Total babies named Magdalene (all years): 9,828
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 157 / #1419 / 0.010% |
| 2023 | 140 / #1530 / 0.009% |
| 2022 | 121 / #1727 / 0.007% |
| 2021 | 90 / #2109 / 0.005% |
| 2020 | 112 / #1779 / 0.007% |
| 2019 | 89 / #2120 / 0.005% |
| 2018 | 122 / #1701 / 0.007% |
| 2017 | 109 / #1872 / 0.006% |
| 2016 | 140 / #1586 / 0.008% |
| 2015 | 116 / #1808 / 0.007% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2014 | 134 / #1611 / 0.008% |
| 2013 | 126 / #1680 / 0.007% |
| 2012 | 99 / #1979 / 0.006% |
| 2011 | 107 / #1881 / 0.006% |
| 2010 | 110 / #1855 / 0.006% |
| 2009 | 106 / #1969 / 0.006% |
| 2008 | 102 / #2039 / 0.005% |
| 2007 | 96 / #2110 / 0.005% |
| 2006 | 113 / #1820 / 0.006% |
| 2005 | 115 / #1726 / 0.006% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 2004 | 89 / #2058 / 0.005% |
| 2003 | 92 / #1979 / 0.005% |
| 2002 | 67 / #2400 / 0.004% |
| 2001 | 82 / #2057 / 0.005% |
| 2000 | 89 / #1915 / 0.005% |
| 1999 | 78 / #2011 / 0.004% |
| 1998 | 54 / #2554 / 0.003% |
| 1997 | 64 / #2165 / 0.004% |
| 1996 | 77 / #1891 / 0.004% |
| 1995 | 45 / #2710 / 0.003% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1994 | 58 / #2282 / 0.003% |
| 1993 | 51 / #2476 / 0.003% |
| 1992 | 30 / #3637 / 0.002% |
| 1991 | 34 / #3260 / 0.002% |
| 1990 | 39 / #2933 / 0.002% |
| 1989 | 38 / #2904 / 0.002% |
| 1988 | 35 / #2956 / 0.002% |
| 1987 | 32 / #3003 / 0.002% |
| 1986 | 47 / #2216 / 0.003% |
| 1985 | 39 / #2521 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1984 | 33 / #2759 / 0.002% |
| 1983 | 33 / #2704 / 0.002% |
| 1982 | 33 / #2805 / 0.002% |
| 1981 | 23 / #3583 / 0.001% |
| 1980 | 26 / #3276 / 0.002% |
| 1979 | 30 / #2896 / 0.002% |
| 1978 | 20 / #3711 / 0.001% |
| 1977 | 25 / #3130 / 0.002% |
| 1976 | 25 / #2974 / 0.002% |
| 1975 | 28 / #2716 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1974 | 15 / #4146 / 0.001% |
| 1973 | 18 / #3575 / 0.001% |
| 1972 | 19 / #3355 / 0.001% |
| 1971 | 21 / #3221 / 0.001% |
| 1970 | 19 / #3378 / 0.001% |
| 1969 | 30 / #2379 / 0.002% |
| 1968 | 23 / #2675 / 0.001% |
| 1967 | 26 / #2406 / 0.002% |
| 1966 | 21 / #2720 / 0.001% |
| 1965 | 25 / #2443 / 0.001% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 30 / #2231 / 0.002% |
| 1963 | 31 / #2154 / 0.002% |
| 1962 | 28 / #2290 / 0.001% |
| 1961 | 30 / #2186 / 0.001% |
| 1960 | 29 / #2174 / 0.001% |
| 1959 | 34 / #1939 / 0.002% |
| 1958 | 41 / #1693 / 0.002% |
| 1957 | 33 / #1915 / 0.002% |
| 1956 | 44 / #1609 / 0.002% |
| 1955 | 44 / #1549 / 0.002% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1954 | 43 / #1551 / 0.002% |
