / 0.031% |
1906 | 57 / #261 / 0.043% |
1905 | 53 / #271 / 0.040% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1904 | 40 / #317 / 0.031% |
1903 | 46 / #274 / 0.039% |
1902 | 41 / #301 / 0.033% |
1901 | 37 / #287 / 0.035% |
1900 | 70 / #243 / 0.047% |
1899 | 35 / #296 / 0.033% |
1898 | 38 / #314 / 0.031% |
1897 | 44 / #264 / 0.039% |
1896 | 45 / #274 / 0.038% |
1895 | 53 / #248 / 0.045% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1894 | 32 / #313 / 0.028% |
1893 | 48 / #255 / 0.043% |
1892 | 42 / #282 / 0.034% |
1891 | 23 / #362 / 0.023% |
1890 | 42 / #269 / 0.038% |
1889 | 44 / #245 / 0.040% |
1888 | 45 / #268 / 0.037% |
1887 | 47 / #236 / 0.046% |
1886 | 50 / #241 / 0.045% |
1885 | 50 / #234 / 0.046% |
Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
---|---|
1884 | 39 / #275 / 0.034% |
1883 | 38 / #270 / 0.036% |
1882 | 44 / #259 / 0.039% |
1881 | 42 / #241 / 0.042% |
1880 | 43 / #256 / 0.039% |