Total babies named Mabel (all years): 141,163
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 1,380 / #222 / 0.086% |
| 2023 | 1,130 / #278 / 0.071% |
| 2022 | 1,026 / #310 / 0.063% |
| 2021 | 831 / #375 / 0.051% |
| 2020 | 717 / #428 / 0.044% |
| 2019 | 712 / #440 / 0.042% |
| 2018 | 727 / #438 / 0.043% |
| 2017 | 703 / #452 / 0.041% |
| 2016 | 605 / #515 / 0.034% |
| 2015 | 529 / #578 / 0.030% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 427 / #669 / 0.024% |
| 2013 | 393 / #711 / 0.022% |
| 2012 | 241 / #1046 / 0.014% |
| 2011 | 196 / #1227 / 0.011% |
| 2010 | 177 / #1332 / 0.010% |
| 2009 | 147 / #1542 / 0.008% |
| 2008 | 139 / #1632 / 0.007% |
| 2007 | 127 / #1718 / 0.007% |
| 2006 | 116 / #1791 / 0.006% |
| 2005 | 106 / #1846 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 90 / #2034 / 0.005% |
| 2003 | 97 / #1891 / 0.005% |
| 2002 | 93 / #1907 / 0.005% |
| 2001 | 83 / #2044 / 0.005% |
| 2000 | 75 / #2152 / 0.004% |
| 1999 | 90 / #1779 / 0.005% |
| 1998 | 77 / #1969 / 0.004% |
| 1997 | 42 / #2911 / 0.002% |
| 1996 | 58 / #2299 / 0.003% |
| 1995 | 53 / #2442 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 76 / #1881 / 0.004% |
| 1993 | 65 / #2105 / 0.004% |
| 1992 | 80 / #1812 / 0.004% |
| 1991 | 75 / #1888 / 0.004% |
| 1990 | 78 / #1839 / 0.004% |
| 1989 | 64 / #1990 / 0.003% |
| 1988 | 105 / #1364 / 0.006% |
| 1987 | 86 / #1506 / 0.005% |
| 1986 | 72 / #1648 / 0.004% |
| 1985 | 67 / #1722 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 75 / #1523 / 0.004% |
| 1983 | 73 / #1547 / 0.004% |
| 1982 | 75 / #1577 / 0.004% |
| 1981 | 86 / #1428 / 0.005% |
| 1980 | 76 / #1549 / 0.005% |
| 1979 | 70 / #1616 / 0.004% |
| 1978 | 62 / #1698 / 0.004% |
| 1977 | 64 / #1647 / 0.004% |
| 1976 | 76 / #1402 / 0.005% |
| 1975 | 68 / #1506 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 82 / #1308 / 0.006% |
| 1973 | 65 / #1471 / 0.004% |
| 1972 | 68 / #1438 / 0.004% |
| 1971 | 75 / #1413 / 0.005% |
| 1970 | 60 / #1590 / 0.003% |
| 1969 | 86 / #1203 / 0.005% |
| 1968 | 71 / #1320 / 0.004% |
| 1967 | 72 / #1277 / 0.004% |
| 1966 | 84 / #1168 / 0.005% |
| 1965 | 94 / #1083 / 0.005% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 124 / #947 / 0.007% |
| 1963 | 122 / #960 / 0.006% |
| 1962 | 126 / #948 / 0.006% |
| 1961 | 140 / #914 / 0.007% |
| 1960 | 134 / #916 / 0.007% |
| 1959 | 140 / #877 / 0.007% |
| 1958 | 132 / #890 / 0.007% |
| 1957 | 175 / #755 / 0.009% |
| 1956 | 181 / #716 / 0.009% |
| 1955 | 194 / #672 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 173 / #707 / 0.009% |
| 1953 | 197 / #636 / 0.010% |