| 1953 | 57 / #1293 / 0.003% |
| 1952 | 50 / #1378 / 0.003% |
| 1951 | 53 / #1284 / 0.003% |
| 1950 | 58 / #1220 / 0.003% |
| 1949 | 48 / #1331 / 0.003% |
| 1948 | 53 / #1263 / 0.003% |
| 1947 | 51 / #1277 / 0.003% |
| 1946 | 53 / #1186 / 0.003% |
| 1945 | 47 / #1152 / 0.004% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1944 | 77 / #870 / 0.006% |
| 1943 | 68 / #960 / 0.005% |
| 1942 | 75 / #911 / 0.006% |
| 1941 | 70 / #873 / 0.006% |
| 1940 | 77 / #814 / 0.007% |
| 1939 | 62 / #894 / 0.006% |
| 1938 | 81 / #780 / 0.007% |
| 1937 | 69 / #829 / 0.006% |
| 1936 | 90 / #704 / 0.009% |
| 1935 | 103 / #644 / 0.010% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1934 | 107 / #648 / 0.010% |
| 1933 | 116 / #605 / 0.012% |
| 1932 | 113 / #631 / 0.011% |
| 1931 | 123 / #598 / 0.012% |
| 1930 | 146 / #565 / 0.013% |
| 1929 | 111 / #664 / 0.010% |
| 1928 | 154 / #570 / 0.013% |
| 1927 | 127 / #635 / 0.011% |
| 1926 | 137 / #608 / 0.012% |
| 1925 | 141 / #617 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1924 | 172 / #557 / 0.014% |
| 1923 | 199 / #493 / 0.017% |
| 1922 | 161 / #566 / 0.013% |
| 1921 | 174 / #540 / 0.014% |
| 1920 | 182 / #521 / 0.015% |
| 1919 | 178 / #508 / 0.016% |
| 1918 | 185 / #500 / 0.016% |
| 1917 | 183 / #485 / 0.017% |
| 1916 | 156 / #529 / 0.015% |
| 1915 | 151 / #505 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1914 | 130 / #488 / 0.017% |
| 1913 | 74 / #602 / 0.012% |
| 1912 | 87 / #519 / 0.016% |
| 1911 | 71 / #492 / 0.017% |
| 1910 | 54 / #561 / 0.014% |
| 1909 | 63 / #474 / 0.018% |
| 1908 | 37 / #635 / 0.011% |
| 1907 | 47 / #527 / 0.015% |
| 1906 | 35 / #606 / 0.012% |
| 1905 | 35 / #595 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1904 | 56 / #432 / 0.020% |
| 1903 | 33 / #568 / 0.013% |
| 1902 | 36 / #541 / 0.014% |
| 1901 | 28 / #596 / 0.012% |
| 1900 | 32 / #628 / 0.011% |
| 1899 | 26 / #614 / 0.011% |
| 1898 | 22 / #709 / 0.009% |
| 1897 | 27 / #590 / 0.012% |
| 1896 | 29 / #574 / 0.012% |
| 1895 | 29 / #558 / 0.012% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1894 | 29 / #541 / 0.013% |
| 1893 | 34 / #459 / 0.016% |
| 1892 | 36 / #457 / 0.017% |
| 1891 | 33 / #444 / 0.018% |
| 1890 | 17 / #659 / 0.009% |
| 1889 | 16 / #652 / 0.009% |
| 1888 | 19 / #588 / 0.011% |
| 1887 | 16 / #576 / 0.011% |
| 1886 | 17 / #550 / 0.012% |
| 1885 | 20 / #480 / 0.015% |
| Year | Girls (count / rank / %) |
|---|---|
| 1884 | 9 / #772 / 0.007% |
| 1883 | 10 / #638 / 0.009% |
| 1882 | 12 / #552 / 0.011% |
| 1881 | 14 / #462 / 0.015% |
| 1880 | 13 / #484 / 0.014% |