Total babies named Lyman (all years): 8,553
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 / #13414 / 0.000% |
| 2022 | 8 / #9523 / 0.000% |
| 2021 | 11 / #7406 / 0.001% |
| 2020 | 9 / #8472 / 0.001% |
| 2019 | 8 / #9409 / 0.000% |
| 2018 | 7 / #10332 / 0.000% |
| 2017 | 15 / #5963 / 0.001% |
| 2016 | 16 / #5692 / 0.001% |
| 2015 | 12 / #6924 / 0.001% |
| 2014 | 13 / #6497 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2013 | 8 / #9337 / 0.000% |
| 2012 | 6 / #11707 / 0.000% |
| 2011 | 6 / #11725 / 0.000% |
| 2010 | 17 / #5390 / 0.001% |
| 2009 | 5 / #13715 / 0.000% |
| 2008 | 7 / #10598 / 0.000% |
| 2007 | 7 / #10462 / 0.000% |
| 2005 | 6 / #10956 / 0.000% |
| 2004 | 6 / #10825 / 0.000% |
| 2003 | 9 / #7604 / 0.000% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2002 | 11 / #6360 / 0.001% |
| 2001 | 6 / #10053 / 0.000% |
| 2000 | 6 / #9845 / 0.000% |
| 1999 | 6 / #9447 / 0.000% |
| 1998 | 9 / #6631 / 0.000% |
| 1997 | 13 / #4844 / 0.001% |
| 1996 | 16 / #4119 / 0.001% |
| 1995 | 10 / #5755 / 0.001% |
| 1994 | 15 / #4213 / 0.001% |
| 1993 | 12 / #4897 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1992 | 22 / #3074 / 0.001% |
| 1991 | 25 / #2725 / 0.001% |
| 1990 | 18 / #3406 / 0.001% |
| 1989 | 19 / #3167 / 0.001% |
| 1988 | 20 / #2818 / 0.001% |
| 1987 | 18 / #2905 / 0.001% |
| 1986 | 23 / #2399 / 0.001% |
| 1985 | 26 / #2156 / 0.001% |
| 1984 | 26 / #2077 / 0.001% |
| 1983 | 26 / #2059 / 0.001% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1982 | 28 / #1970 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 14 / #3143 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 27 / #2033 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 26 / #2025 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 21 / #2249 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 25 / #1979 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 28 / #1807 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 26 / #1866 / 0.002% |
| 1974 | 31 / #1606 / 0.002% |
| 1973 | 27 / #1724 / 0.002% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1972 | 34 / #1466 / 0.002% |
| 1971 | 41 / #1320 / 0.002% |
| 1970 | 49 / #1189 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 35 / #1369 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 46 / #1112 / 0.003% |
| 1967 | 37 / #1244 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 44 / #1122 / 0.002% |
| 1965 | 42 / #1179 / 0.002% |
| 1964 | 46 / #1138 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 58 / #997 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1962 | 64 / #950 / 0.003% |
| 1961 | 53 / #1073 / 0.003% |
| 1960 | 62 / #973 / 0.003% |
| 1959 | 70 / #917 / 0.003% |
| 1958 | 66 / #941 / 0.003% |
| 1957 | 84 / #829 / 0.004% |
| 1956 | 74 / #870 / 0.004% |
| 1955 | 85 / #797 / 0.004% |
| 1954 | 86 / #771 / 0.004% |
| 1953 | 68 / #870 / 0.003% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1952 | 84 / #767 / 0.004% |
| 1951 | 92 / #724 / 0.005% |
| 1950 | 91 / #720 / 0.005% |
| 1949 | 87 / #741 / 0.005% |
| 1948 | 104 / #664 / 0.006% |
| 1947 | 120 / #628 / 0.007% |
| 1946 | 90 / #684 / 0.006% |
| 1945 | 100 / #607 / 0.007% |
| 1944 | 110 / #588 / 0.008% |
| 1943 | 129 / #558 / 0.009% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1942 | 118 / #568 / 0.009% |
| 1941 | 124 / #530 / 0.010% |
| 1940 | 117 / #544 / 0.010% |
| 1939 | 119 / #526 / 0.011% |
| 1938 | 127 / #515 / 0.011% |
| 1937 | 106 / #564 / 0.010% |
| 1936 | 114 / #539 / 0.011% |
| 1935 | 127 / #510 / 0.012% |
| 1934 | 120 / #538 / 0.012% |
| 1933 | 115 / #530 / 0.012% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1932 | 135 / #495 / 0.013% |
| 1931 | 121 / #528 / 0.012% |
| 1930 | 149 / #485 / 0.014% |
| 1929 | 152 / #477 / 0.014% |
| 1928 | 176 / #456 / 0.016% |
| 1927 | 151 / #495 / 0.013% |
| 1926 | 185 / #446 / 0.017% |
| 1925 | 186 / #440 / 0.017% |
| 1924 | 195 / #438 / 0.017% |
| 1923 | 191 / #441 / 0.017% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1922 | 205 / #419 / 0.019% |
| 1921 | 201 / #430 / 0.018% |
| 1920 | 181 / #448 / 0.017% |
| 1919 | 164 / #462 / 0.017% |
| 1918 | 156 / #473 / 0.015% |
| 1917 | 220 / #381 / 0.024% |
| 1916 | 190 / #402 / 0.021% |
| 1915 | 180 / #400 / 0.021% |
| 1914 | 171 / #360 / 0.026% |
| 1913 | 91 / #453 / 0.018% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1912 | 88 / #416 / 0.020% |
| 1911 | 45 / #436 / 0.020% |
| 1910 | 31 / #507 / 0.016% |
| 1909 | 39 / #394 / 0.024% |
| 1908 | 28 / #470 / 0.018% |
| 1907 | 32 / #401 / 0.022% |
| 1906 | 29 / #404 / 0.022% |
| 1905 | 28 / #406 / 0.021% |
| 1904 | 29 / #384 / 0.023% |
| 1903 | 33 / #336 / 0.028% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1902 | 26 / #400 / 0.021% |
| 1901 | 26 / #367 / 0.024% |
| 1900 | 39 / #352 / 0.026% |
| 1899 | 33 / #308 / 0.031% |
| 1898 | 32 / #343 / 0.026% |
| 1897 | 35 / #314 / 0.031% |
| 1896 | 23 / #413 / 0.019% |
| 1895 | 21 / #433 / 0.018% |
| 1894 | 26 / #362 / 0.022% |
| 1893 | 29 / #329 / 0.026% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1892 | 28 / #366 / 0.023% |
| 1891 | 30 / #307 / 0.030% |
| 1890 | 27 / #338 / 0.024% |
| 1889 | 21 / #399 / 0.019% |
| 1888 | 34 / #311 / 0.028% |
| 1887 | 23 / #347 / 0.023% |
| 1886 | 34 / #297 / 0.031% |
| 1885 | 29 / #315 / 0.027% |
| 1884 | 37 / #287 / 0.032% |
| 1883 | 26 / #329 / 0.025% |
| Year | Boys (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1882 | 41 / #271 / 0.036% |
| 1881 | 21 / #372 / 0.021% |
| 1880 | 31 / #302 / 0.028% |