| 1952 | 216 / #593 / 0.012% |
| 1951 | 200 / #608 / 0.011% |
| 1950 | 228 / #549 / 0.013% |
| 1949 | 253 / #514 / 0.015% |
| 1948 | 311 / #453 / 0.018% |
| 1947 | 345 / #443 / 0.019% |
| 1946 | 334 / #421 / 0.021% |
| 1945 | 344 / #379 / 0.026% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 387 / #351 / 0.029% |
| 1943 | 478 / #319 / 0.034% |
| 1942 | 513 / #304 / 0.038% |
| 1941 | 507 / #285 / 0.042% |
| 1940 | 548 / #265 / 0.048% |
| 1939 | 593 / #256 / 0.054% |
| 1938 | 674 / #245 / 0.061% |
| 1937 | 697 / #233 / 0.066% |
| 1936 | 743 / #222 / 0.071% |
| 1935 | 826 / #208 / 0.079% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 850 / #209 / 0.081% |
| 1933 | 875 / #196 / 0.087% |
| 1932 | 1,111 / #171 / 0.104% |
| 1931 | 1,060 / #174 / 0.100% |
| 1930 | 1,369 / #150 / 0.122% |
| 1929 | 1,516 / #147 / 0.136% |
| 1928 | 1,742 / #135 / 0.151% |
| 1927 | 1,954 / #133 / 0.164% |
| 1926 | 2,076 / #127 / 0.175% |
| 1925 | 2,292 / #118 / 0.188% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 2,652 / #108 / 0.212% |
| 1923 | 2,696 / #102 / 0.223% |
| 1922 | 2,894 / #99 / 0.241% |
| 1921 | 3,336 / #85 / 0.271% |
| 1920 | 3,364 / #83 / 0.281% |
| 1919 | 3,405 / #78 / 0.301% |
| 1918 | 3,636 / #74 / 0.314% |
| 1917 | 3,499 / #68 / 0.324% |
| 1916 | 3,680 / #65 / 0.352% |
| 1915 | 3,683 / #62 / 0.374% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 3,131 / #58 / 0.411% |
| 1913 | 2,741 / #56 / 0.439% |
| 1912 | 2,714 / #46 / 0.486% |
| 1911 | 2,171 / #43 / 0.519% |
| 1910 | 2,123 / #46 / 0.535% |
| 1909 | 2,007 / #41 / 0.578% |
| 1908 | 2,096 / #37 / 0.627% |
| 1907 | 2,069 / #36 / 0.649% |
| 1906 | 2,054 / #34 / 0.696% |
| 1905 | 2,178 / #29 / 0.747% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 2,172 / #27 / 0.789% |
| 1903 | 2,163 / #25 / 0.826% |
| 1902 | 2,280 / #24 / 0.863% |
| 1901 | 2,097 / #24 / 0.876% |
| 1900 | 2,509 / #25 / 0.837% |
| 1899 | 2,127 / #22 / 0.913% |
| 1898 | 2,331 / #23 / 0.901% |
| 1897 | 2,222 / #22 / 0.949% |
| 1896 | 2,283 / #21 / 0.960% |
| 1895 | 2,359 / #20 / 1.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 2,221 / #20 / 0.996% |
| 1893 | 2,191 / #21 / 1.029% |
| 1892 | 2,170 / #19 / 1.022% |
| 1891 | 2,029 / #15 / 1.094% |
| 1890 | 2,058 / #17 / 1.081% |
| 1889 | 1,947 / #16 / 1.092% |
| 1888 | 1,830 / #17 / 1.025% |
| 1887 | 1,494 / #18 / 1.023% |
| 1886 | 1,422 / #20 / 0.984% |
| 1885 | 1,349 / #20 / 1.014% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 1,270 / #20 / 0.984% |
| 1883 | 1,086 / #23 / 0.967% |
| 1882 | 997 / #23 / 0.924% |
| 1881 | 893 / #23 / 0.971% |
| 1880 | 808 / #22 / 0.888% |