Total babies named Madge (all years): 13,430
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 5 / #17836 / 0.000% |
| 1982 | 5 / #11524 / 0.000% |
| 1981 | 8 / #7836 / 0.000% |
| 1979 | 8 / #7721 / 0.001% |
| 1978 | 6 / #9236 / 0.000% |
| 1977 | 5 / #10572 / 0.000% |
| 1975 | 11 / #5357 / 0.001% |
| 1974 | 10 / #5599 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 10 / #5307 / 0.001% |
| 1971 | 10 / #5341 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1970 | 7 / #6752 / 0.000% |
| 1969 | 17 / #3403 / 0.001% |
| 1968 | 13 / #3912 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 15 / #3424 / 0.001% |
| 1966 | 16 / #3220 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 12 / #3857 / 0.001% |
| 1964 | 22 / #2720 / 0.001% |
| 1963 | 25 / #2461 / 0.001% |
| 1962 | 27 / #2343 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 33 / #2056 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1960 | 37 / #1874 / 0.002% |
| 1959 | 28 / #2177 / 0.001% |
| 1958 | 38 / #1780 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 44 / #1635 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 60 / #1346 / 0.003% |
| 1955 | 45 / #1529 / 0.002% |
| 1954 | 54 / #1373 / 0.003% |
| 1953 | 42 / #1521 / 0.002% |
| 1952 | 63 / #1207 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 57 / #1233 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1950 | 53 / #1264 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 62 / #1160 / 0.004% |
| 1948 | 87 / #934 / 0.005% |
| 1947 | 75 / #1030 / 0.004% |
| 1946 | 73 / #983 / 0.005% |
| 1945 | 66 / #949 / 0.005% |
| 1944 | 104 / #748 / 0.008% |
| 1943 | 90 / #822 / 0.006% |
| 1942 | 96 / #777 / 0.007% |
| 1941 | 96 / #723 / 0.008% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1940 | 127 / #624 / 0.011% |
| 1939 | 107 / #657 / 0.010% |
| 1938 | 115 / #641 / 0.010% |
| 1937 | 132 / #587 / 0.012% |
| 1936 | 125 / #592 / 0.012% |
| 1935 | 132 / #557 / 0.013% |
| 1934 | 175 / #486 / 0.017% |
| 1933 | 174 / #484 / 0.017% |
| 1932 | 191 / #478 / 0.018% |
| 1931 | 193 / #467 / 0.018% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1930 | 209 / #466 / 0.019% |
| 1929 | 203 / #469 / 0.018% |
| 1928 | 292 / #391 / 0.025% |
| 1927 | 273 / #417 / 0.023% |
| 1926 | 325 / #378 / 0.027% |
| 1925 | 314 / #387 / 0.026% |
| 1924 | 379 / #352 / 0.030% |
| 1923 | 373 / #338 / 0.031% |
| 1922 | 397 / #329 / 0.033% |
| 1921 | 428 / #317 / 0.035% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1920 | 464 / #303 / 0.039% |
| 1919 | 428 / #306 / 0.038% |
| 1918 | 463 / #298 / 0.040% |
| 1917 | 435 / #298 / 0.040% |
| 1916 | 418 / #294 / 0.040% |
| 1915 | 378 / #301 / 0.038% |
| 1914 | 288 / #308 / 0.038% |
| 1913 | 264 / #292 / 0.042% |
| 1912 | 234 / #296 / 0.042% |
| 1911 | 210 / #269 / 0.050% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1910 | 217 / #261 / 0.055% |
| 1909 | 180 / #267 / 0.052% |
| 1908 | 200 / #241 / 0.060% |
| 1907 | 166 / #269 / 0.052% |
| 1906 | 169 / #251 / 0.057% |
| 1905 | 184 / #233 / 0.063% |
| 1904 | 170 / #238 / 0.062% |
| 1903 | 146 / #251 / 0.056% |
| 1902 | 154 / #250 / 0.058% |
| 1901 | 143 / #241 / 0.060% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1900 | 184 / #232 / 0.061% |
| 1899 | 122 / #258 / 0.052% |
| 1898 | 178 / #217 / 0.069% |
| 1897 | 125 / #254 / 0.053% |
| 1896 | 109 / #273 / 0.046% |
| 1895 | 126 / #251 / 0.054% |
| 1894 | 115 / #256 / 0.052% |
| 1893 | 105 / #262 / 0.049% |
| 1892 | 104 / #260 / 0.049% |
| 1891 | 78 / #284 / 0.042% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1890 | 100 / #249 / 0.053% |
| 1889 | 80 / #264 / 0.045% |
| 1888 | 77 / #265 / 0.043% |
| 1887 | 65 / #262 / 0.045% |
| 1886 | 66 / #257 / 0.046% |
| 1885 | 55 / #269 / 0.041% |
| 1884 | 59 / #256 / 0.046% |
| 1883 | 49 / #259 / 0.044% |
| 1882 | 41 / #274 / 0.038% |
| 1881 | 41 / #248 / 0.045% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1880 | 41 / #244 / 0.045% |